On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 11:27 AM William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 10:23 AM Daniel Ruggeri
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, all;
>>I'm not sure what mechanism is used to generate
>> https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html from
>>
>
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 10:23 AM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
>I'm not sure what mechanism is used to generate
> https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html from
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/site/trunk/content/security/vulnerabilities-ht
Hi, all;
I'm not sure what mechanism is used to generate
https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/site/trunk/content/security/vulnerabilities-httpd.xml,
but an anomaly has been reported to me in response to the security
announce
Added:
>> release/httpd/CURRENT-IS-2.4.39
>> Removed:
>> release/httpd/CURRENT-IS-2.4.38
>> Modified:
>> release/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
>> release/httpd/Announcement2.4.txt
>>
>> Modified: release/httpd/Announcement2.4.ht
ttpd/CURRENT-IS-2.4.38
> Modified:
> release/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
> release/httpd/Announcement2.4.txt
>
> Modified: release/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
> ==
> --- release/httpd/Announcement2.4.html (orig
Ping again. This is a really simple patch.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 12:26 AM Andras Farkas
wrote:
>
> Ping.
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62989
> It's on the bugzilla too now.
Intibated Apache Source Pure
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018, 9:27 PM Andras Farkas
wrote:
> Ping.
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62989
> It's on the bugzilla too now.
>
Ping.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62989
It's on the bugzilla too now.
> stuff.
> If I were to refactor the error messages, I'd be looking to take all remaining
> actual HTML out of the server itself, and into documents (or templates) under
> the control of the sysop.
Invalid HTML is inherently wrong, and there's also no need to tell
browse
> On 6 Dec 2018, at 11:34, Andras Farkas wrote:
>
> Ping.
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:08 AM Andras Farkas
> wrote:
>>
>> Evening!
>>
>> I noticed that most of the time, when Apache httpd itself generates
>> HTML output (like for 404 pages and
Ping.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:08 AM Andras Farkas wrote:
>
> Evening!
>
> I noticed that most of the time, when Apache httpd itself generates
> HTML output (like for 404 pages and autoindex pages) it uses ancient
> HTML 2.0 and HTML 3.2 doctypes.
> These 11 attached dif
Evening!
I noticed that most of the time, when Apache httpd itself generates
HTML output (like for 404 pages and autoindex pages) it uses ancient
HTML 2.0 and HTML 3.2 doctypes.
These 11 attached diffs update those. The most important of the diffs
is httpdh.diff
I compiled and tested these diffs
$curl, CURLOPT_HEADER, 1);
> curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER, 0);
> curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_URL, $url);
> curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER, $curl_header);
>
> Am 07.08.2017 um 11:12 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> AddOutputFilterByType DEF
curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_HEADER, 1);
curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER, 0);
curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_URL, $url);
curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER, $curl_header);
Am 07.08.2017 um 11:12 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Hi
AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html
is this a bug or someh
Hi
AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html
is this a bug or somehow expected behavior that in case the
"Content-Type" header also contains a charset mod_defalte don't work as
expected which means in case of curl requests only static files are gzip
compressed while PHP respon
ation
is to call out "security defects and enhancements" or omit httpoxy
from the primary
announcement text
> Modified:
> dev/httpd/Announcement2.2.html
> dev/httpd/Announcement2.2.txt
The draft is at
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/Announcement2.2.html
http://httpd.apa
2016-12-21 19:20 GMT+01:00 Eric Covener :
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Jacob Champion
> wrote:
> > On 12/21/2016 10:01 AM, jchamp...@apache.org wrote:
> >>
> >> Log:
> >> 2.4.25: give the Announcement HTML a face-lift
> >>
> >> Mo
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On 12/21/2016 10:01 AM, jchamp...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> Log:
>> 2.4.25: give the Announcement HTML a face-lift
>>
>> Move from HTML 3.2 into the brave new world of CSS. Add the new project
>> logo a
On 12/21/2016 10:01 AM, jchamp...@apache.org wrote:
Log:
2.4.25: give the Announcement HTML a face-lift
Move from HTML 3.2 into the brave new world of CSS. Add the new project
logo and a date to the announcement.
