Bill,
In PR 50309, the submitted patch moved the apr_pool_cleanup_register() call
from procmgr_child_init to the tail end of procmgr_post_config in
fcgid_pm_win.c prior to returning APR_SUCCESS. You have simply removed it from
procmgr_child_init in r1234169.
On 1/20/2012 10:36 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/20/2012 7:07 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just a friendly reminder... If reports have been submitted
to BUGZ, could you list them in this thread please?
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52476
Suspects identified, proceeding
On 1/20/2012 10:40 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/20/2012 7:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I will note, for the record, that despite my request, it does
not look as if anyone has added the Windows issue(s) as either
showstoppers in STATUS or created a BUGZ issue to enable us
to track it.
On 1/20/2012 10:40 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/20/2012 7:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I will note, for the record, that despite my request, it does
not look as if anyone has added the Windows issue(s) as either
showstoppers in STATUS or created a BUGZ issue to enable us
to track it.
On 1/20/2012 11:30 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/20/2012 1:03 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 1/20/2012 10:40 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I hope to spend time this weekend on the win32 build. I would
like very much to dump .dsp/.dsw prior to your tag. That means
some sort of .mak
On 1/20/2012 12:14 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/20/2012 2:06 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Due to the fact that right now, you have to convert to VC9 first, then convert
to VC10, I
have some insight here that I am sure you do as well.
Good point...
If you have done this, you may remember
On 1/17/2012 11:25 AM, Steffen wrote:
It is line with our reports. Thanks, and this confirms again there is some
broken serious.
For me a showstopper 2.4, tons of win users going to deal with this.
Work around is to use 2.2.21 SSL-only and minimal config in front of 2.4.
Another possible
On 1/17/2012 11:56 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
I'd suggest that patches/apply_to_x.y.z/ is a clumsy notation. It seems
more efficient to set these up as patches/CVE--/ with individual
files for actively (or semi-actively) maintained versions. If there is
one patch which applies to 2.2.n
On 1/17/2012 12:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/17/2012 2:07 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
* Are we committed to providing the -deps for 2.4's lifetime, or would
we doc it with some weasel language?
I'm +1 for dropping -deps, but you knew that ;-)
* Does anyone care if we're not committed
On 1/13/2012 11:30 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/28/2011 6:57 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
Author: sf
Date: Wed Dec 28 14:54:49 2011
New Revision: 1225199
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1225199view=rev
Log:
Check during configtest that the directories for error logs exist
Testing
On 12/28/2011 6:57 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
Author: sf
Date: Wed Dec 28 14:54:49 2011
New Revision: 1225199
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1225199view=rev
Log:
Check during configtest that the directories for error logs exist
Testing under Windows is welcome
PR: 29941
I think
On 1/12/2012 10:11 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 12.01.2012 11:24, Steffen wrote:
We have at least 4 hard bugs in 2.3.16. Known for a long time, and
no need to exposure more for these.
Fine a GA, with a big note that it is not ready for Windows and
advising to run 2.2.21 as proven stable.
So
On 1/11/2012 5:52 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 1/11/2012 6:26 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
Also, in relation to the windows stuff, I think Jim's suggestion is
most appropriate in the absence of more windows users to test.
If all we need is testing and some logging, I'd be happy to assist. If
someone
On 1/12/2012 5:29 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 1/12/2012 5:50 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Either apachehaus.com or apachelounge.com have 2.3.16 binaries
available for Windows.
The problem is with the directive;
AcceptFilter httpd none
That is the only non-stardard config option.
Greg
0On 1/2/2012 3:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Sunday 01/01/2012 at 19:03, Mario Brandt wrote:
The loadbalancer still crashes on windows. See
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52402
We should try to get at least the rewrite/proxy issue resolved, first.
About the
Honesty,
never tries with these on ... especially sendfile ... slows us wintards
outbound down bigtime.
On 1/2/2012 3:08 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/1/2012 12:30 PM, Steffen wrote:
Also IMHO blocking GA:
- SSL on windows not usable
- Hanging logging workers
Does disabling the
Since I have been the most vocal about this
watchdog/hearmonitor/heartbeats on windows ... I should chime in.
