Re: svn commit: r1785116 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ modules/lua/config.m4

2017-03-07 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: > On 03/07/2017 07:49 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >> Ok, adding /usr/lib is a bad thing any and every day (and in this case, >> completely bogus since it lives in /usr/lib64). > > > Same on Ubuntu, where the actual

Re: Autobuild Progress

2017-03-07 Thread Eric Covener
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: > Getting 2.4.x going will require some backports, so I'm planning to look > into running the test suite against trunk (probably not next week but the > week after). Unless there's anyone who *really* wants 2.4.x

Re: Autobuild Progress

2017-03-07 Thread Jacob Champion
On 02/02/2017 12:22 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: Every commit you make to trunk (well, group of commits, within fifteen seconds of each other) is run through an incremental build, which takes about ten seconds. Every eight hours, the build tree is clobbered, resync'd, and built from scratch, which

Re: [RFC] ?

2017-03-07 Thread Jacob Champion
On 02/28/2017 04:32 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: I just don't like hamstringing a nice new directive with what's effectively a (rare) bug. (The conversation kinda died shortly after I said this. That was not my intent -- I like this directive a lot. Whether the consensus is to keep the corner

Re: svn commit: r1785116 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ modules/lua/config.m4

2017-03-07 Thread Jacob Champion
On 03/07/2017 07:49 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Ok, adding /usr/lib is a bad thing any and every day (and in this case, completely bogus since it lives in /usr/lib64). Same on Ubuntu, where the actual libraries live in an architecture-specific folder under /usr/lib. But I'm still not

Re: svn commit: r1785116 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ modules/lua/config.m4

2017-03-07 Thread Jacob Champion
On 03/07/2017 04:33 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Backport away! :) Done (and veto rescinded); thanks for bearing with me over the speed bump. :) --Jacob

Re: Problems using Apache::Test on Debian (and Ubuntu)

2017-03-07 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Tuesday, 7 March 2017 11:17:57 CET Eric Covener wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:32 AM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: >> > It seems we should have the framework process the bin/envvars (in the >> >

Re: Problems using Apache::Test on Debian (and Ubuntu)

2017-03-07 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Tuesday, 7 March 2017 12:56:04 CET William A Rowe Jr wrote: > My comment was that having an alternate target name, e.g. httpd.prefork > or httpd.worker ends up resulting in $prefix/conf/httpd.prefork.conf as the > derived config file name (although that file is actually httpd.conf). The > fact

Re: Problems using Apache::Test on Debian (and Ubuntu)

2017-03-07 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Tuesday, 7 March 2017 11:17:57 CET Eric Covener wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:32 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > It seems we should have the framework process the bin/envvars (in the > > normal path, or /etc/apache2 in this case)... but that should be based > > on

Re: Problems using Apache::Test on Debian (and Ubuntu)

2017-03-07 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:32 AM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: >> It seems we should have the framework process the bin/envvars (in the normal >> path, or /etc/apache2 in this case)... but that should

Re: Problems using Apache::Test on Debian (and Ubuntu)

2017-03-07 Thread Sam Tregar
If you're looking for a stop-gap for Ubuntu, apply my patch and tests start running. :) Or are you looking for a better stop-gap? I'm happy to make changes if you can explain what needs to work differently. Sam On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 7:32 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >

Status of 2.4.x-openssl-1.1.0-compat/ ?

2017-03-07 Thread William A Rowe Jr
Six months ago, rjung forked 2.4.x and began to backport our compatibility fixes for OpenSSL 1.1.0. Today, from the state of trunk, it seems the compatibility efforts look very good and are nearly ready to apply to 2.4.x. That branch-point was here;

Re: Problems using Apache::Test on Debian (and Ubuntu)

2017-03-07 Thread Eric Covener
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:32 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > It seems we should have the framework process the bin/envvars (in the normal > path, or /etc/apache2 in this case)... but that should be based on > retrieving the > pathname of bin/envvars from apxs, and apxs

Re: svn commit: r1785116 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ modules/lua/config.m4

2017-03-07 Thread William A Rowe Jr
Some oddities, pretty sure there is no regression though. Fedora's layout is; /usr/include/ luaconf.hlua.hlualib.hluaconf-x86_64.hlua.hpp /usr/include/lua-5.1/ lauxlib.h luaconf.h lua.h lua.hpp lualib.h /usr/lib64/ /usr/lib64/liblua-5.1.so /usr/lib64/libluajit-5.1.so.2 ->

Re: Problems using Apache::Test on Debian (and Ubuntu)

2017-03-07 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Sam Tregar wrote: > Are you suggesting that people who want to run tests that use Apache::Test > should know that they have to source /etc/apache2/envvars first? Or that I > should patch Apache::Test to source that file instead of guessing which

Re: svn commit: r1785116 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ modules/lua/config.m4

2017-03-07 Thread Jim Jagielski
Backport away! :) > On Mar 6, 2017, at 2:52 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: > > On 03/06/2017 09:41 AM, Jacob Champion wrote: >> On 03/06/2017 04:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> So config.m4 should look for that API then, right? >> >> Yup. I don't think it's *quite* as easy as