Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I am personally +0 on the idea, but my only reservation is that
we have too many eggs in one basket already. One of these days,
some kind soul will have the energy to build a CPAN-like module
registry and distribution mechanism.
We talked about this in good detail back a
Paul Querna wrote:
>
> Successful CPAN-like systems were mostly started back when package
> management was an enormous pain. It still is on some platforms
> *cough*solaris*cough*, but they are generally the exception these days.
Also, in almost every case CPAN-style systems focus on one language
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I am personally +0 on the idea, but my only reservation is that
we have too many eggs in one basket already. One of these days,
some kind soul will have the energy to build a CPAN-like module
registry and distribution mechanism.
We talked about this in good detail back a