Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 12:21:58PM -0500, Edward Rudd wrote: > From reading the bug report, it seems that there was one objection to the > patch, in that it adds a new keyword, and the preference was to extend the > existing AllowOverride keyword. So the next step should be to update the > patch to

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Refer to http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html --- especially; To apply the ALv2 to a new software distribution, include one copy of the license text by copying the file: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LIC

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 05:13:45PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote: > > From: Andre Schild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > As there are no other problem reportts, it's time to tag RC3 ? > > Correct. Can you pull in the latest apr_file_info.h from the 0.9 branch when you retag to pick up the setuid/set

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

Referring to our own license's redistribution requirements; 4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You meet the following conditions: * You

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Heh, maybe they don't. In the win32 installer and build system we drop them into the target directory, alongside the bin, htdocs, modules directories. On unix, we do toss LICENSE into $target/manual/ - but we are missing NOTICE in the build system. Perhaps that's the

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

At 01:18 PM 6/24/2004, Graham Leggett wrote: >William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >>Graham, silly question. When it deploys as an RPM, do we also copy >>LICENSE and NOTICE to some appropriate spot? This tripped me in >>the latest updates - was moving the LICENSE and not NOTICE in the >>time since that

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Graham, silly question. When it deploys as an RPM, do we also copy LICENSE and NOTICE to some appropriate spot? This tripped me in the latest updates - was moving the LICENSE and not NOTICE in the time since that second file was introduced. Just checked: Neither our RP

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

At 12:33 PM 6/24/2004, Graham Leggett wrote: >Sander Striker wrote: > >>My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball... >>I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC2) and uploaded associated >>tarballs to: >> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ >>Please test and report. > >The tarball refuses to

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

Jeff Trawick wrote: --- build/rpm/httpd.spec.in2004-02-07 20:44:30.0 +0200 +++ httpd.spec.in2004-06-24 19:25:19.0 +0200 @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ License: Apache License, Version 2.0 Group: System Environment/Daemons BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-root -BuildPrereq: openldap-deve

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

Graham Leggett wrote: --- build/rpm/httpd.spec.in 2004-02-07 20:44:30.0 +0200 +++ httpd.spec.in 2004-06-24 19:25:19.0 +0200 @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ License: Apache License, Version 2.0 Group: System Environment/Daemons BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-root -BuildPrereq: openlda

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

Sander Striker wrote: My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball... I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC2) and uploaded associated tarballs to: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please test and report. The tarball refuses to build as an RPM. The attached patch fixes this. I need one mo

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

> From: Andre Schild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 4:53 PM [...] > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 23.06.2004 21:13:10 >>> > I just commited a fix for this. > > Bill [...] > I didi take it, and now it compiles fine under win 2000. > The server runs well under win2000 and nt 4.

Antw: Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

I didi take it, and now it compiles fine under win 2000. The server runs well under win2000 and nt 4.0 server. As there are no other problem reportts, it's time to tag RC3 ? André aarboard ag internet - networks - screen&print design - multimedia Egliweg 10 - Postfach 214 - CH-2560 Nidau (Swit

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:29:21 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > My only confusion is what your patch for AllowOverrideOptions does, that > AllowOverride doesn't accomplish. I've too few cycles to dig deeply, but > could you provide a trivial example? > >From reading the bug report, Tom's patch

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

I just commited a fix for this. Bill Andre Schild wrote: Hello, I have taken the sources as tagged in CSV and tried it to build under Windows 2000. It fails when compiling xlate.c to generate libaprutil xlate.c c:\Develop\Apache\httpd-2.0.50-rc1\srclib\apr-util\xlate\xlate.c(181) : error C2 198: 'a

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

At 12:12 PM 6/23/2004, Tom Alsberg wrote: >On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 11:30:22AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: >> the process for adding new features to Apache 2.0 is to first integrate the >> feature into Apache 2.1 (cvs HEAD). after that, the feature is voted upon >> for inclusion in the stable 2.0

Antw: RE: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

Hello Eddie, >>198: 'apr_iconv_open' : Nicht genuegend Parameter uebergeben >> c:\Develop\Apache\httpd-2.0.50-rc1\srclib\apr-util\xlate\xlate.c(182) : >> warning >> C4047: '=' : Anzahl der Dereferenzierungen bei 'void *' und 'int ' >> unterschiedli >> ch >> >Are you sure you have the rc2 tag? it

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:12:02 +0300, Tom Alsberg wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 11:30:22AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > So to ask differently: Any work in progress to get this into the > 2.1-HEAD branch? I just don't want that patch to sit there dead. > Given that nobody has said so much

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 11:30:22AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: > the process for adding new features to Apache 2.0 is to first integrate the > feature into Apache 2.1 (cvs HEAD). after that, the feature is voted upon > for inclusion in the stable 2.0 branch. Yes, I understand that... So to ask

RE: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:42:14 +0200, Andre Schild wrote: > Hello, > > It fails when compiling xlate.c to generate libaprutil > > xlate.c > c:\Develop\Apache\httpd-2.0.50-rc1\srclib\apr-util\xlate\xlate.c(181) : > error C2 > 198: 'apr_iconv_close' : Nicht genuegend Parameter uebergeben > c:\Develo

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

Tom Alsberg wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:09:39PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball... > > > OK, I'll be more direct now (my last mail to this list has apparently > been ignored). Can you please try to get this: > > http://issu

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:09:39PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote: > Hi, > > My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball... OK, I'll be more direct now (my last mail to this list has apparently been ignored). Can you please try to get this: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

Sander Striker wrote: > Hi, > > My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball... > > I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC2) and uploaded associated > tarballs to: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > Please test and report. plays nice with mod_perl-2.0 on fedora core 1. also

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

Sander Striker wrote: Hi, My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball... I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC2) and uploaded associated tarballs to: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please test and report. looks good to me on AIX 5.1 and Solaris 9...

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:09:39PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote: > Hi, > > My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball... > > I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC2) and uploaded associated > tarballs to: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > Please test and report. Asside from a

RE: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

Hello, I have taken the sources as tagged in CSV and tried it to build under Windows 2000. It fails when compiling xlate.c to generate libaprutil xlate.c c:\Develop\Apache\httpd-2.0.50-rc1\srclib\apr-util\xlate\xlate.c(181) : error C2 198: 'apr_iconv_close' : Nicht genuegend Parameter uebergeben

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

2004 10:09 PM Subject: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing > Hi, > > My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball... > > I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC2) and uploaded associated > tarballs to: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > Please test and report. > > > Thanks! > > Sander

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

+1 on NetWare

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

Builds and works well on; - Red Hat Linux 7.2, 7.3, 8.0, & 9.0 - Fedora Core Linux 1, & 2 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1, & 3.0 - Slackware Linux 8.1, 9.0, 9.1, & '-current' (AKA: 10.0 RC2) Thanks... -- Chip Cuccio| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NORLUG SysAdmin & Webm

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

* Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > Please test and report. Testsuite on Gentoo looks good. nd -- >I have tried using ErrorDocument 401, but doesn't work. ^ Oh dear. What does it do - loun

Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50-rc2 tarballs available for testing

Hi, My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball... I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC2) and uploaded associated tarballs to: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please test and report. Thanks! Sander