Re: ping on mod_dns

2008-02-19 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:30:30AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: I propose mod_domain to match the IANA port number assignment. +1, especially since that way we don't have to listen to Paul Vixie ;) -- Colm MacCárthaighPublic Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ping on mod_dns

2008-02-19 Thread Mads Toftum
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:30:30AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: I propose mod_domain to match the IANA port number assignment. Seems more confusing than mod_named. vh Mads Toftum -- http://soulfood.dk

Re: ping on mod_dns

2008-02-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
I propose mod_domain to match the IANA port number assignment. On Feb 18, 2008, at 5:49 PM, Jorge Schrauwen wrote: true but like Roy said if mod_dns is allready in use a new name will need to be found no? On Feb 18, 2008 8:42 PM, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jorge

Re: ping on mod_dns

2008-02-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Mads Toftum wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:30:30AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: I propose mod_domain to match the IANA port number assignment. Seems more confusing than mod_named. I didn't care for mod_named (we haven't been suffixing the 'd'aemon most of the time), was actually

Re: ping on mod_dns

2008-02-19 Thread Issac Goldstand
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Mads Toftum wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:30:30AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: I propose mod_domain to match the IANA port number assignment. Seems more confusing than mod_named. I didn't care for mod_named (we haven't been suffixing the 'd'aemon most of

Re: ping on mod_dns

2008-02-18 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Feb 9, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Issac Goldstand wrote: Any volunteers to import mod_dns so I can eventually start hacking at it again (topic came up at work recently and I have a couple of feature ideas that I'd like to work on, but really don't want to have to work in my old svn + port

Re: ping on mod_dns

2008-02-18 Thread Issac Goldstand
Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Feb 9, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Issac Goldstand wrote: Any volunteers to import mod_dns so I can eventually start hacking at it again (topic came up at work recently and I have a couple of feature ideas that I'd like to work on, but really don't want to have to work in my

Re: ping on mod_dns

2008-02-18 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
If the mod_dns mentioned before is different from the code... may I sugest mod_named? since a lot of people would be famileir with a name like htat. On Feb 18, 2008 8:22 PM, Erik Abele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 18.02.2008, at 20:03, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Feb 9, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Issac

Re: ping on mod_dns

2008-02-18 Thread Issac Goldstand
Jorge Schrauwen wrote: If the mod_dns mentioned before is different from the code... may I sugest mod_named? since a lot of people would be famileir with a name like htat. True, but that would break naming conventions: mod_smtp mod_ftp (mod_proxy_ajp, mod_proxy_http, mod_proxy_ftp) and

Re: ping on mod_dns

2008-02-18 Thread Erik Abele
On 18.02.2008, at 20:03, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Feb 9, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Issac Goldstand wrote: Any volunteers to import mod_dns so I can eventually start hacking at it again (topic came up at work recently and I have a couple of feature ideas that I'd like to work on, but really don't

Re: ping on mod_dns

2008-02-18 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
true but like Roy said if mod_dns is allready in use a new name will need to be found no? On Feb 18, 2008 8:42 PM, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jorge Schrauwen wrote: If the mod_dns mentioned before is different from the code... may I sugest mod_named? since a lot of people

Re: ping on mod_dns

2008-02-18 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Feb 18, 2008 2:49 PM, Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: true but like Roy said if mod_dns is allready in use a new name will need to be found no? The mod_dns listed on Freshmeat looks like it was lasted changed in 2001 and was only for 1.3. We could drop a line to the guy and see if

Re: ping on mod_dns

2008-02-18 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Feb 18, 2008, at 3:39 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Feb 18, 2008 2:49 PM, Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: true but like Roy said if mod_dns is allready in use a new name will need to be found no? The mod_dns listed on Freshmeat looks like it was lasted changed in 2001 and was

Re: ping on mod_dns

2008-02-10 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
Me too, If this gets in experimental I'll probably give it a try sounds really interesting On Feb 10, 2008 2:16 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 10, 2008, at 1:21 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote: Any volunteers to import mod_dns so I can eventually start hacking at it

Re: ping on mod_dns

2008-02-10 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Feb 10, 2008, at 1:21 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote: Any volunteers to import mod_dns so I can eventually start hacking at it again (topic came up at work recently and I have a couple of feature ideas that I'd like to work on, but really don't want to have to work in my old svn + port

Re: ping on mod_dns

2008-02-10 Thread Erik Abele
On 10.02.2008, at 14:16, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: On Feb 10, 2008, at 1:21 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote: Any volunteers to import mod_dns so I can eventually start hacking at it again (topic came up at work recently and I have a couple of feature ideas that I'd like to work on, but really

ping on mod_dns

2008-02-09 Thread Issac Goldstand
Any volunteers to import mod_dns so I can eventually start hacking at it again (topic came up at work recently and I have a couple of feature ideas that I'd like to work on, but really don't want to have to work in my old svn + port changes to asf svn too)? AFAIK, we finished with the red tape