I can tell someone what each do (as far as I have seen). There are,
minimal docvs on all but watchdog (which is required for a couple) ...
but ... look at my emails in the past ... am
My vote ... Stefan, wherever it fits (depends on whom I speak to) ,
these are showstoppers. But, it can be said these are one OS specific
... which usually does not stop the press AFAIK. I can say however .. as
a small time distributor ... this will be noted as the problems yet
remaining on
On 12/27/2011 10:40 AM, Steffen wrote:
Gregg reported it also:
I've also found AcceptFilter https none to be problematic. First time
you hit a site via https it usually comes up with a blank white
nothing. Hitting reload and it comes up proper.
That I did, fishing to see if others were
On 12/5/2011 12:25 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/05/2011 08:41 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/5/2011 1:22 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Like said on another thread, give me couple of days and I'll fix the
issue.
Well, as soon as I compile httpd-2.4 on windows which might be
tricky cause
build
On 12/5/2011 5:15 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Fixed in the trunk and 2.4.x
Willing to retest?
Regards
I see the change which was what I had suggested in the beginning,
granted I did not have a real good technical reason other than it then
works :) I have not built trunk recently but making the
On 12/4/2011 1:02 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Saturday 03 December 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/3/2011 1:32 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/2/2011 3:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
- the follwing modules added since 2.2 lack documentation
- mod_socache_dbm
- mod_socache_memcache
On 12/3/2011 2:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/3/2011 1:32 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/2/2011 3:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
- the follwing modules added since 2.2 lack documentation
- mod_socache_dbm
- mod_socache_memcache
- mod_socache_shmcb
These are required for SSL AFIAK
On 12/3/2011 7:54 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/3/2011 2:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/3/2011 1:32 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/2/2011 3:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
- the follwing modules added since 2.2 lack documentation
- mod_socache_dbm
- mod_socache_memcache
On 12/2/2011 3:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
- modules docs
- the follwing modules added since 2.2 lack documentation
- mod_watchdog
- mod_heartbeat
- mod_heartmonitor
- mod_lbmethod_heartbeat
I vote these off the Windows boat, mod_watchdog crashes the
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_scgi.c
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_scgi.c?rev=1203859r1=1203858r2=1203859view=diff
==
---
I did this a couple weeks ago, it's close, but not perfect. Best on
white/light background.
On 11/27/2011 8:18 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Nov 27, 2011, at 10:49, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 27.11.2011 10:50, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
docs/icons/apache_pb2* contain the
No, I looked it up after, it's one of the Swiss fonts from MS Office,
couldn't grab back the mail.
On 11/27/2011 4:48 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Gregg,
In 28.11.2011 01:12, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
I did this a couple weeks ago, it's close, but not perfect. Best on
white/light background
Stefan,
Which build problem? mod_lua?, I've never seen release blocked on a a
alpha/beta nor do I remember screaming and blocking a release by a
simple problem with a module, libhttpd is a whole different matter, as
that means nothing builds, therefore nothing works. mod_watchdog still
On 11/9/2011 6:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as 2.3.15-beta BETA and,
with luck, this will be our last beta and the next release in ~2weeks
or less will be 2.4.0 GA!!
Vote will last the normal 72 hours...
+1 for beta
Hi Stefan,
I am getting type errors on these in MSVC, can we please move the * after
PROXY_DECLARE_DATA?
Cheers,
Gregg
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c2011/10/14 19:48:03
1183474
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c2011/10/14 19:51:17
On 10/28/2011 8:00 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Steffeni...@apachelounge.com wrote:
Great,
time to make 2.3.15 available to test.
It would be most useful to be tested ahead of being part of an
attempted release.
For the pre-mentioned AcceptFilter+windows+vhost
.
Cheers,
Gregg
On 10/11/2011 3:53 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 7/7/2011 3:39 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
I have an error log full of these;
[Thu Jul 07 00:15:58.010625 2011] [mpm_winnt:warn] [pid 2840:tid 1572] (OS
64)The
specified network name is no longer available. : winnt_accept
Bill, is this on a Windows box?
I wouldn't say this is new, I had run into this back in May, I just
thought it was more my misconfiguration from lack of understanding than
anything.
