Sander Striker wrote:
> IMO this should be split. Auth and authz are
> completely different things and it would be nice
> to have different modules to do authentication
> in a different way, but still utilize the same
> authorization method.
I'm not sure if splitting them will accomplish this t
> -Original Message-
> From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I've been going through the modules/aaa directory
> and found that modules there seem to implement both
> authentication and authorization.
>
> IMO this should be split. Auth and authz are
> completely different t
Joshua Slive wrote:
> Just as a point of information, a relatively frequent request that I hear
> from users is to provide group information in an env variable (REMOTE_GROUPS
> analagous to REMOTE_USER). This would certainly facilitate that.
I am about to add something like this to mod_auth_lda
> Sander Striker wrote:
>
> > IMO this should be split. Auth and authz are
> > completely different things and it would be nice
> > to have different modules to do authentication
> > in a different way, but still utilize the same
> > authorization method.
>
> I'm not sure if splitting them will
[replying to my own msg]
>> Sander Striker wrote:
>>
>>> IMO this should be split. Auth and authz are
>>> completely different things and it would be nice
>>> to have different modules to do authentication
>>> in a different way, but still utilize the same
>>> authorization method.
>>
>> I'm n
Sander Striker wrote:
>
> I've been going through the modules/aaa directory
> and found that modules there seem to implement both
> authentication and authorization.
Yar, that's a right bugger. I have had a replacement
system in my head for a couple of years now, but it
requires some substantia
From: "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 6:36 AM
> I've been going through the modules/aaa directory
> and found that modules there seem to implement both
> authentication and authorization.
>
> IMO this should be split. Auth and authz are
> completely differ
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> -1 (veto) for 2.0 development. I'd love to see this happen.
> Not in the current cycle. I was actually contemplating an entire
> split between the authn/authz storage and methods. But that can't
> happen in this cycle either if we ever want to get to release.
>
.1 branch
past its initial GA release, and authn/authz hackers can go a little crazy on the
2.1 branch?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Leggett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 8:06 AM
Subject: Re: Authenticatio
Hi -
IMHO, there is no apache dependency that requires auth and authz to be in
the same module usually, it is just logical that the application
handle both phases - but that is on the module writer.
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Sander Striker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been going through the modules/aaa
> From: sterling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Hi -
>
> IMHO, there is no apache dependency that requires auth and authz to be in
> the same module usually, it is just logical that the application
> handle both phases - but that is on the module writer.
Yes, but the choice of doing group looku
11 matches
Mail list logo