So, I was bold and checked in a facelift to the whole page when I added
the new
welcomed
>>
>> Modified:
>> dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
>> dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.txt
>>
>
> I'll take the Announcement live on the hour (30 min from now), anyone
> who wants to edit, the path is a little unusual;
>
> https://dist.ap
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 12:13 PM, wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Tue Dec 20 18:13:12 2016
> New Revision: 17503
>
> Log:
> Record security errata, edits in the next 45 minutes are most welcomed
>
> Modified:
> dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
> dev/httpd/An
ttpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_http2.html
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_http2.html.en
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_http2.xml.meta
Huh?
nd
--
Das einzige, das einen Gebäudekollaps (oder auch einen
thermon
nship with a table. After
running through proxy, the resultant HTML always moves the child nodes of the
hyperlink up to be a sibling of the hyperlink instead of remaining children.
E.g. becomes Example appears below, although
other flavors exist such as a hyperlink within a table text here
bec
syntax that looks like:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LoadModule substitute_module modules/mod_substitute.so
LoadModule autoindex_module modules/mod_autoindex.so
Hello!
I'm trying to make some substitutions on the HTML-output generated by
mod_autoindex.
However, things quietly do not work... Even the simplest directive:
Substitute s/Parent/Father/
seems ignored -- and the browser is showing "Parent Directory" instead of
"Fa
Hi,
the patch was missing in my previous mail. See attachment.
Regards,
Micha
On 19.03.2014 22:26, Micha Lenk wrote:
Hi Apache developers,
In HTML you can have tags that have a background image by
providing a style attribute. E.g. this can be done by something fancy
like this:
http
Hi Apache developers,
In HTML you can have tags that have a background image by
providing a style attribute. E.g. this can be done by something fancy
like this:
http://www.example.com/fancy-background.png)
right 0px no-repeat; height:325px;">
Currently mod_proxy_html doesn'
Hi,
On 19.03.2014 21:19, Jim Jagielski wrote:
It's always best, imo, to follow-up with a bugzilla entry with
description and patch.
Ok, this issue is now filed in ASF bugzilla as #56286.
Regards,
Micha
Hi again,
Err, #56287 that is.
Regards,
Micha
On 19.03.2014 22:05, Micha Lenk wrote:
Just for the records, I've just filed this issue in ASF bugzilla as
issue #56286.
SVN (best both, trunk and
then backported to 2.4). This is something that I feel to owe the Apache
httpd community.
So, lets first start with a bug that lets mod_proxy_html delete the
wrong data from HTML code when a "http-equiv" meta tag specifies a
Content-Type behind any other &
It's always best, imo, to follow-up with a bugzilla entry with
description and patch.
Thx!!
On Mar 19, 2014, at 3:58 PM, Micha Lenk wrote:
> Hi Apache developers,
>
> next is a bug that causes mod_proxy_html to add some random characters (+html
> code) to HTML pages, i
Hi Apache developers,
next is a bug that causes mod_proxy_html to add some random characters
(+html code) to HTML pages, if the document is smaller than 4 bytes.
(Thomas, Ewald, this is issue #18378 in our Mantis). It looks like the
output is from some kind of uninitialized memory. The added
a bug that lets mod_proxy_html delete the
wrong data from HTML code when a "http-equiv" meta tag specifies a
Content-Type behind any other "http-equiv" meta tag (Thomas, Ewald, this
is issue #21648 in our Mantis). For better understanding of the issue,
please consider the follo
the next one with his vendetta
i just *asked* consider post plain text
nothing more
Am 10.03.2014 00:32, schrieb Nick Edwards:
> Truer words were never spoken about Harald Reindl, this person brings
> trouble to every mailing list he joins
>
> postfix - banned
read the history
> fedora - modera
Truer words were never spoken about Harald Reindl, this person brings
trouble to every mailing list he joins
postfix - banned
fedora - moderation
centos - moderation/banned
roundcube - moderation
dovecot - final warnings
and they are just the lists I know of, and when moderated he is known
to sen
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 08.03.2014 01:38, schrieb Noel Butler:
>> This will be dealt with off list
>
> with the words below which are only a part of the off-list reply
It should be kept off-list. Just stop.