One thing I have learned since then, is that slotmem_shm works properly
when running as a service, but not
It looks as if ap_max_mem_free was not originally intended to be exported. But
if it is going to be used in mod_ssl, it's is going to need to be no?
Linking...
Creating library .\Release/mod_ssl.lib and object .\Release/mod_ssl.exp
ssl_engine_init.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external
Bill,
I think it's been realized that the APR/IPv6 has no bearing on this but
I can confirm that
2.3.15-dev at r1177210 with apr 1.4.2 and ipv6 set to 0 does the exact
same thing.
Cheers,
Gregg
On 9/29/2011 11:58 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 7/7/2011 3:39 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
I
On 9/9/2011 9:10 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
which do not yet constitute ASF releases. win32-x86 binary distribution
will follow shortly.
This will be a 72 hour vote, which ends no later than Noon ET Monday
+/-1
[
On 9/5/2011 12:44 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sonntag, 4. September 2011 17:30
To: Apache HTTP Server Development List
Subject: next steps for range fix in 2.2.x
Can anyone fill in any details for the
+1 for beta
Windows x86 x64
XP, Vista x86 Server 2008 R2
No, but this is not a regression from any prior version (AcceptFilter
issue), I just tested on 2.3.5 and the issue is there. I don't see this
as holding up another Beta should folks want one. It surely needs to
addressed asap before GA.
Gregg
On 7/25/2011 8:03 AM, Steffen wrote:
Reported
Built this last night against APR/APU 1.4 HEAD, all went well. Thanks
Stefan for getting things moving again.
Cheers
Gregg
On 7/24/2011 12:51 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Please test the recent changes of the module selections, especially if
you use non-Linux Unix flavors and/or non-default
Hi,
I have an error log full of these;
[Thu Jul 07 00:15:58.010625 2011] [mpm_winnt:warn] [pid 2840:tid 1572]
(OS 64)The specified network name is no longer available. :
winnt_accept: Asynchronous AcceptEx failed.
Thanks to Steffen's bringing this up, I now know how I should be fixing
I was just pondering this mod_log_debug myself on the Windows side. There, we
have only what I would guess as the equivalents of Most and All. If I were the
one who could make the decision I'd want it in Most (BuildBin).
just my 2 pesos,
Gregg
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Ruggeri
Hi Stefan,
You're declaring this module as
extern module log_debug_module;
This is causing a failure to compile on Windows. Obviously every other single
compiler but MSVC doesn't care. However, every single other extern module (ssl,
proxy,dbd,dav, etc) is declared like so
extern module
Hi Bill, Steffen, et all,
It's Jeffs r1103595
Cheers,
Gregg
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:33:34 -0500
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd-2.3.13 as beta
On 6/30/2011 11:08 PM, Gregg L. Smith
Hi Jeff,
I can confirm this does fix the problem.
Thanks,
Gregg
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 14:54:10 -0400
Subject: Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd-2.3.13 as beta
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Gregg L
: Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:26:14 +0200
Subject: Re: Windows Laundry List pt3, mod_watchdog
On 07/01/2011 06:31 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hi folks,
Well, this is the same chunk of Win32 specific debugging code causing this
module to crash
Well? :-)
See original email for patch to Win build stuff. I nagged Nick to fix this
module to not crash on Windows, let's get it in the build, pretty please.
Cheers,
Gregg
-Original Message-
From: Gregg L. Smith g...@gknw.net
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 18:13:38
Hi Bill, Steffen, all,
My prior RE: to this has not shown up, so if it eventually does, sorry for the
double.
This seems to be specific to pre-Vista versions of Windoze. I am having no
problem in Vista x86 yet same build crashes (child only) on XP. I have not
tried 2008 R2 x64 yet.
I have
Hello again,
This one is quite simple in that there are simply no Unix file permissions in
Windows for sure, Netware and OS/2 assumed.
Attached patch keeps this module from failing to load due to unix permission
setting.
This is a interesting one, if one is using slotmem_shm there is no
Hi folks,
Well, this is the same chunk of Win32 specific debugging code causing this
module to crash yet again. I remember suggesting it be removed before, now I am
a little more adamant about it because it is really not needed, IMO of course.
