On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:15:43AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > http://people.heanet.ie/~colmmacc/manual/misc/cachingguide.html.en
> >
> >Which is about half done. Comments & contributions welcome.
>
> Looks good. A few comments:
>
> See docs like env.html, sections.html, and logs.html for an
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
In this spirit, a major new feature of httpd-2.2 will be reliably
working Caching, but the documentation on Caching is a bit tough on
users right now. I'm currently working on this;
http://people.heanet.ie/~colmmacc/manual/misc/cachingguide.html.
Joe Orton wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 07:51:48AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Joe Orton wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 03:07:03PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > > > On Aug 19, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> > > > >I said initially that you will have a problems with
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 07:51:48AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 03:07:03PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > > On Aug 19, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> > > >I said initially that you will have a problems with that patch.
> > > >Since you don
Joe Orton wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 03:07:03PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > On Aug 19, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> > >I said initially that you will have a problems with that patch.
> > >Since you don't have a windows platform, someone else might
> > >test that too. I'm on v
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 03:07:03PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Aug 19, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> >I said initially that you will have a problems with that patch.
> >Since you don't have a windows platform, someone else might
> >test that too. I'm on vacation starting tomorrow, so
On Aug 19, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
The hook gets called in post_config, but not in create_config.
Of course if you move it to the post_config the config will
not work, because the array is still uninitialized.
Think it's a hook related stuff and .dll loading
Jim Jagielski wrote:
The hook gets called in post_config, but not in create_config.
Of course if you move it to the post_config the config will
not work, because the array is still uninitialized.
Think it's a hook related stuff and .dll loading.
That is seriously weird... The proxy_run_load_l
Mladen Turk wrote:
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> > On Aug 19, 2005, at 12:45 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> >
> >> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is weird... Can you Email me your config file? No need
> >>> to send it to the list.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Any lbmethod is failing and the conf->lbmethods-
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 19, 2005, at 12:45 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
This is weird... Can you Email me your config file? No need
to send it to the list.
Any lbmethod is failing and the conf->lbmethods->nelts is 0.
The add_lbmethods hook is never called.
Off the to
On Aug 19, 2005, at 12:45 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
This is weird... Can you Email me your config file? No need
to send it to the list.
Any lbmethod is failing and the conf->lbmethods->nelts is 0.
The add_lbmethods hook is never called.
Off the top of my head I can't f
Jim Jagielski wrote:
This is weird... Can you Email me your config file? No need
to send it to the list.
Any lbmethod is failing and the conf->lbmethods->nelts is 0.
The add_lbmethods hook is never called.
BalancerMember http://localhost:8080
ProxySet lbmethod="byrequests"
ProxySet l
On Aug 19, 2005, at 11:56 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Is it a scope issue because find_best_bytraffic is defined
as static...? Hmmm. I need to look into that.
Perhaps the problem is because on windows the config is
run twice.
It is on Unix as well.
Also seems that the
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Is it a scope issue because find_best_bytraffic is defined
as static...? Hmmm. I need to look into that.
Perhaps the problem is because on windows the config is
run twice.
Also seems that the hook is never run, or is run only once:
For example:
ProxySet lbmethod="byreque
Mladen Turk wrote:
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> >
> > I've confirmed that without that hack, the server works fine
> > and as expected... I'm not sure, but I would almost
> > bet that it was due not all required *.o's being
> > rebuilt, and the hook in mod_proxy not being called
> > when you t
On Aug 19, 2005, at 11:05 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
What platform... seems to work fine under Linux and OS X.
Windows
This is what add_lbmethods does...
It adds the method, but remember, the widows don't have fork,
so probably the data from parent is not there.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I've confirmed that without that hack, the server works fine
and as expected... I'm not sure, but I would almost
bet that it was due not all required *.o's being
rebuilt, and the hook in mod_proxy not being called
when you tested.
Can others confirm one way or another?
Jim Jagielski wrote:
What platform... seems to work fine under Linux and OS X.
Windows
This is what add_lbmethods does...
It adds the method, but remember, the widows don't have fork,
so probably the data from parent is not there.
Did you do a complete make diskclean and then rebuild?
Joe Orton wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 10:17:45AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Well, what do you know. The balancer had never had any test cases
> > at ALL in httpd-test...
>
> A you've blown my sarcasm inhibitor now cap'n, I can't help it...
>
> Gee, really? Would that be why nob
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 10:17:45AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Well, what do you know. The balancer had never had any test cases
> at ALL in httpd-test...
A you've blown my sarcasm inhibitor now cap'n, I can't help it...
Gee, really? Would that be why nobody seems sure whether it actually
Well, what do you know. The balancer had never had any test cases
at ALL in httpd-test... Guess we should strip out the whole shebang
since there was never a test that it ever worked... :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAI
Joe Orton wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:50:24AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> > On Aug 19, 2005, at 9:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> > >What platform... seems to work fine under Linux and OS X.
> > >
> > >This is what add_lbmethods does...
> > >
> > >Did you do a complete make dis
In this spirit, a major new feature of httpd-2.2 will be reliably
working Caching, but the documentation on Caching is a bit tough on
users right now. I'm currently working on this;
http://people.heanet.ie/~colmmacc/manual/misc/cachingguide.html.en
Which is about half done. Comments & contribu
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:50:24AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2005, at 9:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> >What platform... seems to work fine under Linux and OS X.
> >
> >This is what add_lbmethods does...
> >
> >Did you do a complete make diskclean and then rebuild?
> >
>
> I've
On Aug 19, 2005, at 9:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
What platform... seems to work fine under Linux and OS X.
This is what add_lbmethods does...
Did you do a complete make diskclean and then rebuild?
I've confirmed that without that hack, the server works fine
and as expected... I'm not sure
What platform... seems to work fine under Linux and OS X.
This is what add_lbmethods does...
Did you do a complete make diskclean and then rebuild?
On Aug 19, 2005, at 8:06 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch
from
tru
Paul Querna wrote:
Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week. I intend to
include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this release.
As long as 2.1.7 seems good, I would like to do a vote on making it a Beta.
I have
Paul Querna wrote:
Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week. I intend to
include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this release.
As long as 2.1.7 seems good, I would like to do a vote on making it a Beta.
OK. I
Paul Querna wrote:
Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week. I intend to
include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this release.
-- Build started: Project: mod_setenvif, Configuration: Release
Win32 --
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 06:28:56PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
> At 03:36 AM 8/18/2005, Joe Orton wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:43:01PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
> >> Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
> >> trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At 12:43 AM 8/18/2005, Paul Querna wrote:
>
>>Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
>>trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week. I intend to
>>include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this release.
>
>
> Note you can't tag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'ers...
As Paul mentions below, on Friday (probably 1 a.m. ;-) he will
tag 2.1.7. This is just a reminder to our most excellent doco
team that, once ack'ed - this becomes 2.1 beta, and then...
(drum roll please...) 2.2 GA(!)
So if you had changes to catch up with 2.1 that perhap
At 12:43 AM 8/18/2005, Paul Querna wrote:
>Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
>trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week. I intend to
>include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this release.
Note you can't tag the recent commit to mod_dir, there
is a ve
At 03:36 AM 8/18/2005, Joe Orton wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:43:01PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
>> Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
>> trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week. I intend to
>> include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this releas
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:43:01PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
> Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
> trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week. I intend to
> include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this release.
Sounds great. Can you exclude the mod_s
Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week. I intend to
include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this release.
As long as 2.1.7 seems good, I would like to do a vote on making it a Beta.
Thanks,
-Paul
36 matches
Mail list logo
