Romain Manni-Bucau created IGNITE-12228:
---
Summary: Implement an Apache Beam runner on top of Ignite compute
grid?
Key: IGNITE-12228
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12228
integration in your
>> repo.
>>
>> —
>> Denis
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2017, at 9:54 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> This sounds awesome to have an Ignite runner which could compete with
>> hazelcast-jet.
>>
Hi
This sounds awesome to have an Ignite runner which could compete with
hazelcast-jet.
The entry point would be https://beam.apache.org/contribute/runner-guide/
IMHO.
Being on Ignite cluster also opens a lot of doors - reusing the filesystem
or distributed structures. Very exiting.
Le 8 déc. 2
Just checked and our spec jar passes sigtest. Not sure for this week
but think we can run a vote next one if nobody objects - don't
hesitate to ping if nothing happens ;).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber
2016-03-30 9:20 GMT+02:00 Dmitriy Setr
ated into our build routine and verify it using our CI
tests. In addition, it was verified by one of the JCache spec leads, Greg
Luck, who confirmed that Ignite complies with the spec.
>
> Given the above, can Geronimo provide us with JCache 1.0 spec JAR?
>
> D.
>
> On Tue, Mar 2
don't have.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber
2016-03-29 21:33 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament :
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:04 PM Dmitriy Setrakyan
> wrote:
>>
>> We will switch the Ignite JAR to the 1.0-alpha-1 version from Geronimo,
&
what you mean by not having access to TCK. Are
you talking about validating compatibility with JCAche using the TCK [1]?
In this case, Apache Ignite does pass the TCK. Moreover, the TCK seems to
be licensed under Apache 2.0 [2]. Can you please explain?
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.
>
> The only issue I see is the version. JSR107 spec is on version 1.0.0 [1],
> while the Geronimo JCache jar is on version 1.0-alpha-1.
>
> Any chance you can upgrade the version?
>
> [1] https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/tree/v1.0.0
>
> D.
>
> On Sat, Mar 26
Hi Dmitriy,
why not reusing geronimo jar? Generally @apache spec are owned by
geronimo and reused as much as possible using geronimo as umbrella
spec project. What's the issue you hit?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber
2016-03-26 21:20 GMT+01:00 Dm
