Hi,
I was having a look at KernelRootBuilder.update() which saves pending
changes down to a branch in the Microkernel after a certain threshold in
the number of changes. I was wondering if this has any effect at all.
The branch is never merged back. Or is that branch only used as a
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
I was having a look at KernelRootBuilder.update() which saves pending
changes down to a branch in the Microkernel after a certain threshold in the
number of changes. I was wondering if this has any effect at all. The
On 16.11.12 13:00, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
I was having a look at KernelRootBuilder.update() which saves pending
changes down to a branch in the Microkernel after a certain threshold in the
number of changes. I was
Hi,
As you may have noticed from the past few commits, I'm working on
better integrating the MongoMK to our normal build. The idea is to
always build the MongoMK components so we wouldn't need the extra
-Pmongomk profile anymore. To do this I'm instructing the test cases
that depend on a MongoDB
Hi Jukka,
Thanks for setting this up. One minor issue though. The MongoMK build used
to take around 2 minutes (see withoutJukkasChanges.txt) but with your
changes from yesterday, it takes around 8.5 minutes (see
withJukkasChanges.txt). Tests take much longer. This is probably due to
how
On 15.11.2012, at 12:59, Stefan Guggisberg stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
personally i am not aware of real life use cases requiring 'large' mv
properties.
since the ultimate goal of oak is to provide a JCR implementation and the
JCR API doesn't provide any methods to manipulate/access
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith m...@pooteeweet.org wrote:
which is the reason why it would be great to add hash maps to JCR. storing
hash maps
as nodes with a single property is simple not efficient with an interpreted
language
where there is native support for
On Nov 16, 2012, at 13:18 , Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith m...@pooteeweet.org
wrote:
which is the reason why it would be great to add hash maps to JCR. storing
hash maps
as nodes with a single property is simple not
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith m...@pooteeweet.org wrote:
I fail to see how it makes sense to use nodes for this. Not only for the
above stated
reasons but also in terms of querying.
Oak supports pluggable indexing, so it's straightforward to index
content in child
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith m...@pooteeweet.org
wrote:
...i really feel like this is a clash of worlds here ..
...and modularity is usually the answer in such cases ;-)
I'm only
10 matches
Mail list logo