If you really got to have it there, please a
Hi Bill, Steffen,
All I can add to this at the moment is this is happening in XP, I am running in
Vista x86 just fine. I have not built on 2008 R2 x64 yet but I will assume
(ouch) for now it will work fine there as well.
I'll try to see if I cannot track this down a little closer to the
,
On Monday 27 June 2011, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
looking at the submitted by in r1131465 this is a part of all the
code cleanup I have been seeing in bugzilla of late. It seems
however that inlining ap_rputs is causing problems on MSVC. I am
using VC9 and here is what I am seeing everywhere the header
Hello,
looking at the submitted by in r1131465 this is a part of all the code cleanup
I have been seeing in bugzilla of late. It seems however that inlining ap_rputs
is causing problems on MSVC. I am using VC9 and here is what I am seeing
everywhere the header is included.
Hi Bill,
makefile.win line 80
You're missing a closing quote.
Cheers,
Gregg
Hello again,
MSVC 2008
I've been trying to follow along this shift of ldap from APU to httpd to remove
it from APR2, so my question is;
Does http trunk now have ldap in it?
If it does, why am I running into this?
util_ldap.c line 41
#if !AP_HAS_LDAP
#error mod_ldap requires httpd to detect
I agree, we've been waiting this long, a little longer doesn't hurt;-) It is
in place for 2.2.19 and I've already built 2.3.12 with this and the new apr/apu
.. so all is good in the world.
Gregg
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
On the subject of your
Bill,
Yes there is a PR 47418 by Jorge for it. I've flagged as depending on 49997.
Gregg
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 14:19:37 -0500
Subject: Re: Windows Laundry List
About the patch, yes this should
/2.4?
IIRC it had to due with VC6 being used for 3rd party module
compatibility. With the release of 2.4 series around the corner maybe
now is a good time to discuss this again?
Kind regards
~Jorge
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Gregg L. Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
Hi folks
Ugh, me again, forgot to leave my say on this.
Call me whatever, I prefer the IDE for a few reasons;
It's simpler to rebuild one project if need be, faster too.
It helps delay the onset of Carpal Tunnel.
Maybe not great reasons, but frankly it's easier for noobs too. However you do
it, please
Hello folks,
I promised this long ago and I think I forgot to follow up. Here is the Windows
build stuff for this module.
Cheers,
Gregg
mod_authn_socache_winbuild.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi folks,
This was originally asked for by Jorge of blackdot.be back in July of 2006.
http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-devm=115394468128469w=2
With the simple fact that every Windows computer I have seen being sold for
some time now being x64, I do not see any reason to hold back on this since
Bill,
Please roll an r2 source. Since PHP is VC9, and more people will be going
outside the ASF for binaries, it would be nice for those distros as this
creates a lot of litter.
That or just announce in this thread the commit and I at least can patch on my
own.
Thanks,
Gregg
-Original
I have not received your reply on this address yet to quote but yes, that is
trivial,
Thank you,
Gregg
already replied to that, and I am curious ;) )
Regards,
Gabriel
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Gregg L. Smith li...@glewis.com wrote:
Hello Gabriel,
I've run into this on xp, vista 2008. Somehow source folders get put in
read only mode. Make them writable again and it will build. On Win7
Hello,
To add to this, I can confirm this breaks at least mod_macro, which I use and
am stuck either reconfiguring (which defeats the purpose of this highly useful
module) or am stuck at 2.3.12-dev pre this revision. Not that this adds any
weight to the discussion.
At least if this is
Nor would I expect you to. At minimum a hint in the consumers that
mod_slotmem_shm should be loaded. The current error message is not very clear
to a user IMO. mod_heartmonitor does this, explicitly says mod_watchdog is
needed should it not be loaded also.
There are other problems in at least
Hello,
It seems that slotmem_plain is not being found by the consumers which then
causes a configuration error. Attached patch fixes this and makes the error
message a little more friendlier for users by hinting to load slotmem which is
currently not documented as a requirement of these
Hello,
After r1070317 a block of code got moved below the block of Win32 debug code
that starts now at line 447. The code that was above it is now just directly
below but this has caused a crash on Windows for whatever reason (still unknown
to me).
