On Jan 9, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just a FYI: Since I have some plans for this evening, the
TR of the Holy Trinity :) will occur tomorrow am.
Will give it a few more hours and then will TR around 11/12 eastern
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:06:49 -0500
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just a FYI: Since I have some plans for this evening, the
TR of the Holy Trinity :) will occur tomorrow am.
Will give it a few more hours and then will TR
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2008 01:27
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:29:43 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:15:57 +0100
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At lines 364 and 460 (trunk), you set HTTP_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE
when broken chunking is encountered. I don't think that's right:
That's because this was the error code that was used there before for
empty
On Jan 9, 2008, at 9:42 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
Not so sure here - we're not really returning an error status in
any case, and sending errors to the backend falls outside the scope
of HTTP.
I've just voted +1 on keeping that as-is, in the hope of getting
backported in time for Jim's 2.2.8
On Jan 9, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008, at 9:42 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
Not so sure here - we're not really returning an error status in
any case, and sending errors to the backend falls outside the scope
of HTTP.
I've just voted +1 on keeping that as-is, in the hope of
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2008 16:17
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available
On Jan 9, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote
Just a FYI: Since I have some plans for this evening, the
TR of the Holy Trinity :) will occur tomorrow am.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
START httpd goes into it's goofy mode because it has no interactive
behavior, but has no cmd to exit to, and cmd sees it's process is still
running. start -k httpd should not exhibit this behavior. If there was
a start -hide -k httpd, it wouldn't be offensive.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm thinking of a scenario where the console *parent only* and on win32
might hold onto the stdin handle. I'll research and reply.
I'm becoming more certain that without stdout (we *do* launch with stdin
to the console, because it's only deprived from the child) we
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:00:46PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged.
2.2.7 tested and working on BS2000 and FreeBSD-4.x.
Martin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Fujitsu Siemens
On 01/07/2008 06:38 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 2:34 AM, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've added a test case to t/modules/proxy.t in perl-framework which
exercises the non-blockingness of the chunked encoding parser a little
by dripfeeding a chunked response at it, byte
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:29:43 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick could you please test latest trunk (already contains
optimizations) and 2.2.x with r609394 and (minimum stuff to
fix all aspects of the bug including chunk extensions) backported
which should apply cleanly, again?
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:29:43 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once the tests are positive I will propose r609394 and r609538 for
backport such that TR of 2.2.x and all other branches can start soon.
It works, but a couple of niggles reviewing those. Taking line
numbers on a diff
On 01/08/2008 03:30 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:29:43 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once the tests are positive I will propose r609394 and r609538 for
backport such that TR of 2.2.x and all other branches can start soon.
It works, but a couple of niggles
Okay, I found a new bug in the 2.2.7 proxy while testing SSL
and non-SSL CONNECTions both with and without a ProxyRemote
directive.
verbose
To recap, totally different things happen in the presence or
absence of a ProxyRemote:
* with ProxyRemote, the web server acts as a forwarder, and
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Tom Donovan wrote:
Steffen wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Tom Donovan's confirmed the state of mpm_winnt as again working
with mod perl across service, console, and -X modes (and some
other slightly more obscure models).
I'll backport the correction to 2.0.63
Tom Donovan wrote:
With an earlier patch from comment #6 in bug 43534, mod_perl and the
Apache window seem fine in all startup cases I can think to try - but
there is a concern about exactly when stdout gets directed to the null
device.
I don't quite follow this concern - but I'm sure
On 01/08/2008 06:41 PM, Martin Kraemer wrote:
Okay, I found a new bug in the 2.2.7 proxy while testing SSL
and non-SSL CONNECTions both with and without a ProxyRemote
directive.
verbose
To recap, totally different things happen in the presence or
absence of a ProxyRemote:
*
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:37:10PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Very, very strange because in the SSL proxy forward case you
1. use mod_proxy_connect which wasn't touched in 2.2.x for the last 11 month,
so I doubt that this is a regression-
I must confess that I have always tested the
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:29:43 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will also propose the optimizations. If someone has cycles to
review then fine, if not then in 2.2.9 :-).
