Hello *,
sorry for this question but I could not find any solution for my problem on
Internet (especially on google).
On the our project we are using till now apache-1.3.X version.
Unfortunatelly now we have to use the newest version of apache-2.2.X which is
included in SLES10 distribution
Den Wednesday 08 October 2008 13:43:18 skrev Oden Eriksson:
Den Tuesday 07 October 2008 20:37:48 skrev Jim Jagielski:
... at the usual location:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
The availability of these test tarballs does not constitute
an official release, however please
Den Tuesday 07 October 2008 20:37:48 skrev Jim Jagielski:
... at the usual location:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
The availability of these test tarballs does not constitute
an official release, however please download and test
as a VOTE will be called for in the next few days
On 10/7/08 8:49 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure sounds like this is a re-initialization of mysql, with apr and php
fighting for the honors.
I thought the official support of php was fastcgi only in httpd 2.2
--
Brian Akins
Chief Operations Engineer
Turner Digital
On 10/07/2008 08:37 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
... at the usual location:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
The availability of these test tarballs does not constitute
an official release, however please download and test
as a VOTE will be called for in the next few days regarding
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/07/2008 08:37 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
... at the usual location:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
The availability of these test tarballs does not constitute
an official release, however please download
Running fine for 1 day on gentoo.
Can't test on windows due to having no machine available.
~Jorge
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/07/2008 08:37 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Akins, Brian wrote:
On 10/7/08 8:49 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure sounds like this is a re-initialization of mysql, with apr and php
fighting for the honors.
I thought the official support of php was fastcgi only in httpd 2.2
Given the headaches he is
Den Wednesday 08 October 2008 19:50:06 skrev William A. Rowe, Jr.:
Akins, Brian wrote:
On 10/7/08 8:49 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure sounds like this is a re-initialization of mysql, with apr and php
fighting for the honors.
I thought the official support of php
Jim Jagielski wrote:
... at the usual location:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
[...]
+1
solaris 10 on sparc (64-bit, sun studio 12) all tests passed
-0.4
for not including a solution for the 6-years-old issue 10744
(https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10744)
-0.1
On Windows building fine and reports from the Apache Lounge community that
all works without issues.
Steffen
hi,
I'm writing a module that needs to modify the elements (workers) of
load balancers. That is, to move workers between different balancers.
for example, suppose we have two balancers b1 and b2. also, we have a
worker w to be moved from b1 to b2
basically, I do a push in b2-workers array:
On Sep 23, 2008, at 5:37 AM, David Shane Holden wrote:
Kaspar Brand wrote:
Making SNI support configurable at runtime also seems a more
attractive
solution to me - it would basically mean that in ssl_init_ctx(),
the SNI
callback is not registered unless it's explicitly configured. I
I don't think the approach you are suggesting will work.
I would suggest duplicating the workers at startup, enable/disable in
each balancer to 'move' them.
-Paul
Vinicius Petrucci wrote:
hi,
I'm writing a module that needs to modify the elements (workers) of
load balancers. That is, to
On 10/08/2008 09:54 PM, Vinicius Petrucci wrote:
hi,
I'm writing a module that needs to modify the elements (workers) of
load balancers. That is, to move workers between different balancers.
for example, suppose we have two balancers b1 and b2. also, we have a
worker w to be moved
On 10/8/08 2:15 PM, Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
vhosting does not work very well with apache, without band-aids like fastcgi
etc. that's a shame.
There is a rather lengthy list of reasons why mod_php doesn't work
correctly. AFAIK, the official word has been to use fast-cgi for
On 10/08/2008 09:56 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 23, 2008, at 5:37 AM, David Shane Holden wrote:
Kaspar Brand wrote:
Making SNI support configurable at runtime also seems a more attractive
solution to me - it would basically mean that in ssl_init_ctx(), the
SNI
callback is not
On 10/8/08 4:06 PM, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think the approach you are suggesting will work.
I would suggest duplicating the workers at startup, enable/disable in
each balancer to 'move' them.
+1.
Do graceful restarts work correctly with the stock load balancer?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Akins, Brian wrote:
There is a rather lengthy list of reasons why mod_php doesn't work
correctly. AFAIK, the official word has been to use fast-cgi for almost
3 years. Most other major http servers have taken the same stance. I
think we
Akins, Brian wrote:
On 10/8/08 2:15 PM, Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
vhosting does not work very well with apache, without band-aids like fastcgi
etc. that's a shame.
There is a rather lengthy list of reasons why mod_php doesn't work
correctly. AFAIK, the official word has been
This is getting of topic in dev, but...
On 10/8/08 4:17 PM, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've migrated all of my webservers to a mixture of Lighttpd and Nginx,
Why? The apache is bloated and slow argument is just plain incorrect.
(FWIW, I have nothing against eitehr of
Oden Eriksson wrote:
Den Wednesday 08 October 2008 19:50:06 skrev William A. Rowe, Jr.:
Akins, Brian wrote:
On 10/7/08 8:49 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure sounds like this is a re-initialization of mysql, with apr and php
fighting for the honors.
I thought the
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Oden Eriksson wrote:
Den Wednesday 08 October 2008 19:50:06 skrev William A. Rowe, Jr.:
Akins, Brian wrote:
On 10/7/08 8:49 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure sounds like this is a re-initialization of mysql, with apr and php
fighting for the
Hi,
I've used mod_jk (1/2) for years. I've always had an issue when a backend
server goes down, not tomcat/jboss stopped but dead. Recently some people I
work with have been using mod_proxy and mod_proxy_ajp. This seems to have the
same issue.
The code (proxy_util.c) assumes that
Paul Querna wrote:
I agree completely. Maybe we should finish our mod_proxy_fcgi module or
try to import mod_fcgid :-)
But, I don't have time to work on mod_proxy_fcgi.
So Can we ask the mod_fcgid project if we could import it?
Discuss :-)
Neither the Open Market License or GPL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Akins, Brian wrote:
Why? The apache is bloated and slow argument is just plain incorrect.
(FWIW, I have nothing against eitehr of those other than the FUD they spread
about apache.)
Why? Two reasons:
1) To test and get to know them. It was
On 10/8/08 4:06 PM, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think the approach you are suggesting will work.
I would suggest duplicating the workers at startup, enable/disable in
each balancer to 'move' them.
On 10/8/08 4:06 PM, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct. So you
I don't think the approach you are suggesting will work.
I would suggest duplicating the workers at startup, enable/disable in
each balancer to 'move' them.
Correct. So you cannot change the assignment of workers to a balancer during
runtime.
BTW: What is the goal that rises the need for
28 matches
Mail list logo
