Re: Client authentication and authorization using client certificates

2010-03-16 Thread lambam80
e terms, and >> you're free to change the terms of any subsequent release (or prior >> release to other parties!) >> >> > > > Released version 0.2 of mod_auth_certificate under Apache License 2.0 > Download at https://sourceforge.net/projects/

Re: Client authentication and authorization using client certificates

2009-06-24 Thread Johannes Müller
Eric Covener wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Johannes Müller wrote: Yes should be no problem. Relicensing means I'll also have to remove current the current version and SVN revisions so there is no problem if someone already downloaded the GPLed release? IANAL: I don't see why,

Re: Client authentication and authorization using client certificates

2009-06-16 Thread Eric Covener
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Johannes Müller wrote: > Yes should be no problem. Relicensing means I'll also have to remove current > the current > version and SVN revisions so there is no problem if someone already > downloaded the > GPLed release? IANAL: I don't see why, they're free to use i

Re: Client authentication and authorization using client certificates

2009-06-16 Thread Johannes Müller
Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 06/16/2009 11:24 PM, Johannes Müller wrote: Eric Covener wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Johannes Müller wrote: Hello, Please note that this program is open source software and was released under the GPL. Regarding the license:

Re: Client authentication and authorization using client certificates

2009-06-16 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 06/16/2009 11:24 PM, Johannes Müller wrote: > Eric Covener wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Johannes Müller wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> Please note that this program is open source software and was >>> released under >>> the GPL. >>> >> >> Regarding the license: That's going to

Re: Client authentication and authorization using client certificates

2009-06-16 Thread Eric Covener
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Johannes Müller wrote: > Eric Covener wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Johannes Müller wrote: >> >>> >>> Hello, >>> Please note that this program is open source software and was released >>> under >>> the GPL. >>> >> >> Regarding  the license: That's g

Re: Client authentication and authorization using client certificates

2009-06-16 Thread Johannes Müller
Eric Covener wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Johannes Müller wrote: Hello, Please note that this program is open source software and was released under the GPL. Regarding the license: That's going to prevent some interested parties from clicking through, much less contributin

Re: Client authentication and authorization using client certificates

2009-06-16 Thread Eric Covener
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Johannes Müller wrote: > Hello, > Please note that this program is open source software and was released under > the GPL. Regarding the license: That's going to prevent some interested parties from clicking through, much less contributing to it. -- Eric Covener

Client authentication and authorization using client certificates

2009-06-16 Thread Johannes Müller
port for client certificate based authentication and authorization will in future offer improved chances to the Apache webserver. I can think of smartcards being an increasingly used SSO alternative to NTLM especially in heterogeneous environments. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at the m

Missing concept in Authentication and Authorization?

2004-06-28 Thread Douglas E. Engert
I have recently started to look how Authentication and Authorization in done in Apache, and have looked over Justin Erenkrantz's slides for "Authentication in Apache HTTP Server 2.1" and have been in touch with some of the mod_auth_kerb developers. My apologies if this is already

RE: Authentication and Authorization

2001-09-10 Thread Sander Striker
been going through the modules/aaa directory >> and found that modules there seem to implement both >> authentication and authorization. >> >> IMO this should be split. Auth and authz are >> completely different things and it would be nice >> to have

Re: Authentication and Authorization

2001-09-09 Thread sterling
he modules/aaa directory > and found that modules there seem to implement both > authentication and authorization. > > IMO this should be split. Auth and authz are > completely different things and it would be nice > to have different modules to do authentication > in a differ

Re: Authentication and Authorization

2001-09-09 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
.1 branch past its initial GA release, and authn/authz hackers can go a little crazy on the 2.1 branch? Bill - Original Message - From: "Graham Leggett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 8:06 AM Subject: Re: Authenticatio

Re: Authentication and Authorization

2001-09-09 Thread Graham Leggett
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote: > -1 (veto) for 2.0 development. I'd love to see this happen. > Not in the current cycle. I was actually contemplating an entire > split between the authn/authz storage and methods. But that can't > happen in this cycle either if we ever want to get to release. >

Re: Authentication and Authorization

2001-09-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 6:36 AM > I've been going through the modules/aaa directory > and found that modules there seem to implement both > authentication and authorization. > > IMO this should be spl

Re: Authentication and Authorization

2001-09-07 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Sander Striker wrote: > > I've been going through the modules/aaa directory > and found that modules there seem to implement both > authentication and authorization. Yar, that's a right bugger. I have had a replacement system in my head for a couple of years now

RE: Authentication and Authorization

2001-09-07 Thread Sander Striker
[replying to my own msg] >> Sander Striker wrote: >> >>> IMO this should be split. Auth and authz are >>> completely different things and it would be nice >>> to have different modules to do authentication >>> in a different way, but still utilize the same >>> authorization method. >> >> I'm n

RE: Authentication and Authorization

2001-09-07 Thread Sander Striker
> Sander Striker wrote: > > > IMO this should be split. Auth and authz are > > completely different things and it would be nice > > to have different modules to do authentication > > in a different way, but still utilize the same > > authorization method. > > I'm not sure if splitting them will

Re: Authentication and Authorization

2001-09-07 Thread Graham Leggett
Joshua Slive wrote: > Just as a point of information, a relatively frequent request that I hear > from users is to provide group information in an env variable (REMOTE_GROUPS > analagous to REMOTE_USER). This would certainly facilitate that. I am about to add something like this to mod_auth_lda

RE: Authentication and Authorization

2001-09-07 Thread Joshua Slive
> -Original Message- > From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > I've been going through the modules/aaa directory > and found that modules there seem to implement both > authentication and authorization. > > IMO this should be split. Auth and authz

Re: Authentication and Authorization

2001-09-07 Thread Graham Leggett
Sander Striker wrote: > IMO this should be split. Auth and authz are > completely different things and it would be nice > to have different modules to do authentication > in a different way, but still utilize the same > authorization method. I'm not sure if splitting them will accomplish this t

Authentication and Authorization

2001-09-07 Thread Sander Striker
Hi, I've been going through the modules/aaa directory and found that modules there seem to implement both authentication and authorization. IMO this should be split. Auth and authz are completely different things and it would be nice to have different modules to do authentication