At lines 364 and 460 (trunk), you set HTTP_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE
when broken chunking is encountered. I don't
On 01/06/2008 07:47 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/06/2008 11:39 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/06/2008 02:20 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:28:33 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/05/2008 07:04 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:38:58 +0100
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:29:43AM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Ok, hopefully final one. Though I still have some optimizations in the
pipe they do not relate directly to the bug.
Nick could you please test latest trunk (already contains optimizations) and
2.2.x with r609394 and r609538
From what I can tell, all 3 versions should be not-released
and we should instead move ahead with 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
to address the current concerns...
1.3.41 looks releasable with the current state of HEAD.
2.0.63 requires one more vote for the ssl lib stuff
2.2.8 requires more
On Jan 7, 2008 3:03 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I can tell, all 3 versions should be not-released
and we should instead move ahead with 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
to address the current concerns...
1.3.41 looks releasable with the current state of HEAD.
2.0.63
On Jan 7, 2008, at 9:12 AM, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 3:03 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I can tell, all 3 versions should be not-released
and we should instead move ahead with 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
to address the current concerns...
1.3.41 looks
On 01/07/2008 03:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
From what I can tell, all 3 versions should be not-released
and we should instead move ahead with 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
to address the current concerns...
1.3.41 looks releasable with the current state of HEAD.
2.0.63 requires one more vote
On 01/07/2008 03:55 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/07/2008 03:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
From what I can tell, all 3 versions should be not-released
and we should instead move ahead with 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
to address the current concerns...
1.3.41 looks releasable with the
On Jan 6, 2008 11:41 PM, Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I actually built my own perl 5.10.0, put its bin in front of my PATH
and installed all the requisite modules. I did this mainly because I
don't want to mess with the system installation, but prefer to hose
one I can easily replace.
On Jan 7, 2008 2:34 AM, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've added a test case to t/modules/proxy.t in perl-framework which
exercises the non-blockingness of the chunked encoding parser a little
by dripfeeding a chunked response at it, byte by byte, it passes with
the trunk and fails with
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
From what I can tell, all 3 versions should be not-released
and we should instead move ahead with 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
to address the current concerns...
1.3.41 looks releasable with the current state of HEAD.
2.0.63 requires one more vote
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 07 January, 2008 19:52
Subject: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7
available
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
From what I can tell
Steffen wrote:
- Original Message - From: William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 07 January, 2008 19:52
Subject: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7
available
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Tom Donovan's confirmed
- Original Message -
From: Tom Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 07 January, 2008 20:38
Subject: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7
available
Steffen wrote:
- Original Message - From: William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL
Tom Donovan wrote:
Steffen wrote:
- Original Message - From: William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 07 January, 2008 19:52
Subject: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7
available
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Tom
Steffen wrote:
Also with this patch it is not outputting to the Dos-box.
Tom, it does not happens with your patch which included in 2.2.7
download at the Apache Lounge. Only the latest patch from Bill has the
issue.
Of course not, Tom's proposed patch and the final patch adopted both
On 01/06/2008 02:20 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:28:33 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/05/2008 07:04 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:38:58 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. Can you setup a tcpdump between proxy and server and
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Steffen wrote:
mod_perl on Windows 2.2.7
Using http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/ with ActivePerl 5.8.8.822
FAILS
I'd be happy to see a fix; yes I consider 'as a console' to be a test
environment, but I also consider it to be very useful and worth fixing.
Even
Tom Donovan wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Steffen wrote:
mod_perl on Windows 2.2.7
Using http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/ with ActivePerl 5.8.8.822
FAILS
I posted an updated patch to bug 43534 for 2.2.7 rc.
Thanks Tom, saw it, reviewing it now.
Currently the parent creates a
On 01/06/2008 03:20 AM, Takashi Sato wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:00:46 -0500
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache HTTP Server fans,
The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged.
These are not updated in 2.2:
On Jan 4, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged.
While it seems to me that we're looking at a re-roll with several
patches, please find my test results from the past couple of days.
