[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855868#action_12855868
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-2591:
Do we have cases where this is needed? AFAIUI none
Hi
We're running a multi-threaded application which creates/updates nodes
in jackrabbit. Here's an outline of the deployment model:-
- The jackrabbit web app is deployed to the same tomcat instance as our
main app.
- The jackrabbit repository is accessed from our app using RMI.
- We use
Hi,
- The jackrabbit repository is accessed from our app using RMI.
Can you use the repository in embedded mode? That would help a lot.
embedded Derby database
We've tested using postgres
I would test the H2 database if you have time.
Regards,
Thomas
George
If you read the documentation you will see RMI is not the recommended mode
of access. Foo whole EJB saga had so much stories about RMI horrors or
whatever.
Best is to use Jackrabbit in embeded mode and expose Remoting layer like
Rest, etc.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:05 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OCM-43?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855881#action_12855881
]
Jukka Zitting commented on OCM-43:
--
Any update on the failing tests?
PS. Quite a large part
Thomas
Thanks for the update. I'll try both.
With regard to concurrency, are there any plans for jackrabbit to support
concurrency out of the box? I did see a thread in the mailing list, but wasn't
sure of the outcome.
Regards
George
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Müller
Hallo,
I need help on this Jackrabbit AccessManager.
I have custome AccessManager, providing access security based on the logged
account and the permissions an account has. Basically, the permissions apply
over a folder (kind of) - one can see a folder, put some items in it, edit
these items,
AbstractLoginModule logs a warning on anonymous logins
--
Key: JCR-2600
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2600
Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
Issue Type: Bug
Hi,
With regard to concurrency, are there any plans for jackrabbit to support
concurrency out of the box?
If you use one session for each thread then it should already work.
It's a bug if it doesn't.
In any case I would use one session per thread, no matter if a future
version of Jackrabbit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jukka Zitting resolved JCR-2600.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in revision 933203 and merged to the 2.1 branch in revision 933209.
Thomas
We still hit problems when we attempted to add nodes, concurrently, to existing
nodes (I think the message was something like attempting to update a node that
is already being updated). We had to lock the node, update, and then release.
Regards
George
-Original Message-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jukka Zitting resolved JCR-2457.
Assignee: Jukka Zitting
Resolution: Fixed
The code has been integrated to trunk and the 2.1
This looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2579 ?
On 4/12/10 9:25 AM, george.sib...@bt.com wrote:
Thomas
We still hit problems when we attempted to add nodes, concurrently, to
existing nodes (I think the message was something like attempting to update
a node that is already
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855995#action_12855995
]
Arthur Meyer commented on JCR-1242:
---
Can we update and apply this patch? This patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arthur Meyer updated JCR-1242:
--
Attachment: JCR-1242_update.patch
Attached updated version of the original patch
Improve serialization
Yes, exactly.
Many thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Edelson [mailto:justinedel...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 April 2010 15:38
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Jackrabbit 1.6.0 Write Performance
This looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2579 ?
On 4/12/10 9:25
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-trunk-tests-java14/435/
--
Started by upstream project Jackrabbit-trunk build number
Building remotely on vesta.apache.org (Ubuntu)
Updating
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Apache Hudson Server
hud...@hudson.zones.apache.org wrote:
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-trunk-tests-java14/435/
[...]
Building remotely on vesta.apache.org (Ubuntu)
[...]
Reason: Cannot find parent:
Is there any good way to flush the event queue in Jackrabbit 2? I'm
trying to do this in the context of an integration test. I can get the
effect I want using SynchronousEventListener, but this creates a
Jackrabbit dependency in a place where their shouldn't be one.
Thanks,
Justin
19 matches
Mail list logo