Looking, begging, pleading for tests and votes :)
On 2016-05-12 16:33, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking, begging, pleading for tests and votes :)
Yup! You got mine.
Side question that popped into my mind as I was reviewing the code...
Would it make sense to have a "transitional" status for the time between
0 failures and when hcfails threshold
> On May 14, 2016, at 9:28 PM, drugg...@primary.net wrote:
>
> On 2016-05-12 16:33, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Looking, begging, pleading for tests and votes :)
>
> Yup! You got mine.
THANKS! This feature seemed to cause a lot of buzz @ ApacheCon so
would be very very nice to have in 2.4.21.
> Si
On 5/16/2016 8:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> THANKS! This feature seemed to cause a lot of buzz @ ApacheCon so
> would be
I believe I heard and/or used the term "sexy" at least once to describe
it ;-)
On 5/16/2016 8:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Hmmm... The balancer-manager page does display the
> On May 16, 2016, at 3:37 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> On 5/16/2016 8:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> THANKS! This feature seemed to cause a lot of buzz @ ApacheCon so
>> would be
>
> I believe I heard and/or used the term "sexy" at least once to describe
> it ;-)
>
>
> On 5/16/2016 8:19 AM,
Jim,
how do you see the possibility of other proxy modules providing their own hc?
HTTP/2 has this nice PING frame that is intended for exactly this.
Cheers,
Stefan
PS. Btw. it's accepted for backport, left the actual work for you...
> Am 17.05.2016 um 12:41 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
>
>> O
Seems like adding that directly to the module itself makes the most sense.
Later versions
will allow for using Provider API to make it easier to add various checks,
On 2016-05-17 05:17, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Jim,
>
> how do you see the possibility of other proxy modules providing their own h