gt; Guava. That's why I propose to add Guava explicitly to
> at least
> >> >> > > have a
> >> >> > > > > > > > deterministic runtime configuration (see this link
> >> >> > > > > > > > <
&g
gt; > > > > least
>> >> > > have a
>> >> > > > > > > > deterministic runtime configuration (see this link
>> >> > > > > > > > <
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > &g
; > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 12:25 PM Zhenya Stanilovsky
> >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > &
>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > for an explanation).
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 12:25 PM Zhenya Stanilovsky
> >> > > > > > >
dow plugin are cover all Andrey
>> > Mashenkov
>> > > > > > listing
>> > > > > > > >> problems.
>> > > > > > > >> But there is no restrictions from running ignite server nodes
>> > > from
>> &g
> > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Alexander, first of all looks like Ivan Daschinsky approach
>> > > about thin
>> > > > > > > >> client use only and shadow plugin are cover all Andrey
>> > Mashenkov
>> > > > > > listing
>> > > &
no restrictions from running ignite server
> nodes
> > > from
> > > > > > some
> > > > > > > >> other code with it`s own guava version seems we obtain fast
> > > path to
> > > > > > jar
> > > > > > > >> hell he
gt; > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >1. Remove some copy-pasted code (like the "bytecode" module
> or
> > some
> > > > > > >> utility
> > > > > > >> >methods). Please see my original message
gt; > >> >1. Remove some copy-pasted code (like the "bytecode" module or
> some
> > > > > >> utility
> > > > > >> >methods). Please see my original message for the links to the
> code.
> > > > > >> >
>> >
> > > > >> >About allowing to use Guava in the codebase, my thoughts are the
> > > > >> following:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >1. We *already* use some code from Guava either directly (like in
>
2. I understand that some Guava methods are obsolete as of Java 11,
> > but
> > > >> >some of them still don't have any standard library counterparts, in
> > > which
> > > >> >case I think using Guava is justified (which is supported by
o a utility class.
> > >> >2. I understand that some Guava methods are obsolete as of Java 11,
> but
> > >> >some of them still don't have any standard library counterparts, in
> > which
> > >> >case I think using Guava is justified (which is suppo
pprove of my proposal?
> >> >
> >> >On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 7:56 PM Zhenya Stanilovsky
> >> >< arzamas...@mail.ru.invalid > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> alexpolovtcev please clarify what do you mean under :
please explain why you would disapprove of my proposal?
>> >
>> >On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 7:56 PM Zhenya Stanilovsky
>> >< arzamas...@mail.ru.invalid > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> alexpolovtcev please clarify what do you mean u
v please clarify what do you mean under : «possibility of
> >> using Guava in Ignite 3», using how necessary dependency of calcite or
> >> using like «using in our code» ? If using in code, i -1 here.
> >> thanks.
> >>
> >>
> >> >Hello, dear Ig
under : «possibility of
> > using Guava in Ignite 3», using how necessary dependency of calcite or
> > using like «using in our code» ? If using in code, i -1 here.
> > thanks.
> >
> >
> > >Hello, dear Igniters!
> > >
> > >I would like to di
, i -1 here.
>> thanks.
>>
>>
>> >Hello, dear Igniters!
>> >
>> >I would like to discuss the possibility of using Guava
>> >< https://github.com/google/guava > in Ignite 3. I know about the
>> restrictive
>> >policy of usin
ssibility of
> using Guava in Ignite 3», using how necessary dependency of calcite or
> using like «using in our code» ? If using in code, i -1 here.
> thanks.
>
>
> >Hello, dear Igniters!
> >
> >I would like to discuss the possibility of using Guava
>
der : «possibility of
>> using Guava in Ignite 3», using how necessary dependency of calcite or
>> using like «using in our code» ? If using in code, i -1 here.
>> thanks.
>>
>>
>> >Hello, dear Igniters!
>> >
>> >I would like to discuss
do you mean under : «possibility of
> using Guava in Ignite 3», using how necessary dependency of calcite or
> using like «using in our code» ? If using in code, i -1 here.
> thanks.
>
>
> >Hello, dear Igniters!
> >
> >I would like to discuss the possibility of using Guava
of using Guava
>< https://github.com/google/guava > in Ignite 3. I know about the restrictive
>policy of using it in Ignite 2, but I have the following reasons:
>
>1. We are de-facto using it already as an implicit dependency, since the
>Calcite module depends on it, and Calcit
> > > +1, I considered it a necessary evil
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Konstantin Orlov
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 5 Aug 2021, at 16:37, Alexei Scherbakov <
> > alexey.scherbak...@gmail.
t; > > чт, 5 авг. 2021 г. в 16:12, Alexander Polovtcev <
> alexpolovt...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >
> > >> Hello, dear Igniters!
> > >>
> > >> I would like to discuss the possibility of using Guava
> > >> <https://github.com/google/guav
>> Regards,
>> Konstantin Orlov
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 5 Aug 2021, at 16:37, Alexei Scherbakov < alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com >
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > чт, 5 авг. 2021 г. в 16:12, Alexander Polovtcev < alexpolovt
ander Polovtcev >> :
>>>
>>>> Hello, dear Igniters!
>>>>
>>>> I would like to discuss the possibility of using Guava
>>>> <https://github.com/google/guava> in Ignite 3. I know about the
>>>> restrictive
>>>
> Regards,
> Konstantin Orlov
>
>
>
> > On 5 Aug 2021, at 16:37, Alexei Scherbakov
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > чт, 5 авг. 2021 г. в 16:12, Alexander Polovtcev >:
> >
> >> Hello, dear Igniters!
> >>
> >> I would like
he possibility of using Guava
>> <https://github.com/google/guava> in Ignite 3. I know about the
>> restrictive
>> policy of using it in Ignite 2, but I have the following reasons:
>>
>> 1. We are de-facto using it already as an implicit dependency, since the
>&g
+1
чт, 5 авг. 2021 г. в 16:12, Alexander Polovtcev :
> Hello, dear Igniters!
>
> I would like to discuss the possibility of using Guava
> <https://github.com/google/guava> in Ignite 3. I know about the
> restrictive
> policy of using it in Ignite 2, but I have the foll
Hello, dear Igniters!
I would like to discuss the possibility of using Guava
<https://github.com/google/guava> in Ignite 3. I know about the restrictive
policy of using it in Ignite 2, but I have the following reasons:
1. We are de-facto using it already as an implicit dependency,
29 matches
Mail list logo
