Hi,
The following modules need to be added to the bugzilla system:
mod_ldap
mod_auth_ldap
mod_authn_ldap
mod_authz_ldap
Regards,
Graham
--
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Graham Leggett wrote:
> mod_ldap is a connection pool and query cache, and can be reused by
> other apache modules that require ldap, such as a potential DAV-ldap
> module, or a proxy_ldap module, so no - I'd say a combination would be a
> bad idea.
>
> In addition, combinin
Hi all,
The ProxyTimeout option in mod_proxy does not do anything apart from
setting a config parameter that is never used.
ProxyTimeout was apparently added in v2.0.31 - is it supposed to do
something?
Regards,
Graham
--
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a
Title: Mod_disk_cache garbage-collecting question
Hi there !
I just have a very simple question concerning garbage-collecting under mod_disk_cache.
It doesn't seem to be implemented yet (by the way, is there a deadline for this ?), but there is a CacheSize directive which seems to be base
I am interested in contributing code to mod_rewrite
adding variable expansion in the CondPattern.
Though an experienced programmer, I am not
familiar with the protocols used on a large open
source project such as Apache httpd.
Could someone point me in the right direction
to learn how the s
Hi all,
While testing mod_ldap, I noticed it was creating a shared memory file
like so:
[minfrin@jessica httpd-2.0]$ ls -al /tmp/mod_ldap_cache
-rw-r--r--1 nobody 42949672954 Jan 22 14:09
/tmp/mod_ldap_cache
The groupid is set to 4294967295 - which is bogus.
The default config f
Graham Leggett wrote:
User nobody
Group #-1
I am not sure whether "#-1" is being interpreted as 4294967295, or if
this figure comes from some area of not-previously-initialised variable.
Anyone know what is going on?
Forgot to mention - this is v2.0.45-dev.
Regards,
Graham
--
---
Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> While testing mod_ldap, I noticed it was creating a shared memory file
> like so:
>
> [minfrin@jessica httpd-2.0]$ ls -al /tmp/mod_ldap_cache
> -rw-r--r--1 nobody 42949672954 Jan 22 14:09
> /tmp/mod_ldap_cache
>
> The groupid is set to 4294967
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>I am interested in contributing code to mod_rewrite
> adding variable expansion in the CondPattern.
> Though an experienced programmer, I am not
> familiar with the protocols used on a large open
> source project such as Apache httpd.
>
>Cou
Hi,
what can happen if I load a module compiled with EAPI flag into a Apache 1.3 without
EAPI??
I ask for ditribution of binaries and want to know if it makes no problems loading
EAPI-enabled modules; or if I should compile 2 binaries (I'm thinking of modules with
no EAPI stuff in it, just only
Hi,
I can see that mod_log_config, mod_rewrite and mod_file_cache have it in;
but where in the source tree is APR_INHERIT as set by apr_file_inherit_set() actually
handled?
A grep of the source tree does not find any application of this flag.
Is it really implemented yet, or just a dummy?
Guen
Thanks, that is the information that I was looking for. I just wanted
to raise the issue because I wasn't sure if there were any other uses
for mod_ldap besides auth_ldap. It appears that there is and that is
reason enough to leave it as is. Although I do agree that mod_ldap
should be renamed t
See srclib/apr/include/apr_inherit.h for the macro stubs that help
declare such accessors. See srclib/apr/include/arch/{plat}/apr_arch_inherit.h
for the macros that implement those accessors.
Bill
At 09:24 AM 1/22/2003, Günter Knauf wrote:
>Hi,
>I can see that mod_log_config, mod_rewrite and mo
--On Wednesday, January 22, 2003 8:54 AM +0200 Graham Leggett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mod_ldap is a connection pool and query cache, and can be reused by
other apache modules that require ldap, such as a potential
DAV-ldap module, or a proxy_ldap module, so no - I'd say a
combination would be
> In fact, I thought that was the original plan. I recall that some
> people weren't too comfortable with the pooling code in APR-util.
> But, I still think it makes sense... -- justin
One 'ultimate' way to proof how much sense it would make is by using it to
do simply/do some clever apache/tom
Done.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following modules need to be added to the bugzilla system:
>
> mod_ldap
> mod_auth_ldap
> mod_authn_ldap
> mod_authz_ldap
>
> Regards,
> Graham
> --
> -
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] "There'
--On Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:39 PM +0100 Dirk-Willem van Gulik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One 'ultimate' way to proof how much sense it would make is by
using it to do simply/do some clever apache/tomcat connection
pooling.
For that, you should use apr_reslist_t. IIRC, it was written for
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 08:57 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:39 PM +0100 Dirk-Willem van Gulik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One 'ultimate' way to proof how much sense it would make is by
using it to do simply/do some clever apache/tomcat connection
po
Thomas,
Currently the disk cache garbage collection is not implemented. This is
one of the reasons why this code is still in the experimental directory.
There is not a schedule for adding this code. If you would like to
contribute code to do this, please jump in.
That being said, it is one of the
the problem to solve is that run-time linking is not enabled
for DSOs built with apxs+gcc on AIX... somehow libtool does the
right thing with apxs+native-compiler, but a lot of folks are
trying to use gcc and don't know to add the right ld option to
the apxs invocation
adding apr ldflags to other
--On Wednesday, January 22, 2003 13:19:51 -0500 Jeff Trawick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the problem to solve is that run-time linking is not enabled
for DSOs built with apxs+gcc on AIX... somehow libtool does the
right thing with apxs+native-compiler, but a lot of folks are
trying to use gcc and
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Günter Knauf wrote:
> what can happen if I load a module compiled with EAPI flag into a Apache
> 1.3 without EAPI?? I ask for ditribution of binaries and want to know if
> it makes no problems loading EAPI-enabled modules; or if I should
Should work *I think*. I
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Graham Leggett wrote:
> > I am not sure whether "#-1" is being interpreted as 4294967295, or if
Sure. 4294967295 = (2^32 - 1). :-)
>> what can happen if I load a module compiled with EAPI flag into a Apache
>> 1.3 without EAPI?? I ask for ditribution of binaries and want to know if
>> it makes no problems loading EAPI-enabled modules; or if I should
>
>Should work *I think*. It wouldn't work the other way around, of course
>
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 02:28:11 +0100, André Malo wrote:
> * Joshua Slive wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Günter Knauf wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> have modified the 1.3 patch against mod_autoindex to provide configurable colored
>indexes for 2.0;
>>> is this of any interest?
>>
>> -0.
> hmm, I don't hav
Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
While testing mod_ldap, I noticed it was creating a shared memory file
like so:
[minfrin@jessica httpd-2.0]$ ls -al /tmp/mod_ldap_cache
-rw-r--r--1 nobody 42949672954 Jan 22 14:09
/tmp/mod_ldap_cache
The groupid is set to 4294967295 - which is bogus
FWIW, on AIX 4.3.3 I had to change it to "Group nobody"
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Ames [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: "Group" not working properly
>
>
> Graham Leggett wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Whi
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/10/31 05:57:52 $]
Release:
1.3.28-dev: In development
1.3.27: Tagged September 30, 2002. Announced Oct 3, 2002.
1.3.26: Tagged June 18, 2002.
1.3.25: Tagged June 17, 2002. Not re
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/01/21 20:55:55 $]
Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
2.1.0 : in development
Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related proj
29 matches
Mail list logo
