Re: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled (take 2)

2002-02-04 Thread Jim Jagielski
Victor J. Orlikowski wrote: > > Ugh. Behind on mail. > > My fault; needed it for cadaver for testing... ;) > Why do I feel like I just entered an episode of 6 Feet Under? :) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled (take 2)

2002-02-04 Thread Victor J. Orlikowski
My apologies. The context was to provide a semi-humorous reply to the breakage I caused Jeff by installing Expat on the AIX box we use. Been a while since the mail, been a while since I posted last. Grrr. ;) Victor -- Victor J. Orlikowski | The Wall is Down, But the Threat Remains! ==

RE: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled (take 2)

2002-02-04 Thread Joshua Slive
> From: Victor J. Orlikowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Ugh. Behind on mail. > > My fault; needed it for cadaver for testing... ;) Victor: You need a little context on your mail. I don't know about others, but I have no idea what you are replying to. Joshua.

Re: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled (take 2)

2002-02-04 Thread Victor J. Orlikowski
Ugh. Behind on mail. My fault; needed it for cadaver for testing... ;) Victor -- Victor J. Orlikowski | The Wall is Down, But the Threat Remains! == [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled (take 2)

2002-02-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm still struggling with the tarball on AIX. I think it is just a > > matter of cleaning up libtool 1.3 droplets so that a fresh buildconf > > does what it is supposed to do. > > That and, for me, workin

Re: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled (take 2)

2002-02-02 Thread Bill Stoddard
Compiles and serves pages on Windows. Need to spend a bit more time to see if it is beta quality. Bill > the NW patch is in there. > the non-crap tarballs are in the /dist directory. > > > > who would have thought making a tar ball would be so hard. > ..Ian >

Re: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled (take 2)

2002-02-02 Thread Greg Ames
Ian Holsman wrote: > > the NW patch is in there. > the non-crap tarballs are in the /dist directory. > > who would have thought making a tar ball would be so hard. > ..Ian The version I got from ~jerenkrantz yesterday PM has been running live on daedalus since Saturday, 02-Feb-2002 07:58:29 PST

Re: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled (take 2)

2002-02-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm still struggling with the tarball on AIX. I think it is just a > matter of cleaning up libtool 1.3 droplets so that a fresh buildconf > does what it is supposed to do. That and, for me, working around the fact that "somebody" installed an expat RPM

Re: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled (take 2)

2002-02-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > the NW patch is in there. > the non-crap tarballs are in the /dist directory. +1 for FreeBSD 3.4... I unpacked it, did binbuild, did the binbuild installation, and hammered* it over local LAN with 200,000 requests (mix of CGI, / to drive lots of wrowe

Re: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled (take 2)

2002-02-01 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 04:46:58PM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote: > the NW patch is in there. > the non-crap tarballs are in the /dist directory. > > > > who would have thought making a tar ball would be so hard. No kidding. It'll be easier next time. After initially thinking there was a problem