warning your the only one who will regret it
>> stop your personal vendetta - the only one playing internet cop is you
>>
>> i have asked in a nice way to not post HTML and explained why
>> the other person had no problem with my question / hin
> Original-Nachricht
This will be dealt with off list
On 08/03/2014 09:51, Reindl Harald wrote:
> what exactly is your personal problem?
> can you please post plaintext instead HTML to lists
you did see the word "please"?
>> for me such messages are unreadable after medical operations on
what exactly is your personal problem?
>> can you please post plaintext instead HTML to lists
you did see the word "please"?
>> for me such messages are unreadable after medical operations
>> on both eyes because you override my MUA font settings
you understood
e bylaws of this mailing list
> > that use of HTML is something to apologize for?
>
> nearly any mailing-list has it written clear, some even reject HTML
> and on some others you get warned by the owner (postfix as example)
>
> https://www.google.com/search?q=mailing+list+eti
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 12:58 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
> On 07.03.2014 12:28, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> >
> > Sorry, this was posted from gmail...
>
> Is it written anywhere in the bylaws of this mailing list, that use of
> HTML is something to apologize for? With all d
Am 07.03.2014 18:58, schrieb Mikhail T.:
> On 07.03.2014 12:28, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> Sorry, this was posted from gmail...
> Is it written anywhere in the bylaws of this mailing list
> that use of HTML is something to apologize for?
nearly any mailing-list has it written clear, s
On 07.03.2014 12:28, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Sorry, this was posted from gmail...
Is it written anywhere in the bylaws of this mailing list, that use of HTML is
something to apologize for? With all due sympathies to Reindl's medical
condition, why must we -- in the second decade of the 21st
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:59 AM, wrote:
> Author: trawick
> Date: Tue Feb 21 14:59:07 2012
> New Revision: 1291829
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1291829&view=rev
> Log:
> generated file from r1291828
>
> Added:
> httpd/site/trunk/docs/securit
On 2/21/2012 3:26 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> - NOTE: Windows users may have problems with Apache httpd 2.4.1 and
>> - SSL. As such, Apache 2.4.x is currently not recommended for
>> - Windows servers.
>> + NOTE to Windows users: AcceptFilter None has replaced
>> DisableWin32Accept
On 21.02.2012 09:44, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Feb 21 08:44:06 2012
New Revision: 503
Modified:
dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.txt
Modified: dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
fic than Jim's first draft.
>
> Modified:
> dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
> dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.txt
>
> Modified: dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
> ======
> --- dev/httpd/Announce
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:19:43 -0400
Joshua Marantz wrote:
> mod_pagespeed's event-driven HTML parser is open source, and is
> written in C++:
There are quite a few around in C++, Boost also has (at least) one.
--
"Enthusiasm is not the enemy of the intellect." (said
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:58:07 +0800 (CST)
"Whut Jia" wrote:
> Hi,
> Thank you!
> But I want to parse a jsp page in my handler.How can I do it??