On 01/06/2008 11:39 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/06/2008 02:20 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:28:33 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/05/2008 07:04 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:38:58 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. Can
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Tom Donovan wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Steffen wrote:
mod_perl on Windows 2.2.7
Using http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/ with ActivePerl 5.8.8.822
FAILS
I posted an updated patch to bug 43534 for 2.2.7 rc.
Thanks Tom, saw it, reviewing it now.
On 01/06/2008 07:13 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged.
While it seems to me that we're looking at a re-roll with several
patches, please
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 00:07:42 +
Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A quick heads-up:
Regression: fails to proxy massively chunked responses.
r609394 fixes this, but introduces (or unmasks) new issues
with chunked data edge-cases. Specifically, two testcases
in which the termination of the
On Jan 6, 2008 10:13 AM, Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) on PowerPC:
[-1] 1.3.40 (CVE-2007-6388 not fixed)
[+1] 2.0.62 (with SSL toolkit detection patch, and sendfile disabled)
[+1] 2.2.7
Darwin Graymalkin.local 9.1.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.1.0: Wed Oct 31
On Jan 6, 2008, at 11:18 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Interesting in that this differs from my tests on 10.5.1/Intel (see my
earlier post). What perl / LWP were you using?
I actually built my own perl 5.10.0, put its bin in front of my PATH
and installed all the requisite modules. I did
On 01/05/2008 02:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 00:07:42 +
Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regression: fails to proxy massively chunked responses.
OK, it works correctly if I revert r602679 (no other changes).
Investigating further.
It would be helpful if you could
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:37:53 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/05/2008 02:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 00:07:42 +
Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regression: fails to proxy massively chunked responses.
OK, it works correctly if I revert
, 2008 21:00
Subject: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7
available
Apache HTTP Server fans,
The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged. The test tarballs are available
for testing and feedback at the below
On 01/05/2008 11:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:37:53 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/05/2008 02:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 00:07:42 +
Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regression: fails to proxy massively chunked responses.
OK, it
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 11:47:40 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you please try if the following patch against the vanilla tar ball
fixes the problem?
Nope. Causes both test cases to give just one byte of response.
--
Nick Kew
Application Development with Apache - the Apache
On 01/05/2008 11:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 11:47:40 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you please try if the following patch against the vanilla tar ball
fixes the problem?
Nope. Causes both test cases to give just one byte of response.
Sorry my first
On 01/05/2008 11:36 AM, Steffen wrote:
Building fine with GUI on VS 2005 out of the box.
With the shipped httpd.conf It works!
It crashes when apr_bucket_alloc() is called by modules
and also when eg. EnableMMAP off is set:
\srclib\apr-util\buckets\apr_buckets_alloc.c
+ list
On Jan 5, 2008 11:36 AM, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It crashes when apr_bucket_alloc() is called by modules
and also when eg. EnableMMAP off is set:
\srclib\apr-util\buckets\apr_buckets_alloc.c
+ list 0x00b71f10 {pool=0x00b6ff08 allocator=0x freelist=0x
...}
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:11:07 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you please try if the following patch against the vanilla tar
ball fixes the problem?
Nope. Causes both test cases to give just one byte of response.
Sorry my first patch was bogus of course :-(. Please
On 01/05/2008 12:27 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:11:07 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you please try if the following patch against the vanilla tar
ball fixes the problem?
Nope. Causes both test cases to give just one byte of response.
Sorry my first
Looks like that it happens only when add Win32DisableAcceptEx to the conf.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, 05 January, 2008 12:12
Subject: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7
-
From: Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, 05 January, 2008 12:12
Subject: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7
available
On 01/05/2008 11:36 AM, Steffen wrote:
Building fine with GUI on VS 2005 out of the box
]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, 05 January, 2008 12:12
Subject: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7
available
On 01/05/2008 11:36 AM, Steffen wrote:
Building fine with GUI on VS 2005 out of the box.
With the shipped httpd.conf It works
On 01/05/2008 11:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:37:53 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/05/2008 02:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 00:07:42 +
Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regression: fails to proxy massively chunked responses.
