I've committed a few new modules to trunk tonight:
mod_ratelimit: Bandwidth Rate Limiting for Clients.
mod_heartbeat: Generates Multicast heartbeat messages containing the
status of the server.
mod_heartmonitor: Collects these Multicast heartbeats for other modules
to use.
On 12/01/2008 12:42 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:22:39 -0500
Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In practice, the proposed fix looks good, and I want to
vote +1. I'm just a little concerned over whether
On 1 Dec 2008, at 08:52, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
2. IMHO ap_invoke_handler is only called in three locations:
It's a public API, so could be called by any module.
So ap_die maybe should do the following:
if (type == AP_FILTER_ERROR) {
if [ap_http_header_filter is still in chain]
On 1 Dec 2008, at 08:17, Paul Querna wrote:
I've committed a few new modules to trunk tonight:
Interesting.
Are we expecting docs anytime soon?
--
Nick Kew
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mod_heartmonitor: Collects these Multicast heartbeats for other modules to
use.
Interesting. Is there other modules that create separate thread(s) for
bypassing request-response thing?
--
С уважением, Кевац Марко
Sincerely
On 12/01/2008 10:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On 1 Dec 2008, at 08:52, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
2. IMHO ap_invoke_handler is only called in three locations:
It's a public API, so could be called by any module.
Correct.
So ap_die maybe should do the following:
if (type ==
On 1 Dec 2008, at 09:31, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
But do you see any objection to the (IMHO simpler) fix of
removing error buckets as we detect them?
Not directly. Could you please propose a concrete patch?
It makes discussion easier :-).
I think the one-liner should work, since we don't
Nick Kew wrote:
On 1 Dec 2008, at 08:17, Paul Querna wrote:
I've committed a few new modules to trunk tonight:
Interesting.
Are we expecting docs anytime soon?
patches welcome, the reademe files aer all I really had :-)
On 12/01/2008 11:01 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On 1 Dec 2008, at 09:31, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
But do you see any objection to the (IMHO simpler) fix of
removing error buckets as we detect them?
Not directly. Could you please propose a concrete patch?
It makes discussion easier :-).
I think
On 1 Dec 2008, at 10:19, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
if (eb) {
-ap_die(eb-status, r);
+int status;
+
+status = eb-status;
+apr_brigade_cleanup(b);
+ap_die(status, r);
return AP_FILTER_ERROR;
}
Good call. +1 to that.
--
Nick Kew
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1 Dec 2008, at 10:19, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
if (eb) {
-ap_die(eb-status, r);
+int status;
+
+status = eb-status;
+apr_brigade_cleanup(b);
+ap_die(status, r);
return
On 12/01/2008 03:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Sun Nov 30 18:55:14 2008
New Revision: 721952
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=721952view=rev
Log:
Add two new modules, originally written at Joost, to handle load balancing
across
multiple apache servers
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1 Dec 2008, at 10:19, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
if (eb) {
-ap_die(eb-status, r);
+int status;
+
+status = eb-status;
+
On 12/01/2008 06:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Sun Nov 30 21:12:22 2008
New Revision: 721965
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=721965view=rev
Log:
Add a new module, mod_ratelimit, originally written at Joost, which can rate
limit the outgoing bandwidth to a
Den Monday 01 December 2008 09:17:24 skrev Paul Querna:
I've committed a few new modules to trunk tonight:
mod_ratelimit: Bandwidth Rate Limiting for Clients.
mod_heartbeat: Generates Multicast heartbeat messages containing the
status of the server.
mod_heartmonitor: Collects these
Kevac Marko wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mod_heartmonitor: Collects these Multicast heartbeats for other modules to
use.
Interesting. Is there other modules that create separate thread(s) for
bypassing request-response thing?
Considered doing
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Kevac Marko wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mod_heartmonitor: Collects these Multicast heartbeats for other modules to
use.
Interesting. Is there other modules that create separate thread(s) for
bypassing
On 12/01/2008 08:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Sun Nov 30 23:25:11 2008
New Revision: 721987
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=721987view=rev
Log:
Add a new module to read in the heartbeat file and do load balancing for
mod_proxy based upon it.
Added:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
+for (i = 0; i balancer-workers-nelts; i++) {
+worker = APR_ARRAY_IDX(balancer-workers, i, proxy_worker);
+server = apr_hash_get(servers, worker-hostname, APR_HASH_KEY_STRING);
Hm, the hash uses IP addresses as keys whereas worker-hostname could be
IIRC, trunk contains (or contained) a security problem with regard to
backward compatibility with 2.x configs. I won't consider it releasable
until that has been fixed one way or another, and I can't tell from this
mail thread whether the actual fix was committed or not. I thought that
Chris
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
IIRC, trunk contains (or contained) a security problem with regard to
backward compatibility with 2.x configs. I won't consider it releasable
until that has been fixed one way or another, and I can't tell from this
mail thread whether the actual fix was committed or not.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Chris Darroch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally there was a certain amount of bike-shed re-painting in
the form of renaming configuration directives. I settled on
Match, MatchAll, etc. based on Eric Covener's comments.
I had meant iif containers are used, I'd
On Dec 1, 2008, at 3:16 PM, Chris Darroch wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
IIRC, trunk contains (or contained) a security problem with regard to
backward compatibility with 2.x configs. I won't consider it
releasable
until that has been fixed one way or another, and I can't tell
from this
Paul Querna wrote:
...
If the core fully supported UDP and multicast listeners, it should be
possible to write the heartmonitor module as just a protocol module,
although heartbeat would still likely need its current structure.
...
Issac Goldstand already developed UDP support, for the
24 matches
Mail list logo