I've never used .jps but it looks to me like all the processing
instructions are in the form <% instruction %>. If that's the case,
the simple parser I
On 02.08.2010 15:47, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
--- httpd/site/trunk/docs/security/vulnerabilities-oval.xml (original)
+++ httpd/site/trunk/docs/security/vulnerabilities-oval.xml Mon Aug 2 13:03:04
2010
@@ -714,6 +714,31 @@ to cross-site scrip
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> >--- httpd/site/trunk/docs/security/vulnerabilities-oval.xml (original)
> >+++ httpd/site/trunk/docs/security/vulnerabilities-oval.xml Mon Aug 2
> >13:03:04 2010
> >@@ -714,6 +714,31 @@ to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. >
> >
.xml
httpd/site/trunk/docs/security/vulnerabilities_22.html
httpd/site/trunk/xdocs/security/vulnerabilities-httpd.xml
Modified: httpd/site/trunk/docs/security/vulnerabilities-oval.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/site/trunk/docs/security/vulnerabilities-oval.xml?rev=981498&r1=9
On 3/7/2010 2:12 PM, m...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: mjc
> Date: Sun Mar 7 20:12:21 2010
> New Revision: 920084
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920084&view=rev
> Log:
> Just make it clear this is a flaw only affecting Windows
> installations that use mod_isapi. These entries need a bi
On 3/6/2010 6:52 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> --- dev/httpd/Announcement2.2.html (original)
>> +++ dev/httpd/Announcement2.2.html Sat Mar 6 07:41:31 2010
>> @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@
>>APR-util library version 1.3.9, bundled with the tar and zip
>> distributions.
>
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:41 AM, wrote:
> Author: trawick
> Date: Sat Mar 6 07:41:31 2010
> New Revision: 94
>
> Log:
> minor tweaks, especially to mention continued compatibility with APR 1.3
>
> Modified:
> dev/httpd/Announcement2.2.html
> dev/httpd/Announc
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> The security aspect of the bundling of APR and APR-util needs to be
> tweaked. Does this look right?
It does, thanks for taking a look.
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
re the announcement for httpd v2.2.14.
>
> SvnPubSub works great :)
>
> Would it be possible for someone to eyeball these changes and make sure
> I didn't miss anything out or break anything?
>
The security aspect of the bundling of APR and APR-util ne
minf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Mon Oct 5 20:11:21 2009
> New Revision: 821989
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=821989&view=rev
> Log:
> Prepare the announcement for httpd v2.2.14.
SvnPubSub works great :)
Would it be possible for someone to eyeball these changes a
2009/8/8 :
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Sat Aug 8 16:09:45 2009
> New Revision: 802411
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=802411&view=rev
> Log:
> Prepare for release after 5 +1's no -1's.
>
> Modified:
>httpd/site/trunk/build.props
>
ttpd/site/trunk/build.props
> httpd/site/trunk/dist/Announcement2.2.html
> httpd/site/trunk/dist/Announcement2.2.txt
> httpd/site/trunk/dist/binaries/win32/README.html
> httpd/site/trunk/xdocs/doap.rdf
> httpd/site/trunk/xdocs/download.xml
>
> Modified: ht
HTTP User and Desktop Security Communities;
With respect to http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29112
Per http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt
3.7.1 Canonicalization and Text Defaults
[...]
The "charset" parameter is used with some media types to define the
character set (section 3.4) of the
Eric,
once a year, forwarding notices from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I completely screw up and let autocomplete pick up dev@ - I'm sorry this just
occurred and want to be certain you are aware ASAP!
Fortunately it does seem to be a local access junction, most router hardware
will le
/ignore - sorry for the noise.
Original Message
Subject: Re: HTML request accesses my router
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:17:59 -0500
From: Eric Maurier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Ross-Tech.com
To: Apache Security Response Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Uwe
Question; it was fairly clear folks were fine with removing 1.3 binaries (still
hooking things up correctly as I type) for Win32.
It seems rational to drop Netware and OS2, but I'm not a stakeholder of either.
It's up to you maintainers if you feel we should keep shipping netware and OS2
Apache 1
Mark J Cox wrote:
>> This killed the list of vulnerabilities for all versions. Was this intended?
>> And if yes, where can they be found now?
>
> Must be someone with bad java foo, fixing.
>
Er. ya. It wasn't my intention to break stuff, I just ran build.sh and
it kept saying it wanted to do thi
> This killed the list of vulnerabilities for all versions. Was this intended?
> And if yes, where can they be found now?
Must be someone with bad java foo, fixing.
