Re: modules.apache.org is down

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:36:47PM +0100, Jose Kahan wrote: > > It's been a couple of months (if not more) that the 3rd party > module repo is unavailable. the last discussion I saw about > this site dates from Nov 2016, where people were talking about > moderation, spambots, and making a new

Re: modules.apache.org is down

And remove/update the reference to it off http://httpd.apache.org/modules/ On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Jose Kahan wrote: > Hi, > > It's been a couple of months (if not more) that the 3rd party > module repo is unavailable. the last discussion I saw about > this site

Re: modules.apache.org sold my e-mail address to spammers

Hi Paul, Thanks for the detailed response... sounds like I was jumping to conclusions. Looking forward to seeing a new modules website soon. -- Matthew Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 20:22 -0700, Matthew Lloyd wrote: Dear Apache

Re: Modules.apache.org development mailing list!!!!

On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Ryan Bloom wrote: While we are at it, Covalent has decided to open archives.covalent.net so that people can hack on that site as well. Once we get a group of people on the mailing list to discuss how we want to do modules.apache.org, we can decide if and how we want to

Re: Modules.apache.org development mailing list!

According to Sander van Zoest: It used to be at http://archive.covalent.net/ and was also reachable via http://mail-archives.apache.org/ but this got lost in the downtime and office move. We should probably update the IP so mail-archives.apache.org works again. Although most people use MARC

RE: Modules.apache.org development mailing list!

According to Sander van Zoest: It used to be at http://archive.covalent.net/ and was also reachable via http://mail-archives.apache.org/ but this got lost in the downtime and office move. We should probably update the IP so mail-archives.apache.org works again. Although most people

Re: modules.apache.org

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 03:00:52PM -0800, Sander Temme wrote: Can you send me a traceroute from where you are? I can't promise that I can do anything with it, but it'll be interesting to know where the packets flow when they are so slow. Funny, I just tried it and it seems to be fast as hell

Re: modules.apache.org

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:44:16PM +0100, Thomas Eibner wrote: Are there any projects regarding modules.apache.org that will require development effort? I'd be interested in helping if that is the case. IMHO a cleanup of the current entries is much more needed than big changes to the look

Re: modules.apache.org

On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Ryan Bloom wrote: This has historically been a Covalent hosted and driven project, as a service to the Apache community. Covalent has decided to open that project up to the community to improve. To that end, sometime next week, I will be setting up a machine as a web

RE: modules.apache.org

On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Ryan Bloom wrote: This has historically been a Covalent hosted and driven project, as a service to the Apache community. Covalent has decided to open that project up to the community to improve. To that end, sometime next week, I will be setting up a machine as a

RE: modules.apache.org

This has historically been a Covalent hosted and driven project, as a service to the Apache community. Covalent has decided to open that project up to the community to improve. To that end, sometime next week, I will be setting up a machine as a web server and CVS server to be

Re: modules.apache.org

Ryan Bloom wrote: Everything will be setup with a BSD license. Curious; why not ASF? -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ Millennium hand and shrimp!

Re: modules.apache.org

Mads Toftum wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:44:16PM +0100, Thomas Eibner wrote: Are there any projects regarding modules.apache.org that will require development effort? I'd be interested in helping if that is the case. IMHO a cleanup of the current entries is much more needed than big

Re: modules.apache.org

On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:08:38AM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote: even easier a nightly cron job which does a HEAD on the URL link. if it 404's x in a row it gets marked as old if it 404's for a week/month it gets deleted what are you planning to write this in JSP/perl/PHP ? or a custom apache

Re: modules.apache.org

On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 06:18:15PM +0100, Thomas Eibner wrote: Already a lot of ideas floating around, maybe it would be good to get a mailinglist set up for discussion on it? +1 -aaron

RE: modules.apache.org

Mads Toftum wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:44:16PM +0100, Thomas Eibner wrote: Are there any projects regarding modules.apache.org that will require development effort? I'd be interested in helping if that is the case. IMHO a cleanup of the current entries is much more needed than

RE: modules.apache.org

On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:08:38AM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote: even easier a nightly cron job which does a HEAD on the URL link. if it 404's x in a row it gets marked as old if it 404's for a week/month it gets deleted what are you planning to write this in JSP/perl/PHP ? or a custom

Re: modules.apache.org

On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:40:49AM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote: I know, but I don't have a machine yet. I'm not going to have the box ready until next Wednesday. I just wanted to give a quick heads up and get people thinking. I would get things setup sooner, but I have a major deadline this

Re: modules.apache.org

Ryan Bloom wrote: That machine will be hosted by Covalent, and accounts on that machine will be given out as it makes sense. For the time being, I will be admin'ing the machine in my spare time, so things may take a while to get kick-started. Please colour me interested in helping.. --

Re: modules.apache.org

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:30:28PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Ryan Bloom wrote: That machine will be hosted by Covalent, and accounts on that machine will be given out as it makes sense. For the time being, I will be admin'ing the machine in my spare time, so things may take

RE: modules.apache.org

Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 645 Howard St. [EMAIL PROTECTED] San Francisco, CA -Original Message- From: Thomas Eibner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: modules.apache.org On Tue, Feb 12

Re: modules.apache.org

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:48:10AM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote: The hope is that we will replace the entire look and feel of the modules.apache.org site. I am hoping that once I have the machine up and running, I can create a mailing list, and we can all discuss our goals for the site at that

Re: modules.apache.org

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:41:20PM +0100, Martin Kraemer wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:48:10AM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote: The hope is that we will replace the entire look and feel of the modules.apache.org site. I am hoping that once I have the machine up and running, I can create a

Re: modules.apache.org

Hopefully it will be better connected (at least for european users, the current modules.apache.org is dead slow and unreliable). Can you send me a traceroute from where you are? I can't promise that I can do anything with it, but it'll be interesting to know where the packets flow when they