OK, it
Agreed... trying to recreate here...
On Jan 5, 2008, at 8:21 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/05/2008 11:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:37:53 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/05/2008 02:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 00:07:42 +
Nick Kew
On Jan 4, 2008, at 7:07 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:00:46 -0500
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache HTTP Server fans,
The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged.
Regression: fails to proxy massively
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 10:06:04 -0500
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regression: fails to proxy massively chunked responses.
Just to be clear, is this a regression from 2.2.6 or
from just 2.2.6+ ?
Both. And almost certainly from earlier versions.
p.s. I'm just back at my desk; will
Steffen wrote:
Looks like that it happens only when add Win32DisableAcceptEx to the conf.
Steffen
On 01/05/2008 11:36 AM, Steffen wrote:
It crashes when apr_bucket_alloc() is called by modules
...
\srclib\apr-util\buckets\apr_buckets_alloc.c
+ list 0x00b71f10 {pool=0x00b6ff08
On 01/05/2008 05:00 PM, Tom Donovan wrote:
Steffen wrote:
Looks like that it happens only when add Win32DisableAcceptEx to the
conf.
Steffen
On 01/05/2008 11:36 AM, Steffen wrote:
It crashes when apr_bucket_alloc() is called by modules
...
\srclib\apr-util\buckets\apr_buckets_alloc.c
prefer not to make again a patch for the
Apachelounge community.
Btw. mod_fcgid looks now ok.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 04 January, 2008 21:00
Subject: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd
-
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 04 January, 2008 21:00
Subject: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7
available
Apache HTTP Server fans,
The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server
On 01/05/2008 03:54 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
2. Excerpt from first test results:
1\r\n
\r\r\n
e\r\n
1\r\n
z\r\n
1\r\n
m\r\n
1\r\r\n
0\r\n
\r\n
This an invalid chunked encoding (\r is already the one byte that was
announced for this
I just recompiled with that patch. The crashes with are now indeed gone!
So all is good it seems :)
On Jan 5, 2008 5:09 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although I have limited knowledge in the Windows MPM the patch looks
reasonable.
I assume you have already tested that the crash
Yes, the crash dissappears.
I built with MS Visual Studio 8 on win2k and tested on win2k, winxp, and vista.
Also tried it with:
ab -n 10 -c 100 http://localhost/large_file.html
Where large_file.html is 200kb. No continued memory growth observed (after the first few seconds),
so I
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:38:58 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. Can you setup a tcpdump between proxy and server and between
client and proxy? I guess the network traces would be very helpful in
finding out where things are starting to get wrong.
One testcase with its tcpdump
Tom Donovan wrote:
Yes, the crash dissappears.
I built with MS Visual Studio 8 on win2k and tested on win2k, winxp, and
vista.
ab -n 10 -c 100 http://localhost/large_file.html
Where large_file.html is 200kb. No continued memory growth observed
(after the first few seconds), so I
Steffen wrote:
Building fine with GUI on VS 2005 out of the box.
It crashes when apr_bucket_alloc() is called by modules
and also when eg. EnableMMAP off is set:
This was actually the win9x transaction pump, which is actually used
by Win32DisableAcceptEx. EnableMMAP was something of a red
On Jan 5, 2008 7:45 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Donovan wrote:
Yes, the crash dissappears.
I built with MS Visual Studio 8 on win2k and tested on win2k, winxp, and
vista.
ab -n 10 -c 100 http://localhost/large_file.html
Where large_file.html is
mod_perl on Windows 2.2.7
Using http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/ with ActivePerl 5.8.8.822 FAILS
Rebuilding mod_perl with latest SVN snapshot 2.0.4-dev against 2.2.7
and use *only* the new generated mod_perl.so, it is working except from
command line.