Mark
--
Mark J Cox | www.awe.com/mark
On 05/01/2006 03:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: pquerna
> Date: Sun Apr 30 18:32:18 2006
> New Revision: 398494
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398494&view=rev
> Log:
> rebuild all.
>
> Modified:
> httpd/site/trunk/docs/security/v
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mjc
Date: Fri Apr 7 02:58:47 2006
New Revision: 392234
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=392234&view=rev
Log:
Revert revision 392230. wrowe correctly points out that
cve-2005-2088 didn't affect apache 1.3, and indeed I've mailed
people that thought it di
> 1.3 was UNAFFECTED
Yes, indeed it was me that insisted that this didn't affect 1.3, I'll
revert it :)
Cheers, Mark
PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mjc
Date: Fri Apr 7 02:39:36 2006
New Revision: 392230
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=392230&view=rev
Log:
From: Mike O'Connor
Subject: Apacheweek security minor addition, I think
I think http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_13.html
should
Am Mittwoch, den 29.03.2006, 00:16 -0500 schrieb Miso G.:
> And as far as caching those images/links goes, I need them to be
> pre-loaded for the user that is viewing the html page, not the other
> users after him. Sort of like pre-fetching the links in advance, in case
> the use
Ok, I'll look into those modules mentioned, thanks!
And as far as caching those images/links goes, I need them to be
pre-loaded for the user that is viewing the html page, not the other
users after him. Sort of like pre-fetching the links in advance, in case
the user decides to visit a
On Monday 27 March 2006 00:01, Miso G. wrote:
> Has anyone created a filter that parses html for let's say links to
> images only already? Or are there any examples on the web of similar
> filters (if so, where?).
mod_accessibility, mod_proxy_html, mod_publisher all filter HTML an
Has anyone created a filter that parses html for let's say links to
images only already? Or are there any examples on the web of similar
filters (if so, where?).
What I am trying to achieve is create a filter/module that will gather
all the links to images from html pages before the
I read the announce today...
not quite sure what part of the message below wasn't clear, but no, the
compiled httpd.exe simply won't work on any flavor of Win32 I'm aware of.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/dist/Announcement21.txt?rev=279680&r1=279679&
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/dist/Announcement21.txt?rev=279680&r1=279679&r2=279680&view=diff
==
--- httpd/httpd/dist/Announcement21.txt (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/dist/Announcement21.txt Thu Sep 8 17:5
Title: Error with Apache 1.x web servers while posting data from one HTML page to another HTML page
Hi
I have two HTML pages hosted on Apache 1.3.33 web server on Solaris.
The first HTML page have some text fields and a submit button. On clicking the button this HTML page should posts
Hi
I have two HTML pages hosted on Apache 1.3.33 web server on Solaris. The
first HTML page have some text fields and a submit button. On clicking
the button this HTML page should posts the data to second HTML page.
This has been done by specifying path for the second HTML page in the
action
ew=rev&rev=106690
Log:
Upgraded the copy of PCRE within srclib/pcre to version 5.0
Added:
httpd/httpd/trunk/srclib/pcre/doc/html/
- copied from r106688, httpd/httpd/vendor/pcre/5.0/doc/html/
httpd/httpd/trunk/srclib/pcre/doc/html/index.html
- copied unchanged from r106688,
httpd/httpd/v
At 04:49 PM 11/7/2004, André Malo wrote:
>* "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>Well, but it's still the 2.1 branch with 2.1 docs (docs-2.1/). And, of course,
>once tagged and released (as alpha, beta, whatever) it *is* public. Though not
>stable. That's a difference :)
That's your
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
> * Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > BTW, the "what is a comment" problem is easier than it looks, as both
> >
* "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> pquerna 2004/11/06 22:01:50
> >>
> >> Added: docs/manual new_features_2_2.html
> >> new_features_2_2.html.en
> >>
* Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, the "what is a comment" problem is easier than it looks, as both
>
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> pquerna 2004/11/06 22:01:50
>>
>> Added: docs/manual new_features_2_2.html
>> new_features_2_2.html.en
>> new_features_2_2.xml new_features_2_2.xml.meta
>> Log:
>> First Swi
André Malo wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pquerna 2004/11/06 22:01:50
Added: docs/manual new_features_2_2.html new_features_2_2.html.en
new_features_2_2.xml new_features_2_2.xml.meta
Log:
First Swing at a 2.0 -> 2.2 New Features Document.