The attached patch moves this block of
Thanks R??diger, Jim,
This fixes the crash on Window's I had reported couple week ago. Ping Nick.
Regards,
Gregg
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:51:14 -0500
Subject: Re: HEAD on trunk broken
On Mar 10, 2011, at
Hi Nick,
If I remove the test at 92-94 it moves along to the next step. On Windows we do
not have a default provider for the platform so the server stops there, logs
the configuration error but it doesn't crash. I should have mentioned that,
sorry I didn't.
LoadModule authn_socache_module
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:20:49 -0800
Gregg L. Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
Hi folks,
In the spirit of beta, could we get the last missing module that I know of,
mod_authn_socache, in the Windows build? Reading it's doc it sounds like a
good module to have if using dbd for authentication.
Should
Hi folks,
In the spirit of beta, could we get the last missing module that I know of,
mod_authn_socache, in the Windows build? Reading it's doc it sounds like a good
module to have if using dbd for authentication.
It currently crashes if loaded without any configuration in Windows, it may
Hello again,
This get's our httpd.conf file in Windows up to date with what is actually
being put on the file system with respect to modules. Applies with offset -1 if
applied before mod_authn_socache addition in my prior email.
Regards,
Gregg
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski
and what I meant.
On Feb 9, 2011, at 11:07 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hi Jim,
Thank you, yet I'm more concerned about the former one honestly as it's a
no-go.
I looked up the error and you can not declare a function internal to the dll
as a dll import. Because of PROXY_DECLARE the function
-0500
Subject: Re: mod_proxy_balancer build failure
On Feb 8, 2011, at 9:11 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Good evening,
-- Build started: Project: mod_proxy_balancer, Configuration: Release
Win32 --
Compiling...
mod_proxy_balancer.c
.\mod_proxy_balancer.c(1332) : error C2491
Good evening,
-- Build started: Project: mod_proxy_balancer, Configuration: Release Win32
--
Compiling...
mod_proxy_balancer.c
.\mod_proxy_balancer.c(1332) : error C2491: 'ap_proxy_update_members' :
definition of dllimport function not allowed
.\mod_proxy_balancer.c(1343) : warning
Confirming all is fine is Windoze land as well. I'll post my project files and
patch to the rest of the system soon for inclusion.
Thanks,
Gregg
G/M Jim and Stefan,
Can confirm recent updates cure the build problems noted (for NetWare folks
at least - I'll let the Windows people speak for
Hi,
I'm seeing similar in Win as well looking at line numbers
-- Build started: Project: mod_proxy_balancer, Configuration: Release Win32
--
Compiling...
mod_proxy_balancer.c
.\mod_proxy_balancer.c(739) : warning C4090: 'function' : different 'const'
qualifiers
-- Rebuild All
Sorry if this breaks thread, had to subscribe a new address
That is an extremely ugly solution: stdlib.h uses #ifndef _STDLIB_H
internally, so this may negatively affect other plattforms or other
source files which include util_expr_private.h.
From reading util_expr_parse.c, I think something
Hello,
minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:23:43 2011
New Revision: 1055250
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c?rev=1055250r1=1055249r2=1055250view=diff
If the vote were to be held today I would +1 it.
Built on VC6 XP VC9 Vista in x86 and VC9 on 2008 R2 in x64
Tested in various degrees with all the above and one live on x86 XP for
over 24 hours now.
Cheers,
Gregg
Mario Brandt wrote:
+1 on Win7
(latest unix tarballs of APR, APR-Util and
Hi,
Seems to me what users have the most problem groking is the duplicate of
the main host in httpd.conf and it needing to be the first vhost. In the
docs it is highlighted as Main server goes away. In reality, this is
not always the case, sometimes people just get the main host and nothing
I'd say I am. Even though it is not a high traffic server, the last time I got
one of those errors was October 8th. looking further back, it is always
following one specific custom error doc that oops, didn't exist till now cause
I forgot to generate a new on when I changed the look of the
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone opposed if I declare 2.3.9 DOA and TR 2.3.10?
No objections from the noisy guy in the peanut gallery.