Since this problem (bug 43534) is
On 01/05/2008 07:04 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:38:58 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. Can you setup a tcpdump between proxy and server and between
client and proxy? I guess the network traces would be very helpful in
finding out where things are starting
Den Friday 04 January 2008 21.00.46 skrev Jim Jagielski:
Apache HTTP Server fans,
The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged. The test tarballs are available
for testing and feedback at the below location. Everyone is reminded
that
Steffen wrote:
mod_perl on Windows 2.2.7
Using http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/ with ActivePerl 5.8.8.822 FAILS
Rebuilding mod_perl with latest SVN snapshot 2.0.4-dev against 2.2.7
and use *only* the new generated mod_perl.so, it is working except from
command line.
Since this problem
On 01/05/2008 12:27 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:11:07 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you please try if the following patch against the vanilla tar
ball fixes the problem?
Nope. Causes both test cases to give just one byte of response.
Sorry my first
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:28:33 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/05/2008 07:04 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:38:58 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. Can you setup a tcpdump between proxy and server and between
client and proxy? I guess
On sön, 2008-01-06 at 01:20 +, Nick Kew wrote:
Do you mean as in tcpdump -x? I've uploaded a pair of dumps
(one of client-proxy, the other of proxy-server) at the same
location.
tcpdump -p -i any -s 1600 -w traffic.pcap port 80
Regards
Henrik
On Jan 5, 2008, at 5:20 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
Do you mean as in tcpdump -x? I've uploaded a pair of dumps
(one of client-proxy, the other of proxy-server) at the same
location.
The best way to get a tcpdump file for analysing in Wireshark, do:
tcpdump -i lo0 (or whatever) -s 0 -w
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 00:07:42 +
Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged.
Regression: fails to proxy massively chunked responses.
Since wrowe asked me in IRC, I tested 2.0.62.
It doesn't
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:00:46 -0500
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache HTTP Server fans,
The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged.
These are not updated in 2.2:
manual/mod/quickreference.html.ko.euc-kr
Takashi Sato wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:00:46 -0500
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache HTTP Server fans,
The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged.
./build.sh is not enough.
./build.sh all is needed for 2.0, and
On Jan 4, 2008 12:00 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+1 for 2.2.7.
Tested on Mac OS 10.5.1 (aka 9.1.0) with APR/APR-util 1.2.12.
Some caveats though on Mac OS - I have a hunch they are more about the
test suite than anything else.
Configure
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
I'm getting a whole lot of errors with vs 2008 and 2005 on windows:
Apr seems to be to blame:
---
Error 1 error C2079: 'mip' uses undefined struct
'group_source_req'
s:\source\x86\httpd-2.2\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\multicast.c 140 apr
Next time, try
I'm getting a whole lot of errors with vs 2008 and 2005 on windows:
Apr seems to be to blame:
---
Error 1 error C2079: 'mip' uses undefined struct
'group_source_req'
s:\source\x86\httpd-2.2\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\multicast.c 140 apr
Error 2 error C2224: left of
On 1/4/2008 at 1:00 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jim Jagielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache HTTP Server fans,
The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged. The test tarballs are available
for testing and feedback at the
Phew whit some help I got it all sorted out.
Everything seems to be running and functioning at first sight.
Atleast my config because I couln't get the test framework to run.
Although compiling from a converted source was a pain +1 on this if
the final win32-src.zip compiles file after
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:00:46 -0500
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache HTTP Server fans,
The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged.
Regression: fails to proxy massively chunked responses.
I've just run it on a matrix of
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 00:07:42 +
Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regression: fails to proxy massively chunked responses.
OK, it works correctly if I revert r602679 (no other changes).
Investigating further.
--
Nick Kew
Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:00:46PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Apache HTTP Server fans,
The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged. The test tarballs are available
for testing and feedback at the below location. Everyone is
The Doctor wrote:
libsslc ??? What the heck?
libsslc.a is a proprietary code which very few OSes uses.
Yup - and those that do, httpd will pick up --with-sslc. Your
config.log might be revealing.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
libsslc ??? What the heck?
libsslc.a is a proprietary code which very few OSes uses.
Yup - and those that do, httpd will pick up --with-sslc. Your
config.log might be revealing.
Don't bother with your config.log;
$ap_ssltk_type of openssl
96 matches
Mail list logo