As long as we j
strates
that there is a demand for byte count reduction. mod_deflate uses a
great deal more CPU, and achieves a great deal more savings, than any
of the above.
> I mean really, how much bandwidth
> from *html* are we talking about? Compared to images? If you start
> parsing the h
blem (assuming that the "what's a
comment and what isn't" problem is solvable) is that this kind of parsing
takes a disproportionately large amount of CPU time with respect to the
amount of network bandwidth it saves. I mean really, how much bandwidth
from *html* are we talkin
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Tobias Skytte wrote:
Why not introduce and option to remove the
> comments from the served file?
You have that option from mod_xmlns, mod_proxy_html or mod_publisher,
to name but three. Along with caveats about why it's not necessarily
a good idea.
--
Nick Kew
* "Tobias Skytte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many webpages include alot of comments in the html code. Sometimes this
> can me more than 50% of the file! At the same time the internet is getting
> more and more congested. Why not introduce and option to remove
Hi,
Many webpages include alot of comments in the html code. Sometimes this
can me more than 50% of the file! At the same time the internet is getting
more and more congested. Why not introduce and option to remove the
comments from the served file? The person web-browsing any given site has
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> pquerna 2004/11/06 22:01:50
>
> Added: docs/manual new_features_2_2.html new_features_2_2.html.en
> new_features_2_2.xml new_features_2_2.xml.meta
> Log:
> First Swing at a 2.0 -> 2.2 New Features Document
Please see http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/docsformat.html.
> Hi all,
>
> does anybody know how to regenerate the html version of the manual once I made
> changes to the xml sources of
> the manual?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> R
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rüdiger Plüm) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> does anybody know how to regenerate the html version of the manual once I
> made changes to the xml sources of the manual?
Sure. See <http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/docsformat.html>. If you have
questions, jus
Hi all,
does anybody know how to regenerate the html version of the manual once I made changes
to the xml sources of
the manual?
Thanks in advance
Rüdiger
Hi,
I would like to use an html Parser in my apache module.
Is there any well-known html parser to do this..?
Do i need to recompile the apache web server in order to use this parser...?
I found the old/net/libxml2/HTMLparser.c, what am i have to do to expand the
apache web server...(recompile
,
the .exp file being the httpd.exp
I got the clue from
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg34607.html
so I try to build with
perl Makefile.PL \
APACHE_SRC=../apache_1.3.27/src \
DO_HTTPD=1 \
USE_APACI=1 \
EVERYTHING=1 \
APACI_ARGS='--enable-module=so&#x
Patrick Lam wrote:
Dear all:
I have the following lines in my httpd.conf file:
-
ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ "/usr/local/cgi-bin/"
Options +ExecCGI
AllowOverride All
--
However, I happen to have some .html files inside the /cgi-bin/
Patrick,
The
cgi-bin directory is meant for scripts by default bcoz of the setting mentioned
in httpd.conf. The default document root is /htdocs if you
place the html files in this directory you can view them thru browser using the
URL:
http://servername:port/my.html
my.html is your
Dear all:
I have the following lines in my httpd.conf file:
-
ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ “/usr/local/cgi-bin/”
Options
+ExecCGI
AllowOverride
All
--
However, I happen to have some .html files inside the
/cgi-bin
Announcement to go out tommorow, after the mirrors have caught up.
Thanks all, glad to hear the success stories, and hopefully we will have
a cleaner binbuild script to work from this coming 2.0.46 release :-)
Bill
>wrowe 2003/03/31 23:40:19
>
> Modified:.Announcem
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