Gregg
!
Gregg
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/29/2010 1:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/22/2010 4:59 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hello,
Post r1032073, trunk has not built in Windows as suggested in the log for
r1032073.
I see util_expr.c needs to go and util_expr_*.c/h need to be added
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 25 November 2010, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Much better, results seem to be the same as Guenter's;
\server\util_expr_eval.c(350) : error C2440: ':' : cannot convert
from 'int (__stdcall *)(ap_expr_lookup_parms *)' to
'ap_expr_lookup_fn (__cdecl *)'
\server
'ap_expr_lookup_fn (__stdcall *)' to 'ap_expr_lookup_fn (__cdecl *)'
Regards,
Gregg
Original Message ---
Stefan,
Am 25.11.2010 08:14, schrieb Stefan Fritsch:
On Tuesday 23 November 2010, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Here we go, cannot test beyond libhttp
warning aren't a big deal
Original Message ---
Pre-test tarballs of httpd-2.3.9-alpha are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/httpd-2.3.9-alpha/
Please try 'em out and I'll make them official test tarballs...
-1, does not build on Windows.
Libhttpd - Cannot find util_expr.c
No
Original Message ---
Pre-test tarballs of httpd-2.3.9-alpha are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/httpd-2.3.9-alpha/
Please try 'em out and I'll make them official test tarballs...
-1, does not build on Windows.
Libhttpd - Cannot find util_expr.c
No
, where would you suggest putting a
#ifdef WIN32
#define YY_NO_UNISTD_H
#endif
util_expr_private.h?
Thanks,
Gregg
Hoping this webmail doesn't send twice again.
Original Message ---
On Tuesday 23 November 2010, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Original Message
---
On Tuesday 23 November 2010, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
In util_expr_scan.c line 612 there is an #ifndef YY_NO_UNISTD_H
around a include to unistd.h, where would you suggest putting a
#ifdef WIN32
#define YY_NO_UNISTD_H
#endif
util_expr_private.h?
Yes, exactly. Maybe it should
Hello,
Post r1032073, trunk has not built in Windows as suggested in the log
for r1032073.
I see util_expr.c needs to go and util_expr_*.c/h need to be added to
the build. What baffles me is the .y .l files. AFIAK, I have never
built the lexical target that kicks in the custom build step
Hello Gabriel,
I've run into this on xp, vista 2008. Somehow source folders get put in read
only mode. Make them writable again and it will build. On Win7 if that means
putting it in Documents, so be it.
As far as errors in IDE, you sure they are not warnings? 2 warnings per project
is what
Jeff,
In the next day or two while doing this, could please have a look at PR 48949.
TIA,
Gregg
Original Message ---
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Gabriel Petrovay
gabipetro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Maybe this gives you some hints. I have looked a little in the code
Hi Stefan,
Not in my book it shouldn't go away. It is the only place I can get good
debug info on perl scripts ... OK, not the only place but it is easiest
place to find the needed info. Since perl is not 100% dead and gone,
please keep it. It seems fine as-is, as I've been using it 10 years
A loud resounding Amen to Guenter from the Windows balcony.
I have reservations however.
1. I have a patch that let's me build trunk with the PCRE 5.0 from 2.2,
but I do not want to stay at PCRE 5.0 cause you have to have something
newer to link mod_security 2.5.12+ against, so I have to build
Hello Rainer,
I am +1 for this, as a matter of fact I lobbied for this 10 months ago.
http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-devm=125421199606305w=2
If it is going to be done however, please do it completely. Attached is
the rest of what is needed. [mod_proxy_scgi_project.patch]
mod_proxy_scgi.dsp
I see this statement I made to be incorrect now since you added this today.
Regards,
Gregg
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
installwinconf.awk which was overlooked when adding this module to trunk.
Peanut Gallery vote:
[+1] Release httpd-2.2.16
XP SP3, VC6 SDK 2003 R2 ... ~24 hours live w/ no problems seen
XP SP3/Vista SP1, VC9 ... no problems noticed w/ light testing
Server 2008 R2 (x64), SDK 7 ... no problems noticed w/ light testing
Cheers Beers
Gregg
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
