RE: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43

2003-06-04 Thread Rahul Kohli
:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43 Rahul Kohli wrote: I was able to resolve the shmmat error by exporting the environment variable EXTSHM. Please suggest me how can I make my library compatible to later versions as well. Right now I have made

Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43

2003-06-04 Thread Jeff Trawick
Rahul Kohli wrote: Regarding the function ap_custom_response() , for this we have added our own implementation that is specific to apache 2.0 on AIX. Don't call it that! You shouldn't use the ap_ or apr_ or apu_ prefixes at all for your symbols, much less implement a function/method with the

FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43

2003-06-03 Thread Rahul Kohli
Thanks Jeff. I am facing the same type of problem mentioned by you. Originally I was running my application on Apache 1.3.26 i was using httpd.exp. It was working fine. apachectl start started the server properly our library was loaded. Now we are switching to apache 2.0.43 and facing error

Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43

2003-06-03 Thread Bill Stoddard
Rahul Kohli wrote: Thanks Jeff. I am facing the same type of problem mentioned by you. Originally I was running my application on Apache 1.3.26 i was using httpd.exp. It was working fine. apachectl start started the server properly our library was loaded. Now we are switching to apache 2.0.43

Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43

2003-06-03 Thread Stas Bekman
Jeff Trawick wrote: Run-time linking on AIX isn't a set of libraries to link with; it is instead a particular mode of resolving symbols with shared libraries that doesn't use hard-coded paths such as those specified in httpd.exp, apr.exp, and aprutil.exp. Instead of telling the linker to look

Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43

2003-06-03 Thread Jeff Trawick
Stas Bekman wrote: When I've ported mod_perl 2.0 build to AIX, I have resorted to just using -berok (which is one of the flags enabled by -G). -G itself didn't quite work, I don't remember why. However I was told that it depends on which compiler is used, I've heard that this

Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43

2003-06-03 Thread Stas Bekman
Jeff Trawick wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: When I've ported mod_perl 2.0 build to AIX, I have resorted to just using -berok (which is one of the flags enabled by -G). -G itself didn't quite work, I don't remember why. However I was told that it depends on which compiler is used, I've heard that

Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43

2003-06-03 Thread Jeff Trawick
Stas Bekman wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: the only part I've heard about where run-time linking doesn't always work is when two pieces of code implement the same symbol, since there is a flat namespace... traditional AIX dynamic linking is two-level namespace, where for each

RE: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43

2003-06-03 Thread Rahul Kohli
PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 6:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43 Stas Bekman wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: the only part I've heard about where run-time linking doesn't always work is when two pieces of code implement

Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43

2003-06-03 Thread Stas Bekman
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 6:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43 Stas Bekman wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: the only part I've heard about where run-time linking doesn't always work is when two pieces of code

RE: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43

2003-06-03 Thread Rahul Kohli
#SPTA3C4F276668STUE Regards, Rahul -Original Message- From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 6:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43 Stas Bekman wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: the only part I've

RE: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43

2003-06-03 Thread Rahul Kohli
, 2003 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43 Rahul Kohli wrote: Stas, As per your suggestion I removed -bE , -G option and added -brtl instead but still the issue remains the same The new command is as mentioned below: /usr

RE: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43

2003-06-03 Thread Rahul Kohli
parameter or some patch need to be applied to resolve this issue. Thanks, Rahul Kohli -Original Message- From: Rahul Kohli Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43 Stas, I tried

Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43

2003-06-03 Thread Jeff Trawick
Rahul Kohli wrote: We are able to load the library by importing symbols from apr.exp and aprutil.exp and removing the -G option. There's an issue with that for you to be aware of... Build with Apache 2.0.45, and apr.exp and aprutil.exp specify that the names of apr and aprutil are libapr.so

RE: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43

2003-06-03 Thread Rahul Kohli
-bE:my_lib.exp But how can I make this work on 2.0.45 version and later. Kindly suggest. Rahul Kohli -Original Message- From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43 Rahul Kohli wrote

Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43

2003-06-03 Thread Jeff Trawick
Rahul Kohli wrote: I was able to resolve the shmmat error by exporting the environment variable EXTSHM. Please suggest me how can I make my library compatible to later versions as well. Right now I have made a change to remove -G and -brtl option and using apr.exp , aprutil.exp.exp. The link