On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:01 PM, wrote:
> - Original Message -
> Subject: Re: C99 bump prior to apr 2.0?
> From: "Gregg Smith"
> Date: 9/4/14 12:47 pm
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
>
> On 9/4/2014 8:49 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> >
- Original Message - Subject: Re: C99 bump prior to apr 2.0?
From: "Gregg Smith"
Date: 9/4/14 12:47 pm
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
On 9/4/2014 8:49 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> I overlooked 2 other viable options
>
> [ ] Roll -win32-src-r2.zip with
On 9/4/2014 8:49 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I overlooked 2 other viable options
[ ] Roll -win32-src-r2.zip with apr-util 1.5.2 (pre-breakage) and
corresponding binaries
[ ] Roll -win32-src-r2.zip with apr-util 1.5.4 (upon release) and
corresponding binaries
Assumes a much quicker path to
understand the train of thought here
to inform my decision making on how we build our apache based server.
Thanks,
Andy
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 08:35 -0700, wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
> - Original Message -
> Subject: Re: C99 bump prior to apr 2.0?
&
s hosed and will likely segfault, in
the best case.
----- Original Message -
Subject: Re: C99 bump prior to apr 2.0?
From: "Issac Goldstand"
Date: 9/4/14 10:00 am
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
You can't, AFAIK, due to licensing. You need to include the *installer*
that c
According to:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/8kche8ah.aspx
And
the redist.txt file in the Visual Studio Redist directory:
For your convenience, we have provided the following folders for use when
redistributing VC++ runtime files. Subject to the license terms for the
software, you may
I overlooked 2 other viable options
[ ] Roll -win32-src-r2.zip with apr-util 1.5.2 (pre-breakage) and
corresponding binaries
[ ] Roll -win32-src-r2.zip with apr-util 1.5.4 (upon release) and
corresponding binaries
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
>Finally returned to VC6, having replaced my older
- Original Message - Subject: Re: C99 bump prior to apr 2.0?
From: "Wang, Andy"
Date: 9/4/14 9:48 am
To: "dev@httpd.apache.org"
Is there a reason to not bundle the msvcrtxxx.dll that's microsoft includes in
the redist area?
So that's what we
t then
manipulates these msvcr objects is hosed and will likely segfault, in
the best case.
- Original Message ----- Subject: Re: C99 bump prior to apr 2.0?
From: "Issac Goldstand"
Date: 9/4/14 10:00 am
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
You can't, AFAIK, due to licensi
You can't, AFAIK, due to licensing. You need to include the *installer*
that comes in VC's redist area and can run that installer from yours to
install their runtime...
Or you can statically link to the runtime, but I'm not sure we want to
do that.
On 04/09/2014 17:48, Wang, Andy wrote:
> Is the
Is there a reason to not bundle the msvcrtxxx.dll that's microsoft includes in
the redist area?
So that's what we've taken to doing with our apache. Simply including the
version that microsoft bundles with 2010 in the web server bin directory.
Thanks,
Andy
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 17:52 -0500, Wi
And to answer the question, VC6 for httpd 2.2 is simply for msvcrt.DLL
compatibility and no-surprises upgrades. It is suboptimal, but not as
suboptimal as MS's active disdain for msvcr###.dll users.
"Wang, Andy" wrote:
>On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 09:27 -0700, wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
>> Finally
The 1.5 apr-util (and apr) branches are actively maintained. You have forward
binary compatibility since 1.0 used in the early 2.1-dev days. Because 1.4.x
was not receiving attention (and was missing new API's used for httpd-2.4) the
project determined it would bundle 1.5 rather than the now-s
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 09:27 -0700, wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
> Finally returned to VC6, having replaced my older svn on Windows
> which would no longer handshake with svn.apache.org and bumped into
> a single issue.
>
> Building VC6 binaries for win32, I was bitten by r1508904 which
> introduces
Hi Bill,
On 03.09.2014 18:27, wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
In terms of providing dist/httpd/binaries/win32 httpd 2.2.29 based on
msvcrt,dll, I have a couple of options;
[x] Ship with r1563992 applied (and document this? where?)
[ ] Drop apr_dbd_odbc.dll from the distribution
[ ] Don't ship
a
That pesky intptr_t,
On 9/3/2014 9:27 AM, wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote
In terms of providing dist/httpd/binaries/win32 httpd 2.2.29 based on
msvcrt,dll, I have a couple of options;
[+1] Ship with r1563992 applied (and document this? where?)
[ +/-0] Drop apr_dbd_odbc.dll from the distribution
[ -
Finally returned to VC6, having replaced my older svn on Windows
which would no longer handshake with svn.apache.org and bumped into
a single issue.
Building VC6 binaries for win32, I was bitten by r1508904 which introduces
a C99 type prior to releasing apr 2.0 (probably not a good idea to make
s
17 matches
Mail list logo
