Re: Incubating Chemistry

2009-04-26 Thread David Nuescheler
Hi guys, i think we definitely have to distinguish between the JCR bindings of Chemistry and a specific repository implementations bindings. The JCR bindings of Chemistry make up a big part of my interest in Chemistry as a project, so I would really be interested in keeping those around in Chemist

Re: Incubating Chemistry

2009-04-25 Thread Florent Guillaume
On 24 Apr 2009, at 07:51, Felix Meschberger wrote: Jukka Zitting schrieb: On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Florent Guillaume wrote: Also I had envisionned the Jackrabbit-specific backend living in the Jackrabbit project, to simplify inter-projects dependency management (as Chemistry is an

Re: Incubating Chemistry

2009-04-23 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Jukka Zitting schrieb: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Florent Guillaume wrote: >> Note that I'll need Metro bindings for WS as well, as we want to test >> interop with both CXF and Metro. But the core code should be generic in any >> case. > > OK, cool. Metro looks like it could

Re: Incubating Chemistry

2009-04-23 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Florent Guillaume wrote: > Note that I'll need Metro bindings for WS as well, as we want to test > interop with both CXF and Metro. But the core code should be generic in any > case. OK, cool. Metro looks like it could be a bit troublesome from a licensing pe

Re: Incubating Chemistry

2009-04-23 Thread Florent Guillaume
On 23 Apr 2009, at 16:48, Jukka Zitting wrote: On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jukka Zitting > wrote: Thanks to everyone who's been participating in writing up the proposal; I think it's soon ready to be voted on! See [1] for the current status. [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChemistryPr

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-23 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Thanks to everyone who's been participating in writing up the > proposal; I think it's soon ready to be voted on! See [1] for the > current status. > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChemistryProposal I just filled in the last TO

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-22 Thread Paolo Mottadelli
Hi Jukka, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > In general I'd restrict the set of initial committers to people who've > already been contributing to the initial codebases or the related > discussions. Thanks for this clarification. I agree with your valuable suggestion. Engage

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jukka Zitting > wrote: >> * We now only have volunteer mentors from Day. The normal diversity >> rules don't really apply to mentors, but it would still be good to >> have someone with a different

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Thomas Müller
Hi, I downloaded a word list from http://wordlist.sourceforge.net and ran: grep -i -R --include=* -E 'c.?m.?i.?s' . grep -i -R --include=* 'c.*m.*i[^s]*s' . This got me a long list, including: chromis cinematics combfish comics commissar crimison blackmails buckminster occamist (from Occam's raz

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > * We now only have volunteer mentors from Day. The normal diversity > rules don't really apply to mentors, but it would still be good to > have someone with a different perspective join us as a mentor. Note > that you need to be an Apache m

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Julian Reschke
Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Serge Huber wrote: But I would miss the current name, as I agree it is good :) Me too. How about if we just slightly modified it, say to "Apache Chemi" or something similar? "Chemist" BR, Julian (helping to paint the bikeshed :-))

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Serge Huber
or "Chemis" ? Regards, Serge Huber. On 21 avr. 09, at 16:43, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Serge Huber wrote: But I would miss the current name, as I agree it is good :) Me too. How about if we just slightly modified it, say to "Apache Chemi" or something

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Serge Huber wrote: > But I would miss the current name, as I agree it is good :) Me too. How about if we just slightly modified it, say to "Apache Chemi" or something similar? BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Serge Huber
Thank you Torgeir, I remember this being mentioned a while ago, but I was mostly hoping to help if need be. But I would miss the current name, as I agree it is good :) Regards, Serge Huber. On 21 avr. 09, at 16:36, Torgeir Veimo wrote: It is a play on the letters; CheMIStry. 2009/4/22

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Torgeir Veimo
It is a play on the letters; CheMIStry. 2009/4/22 Serge Huber > > I might be jumping the gun a little, but if this can help, here are a few > name suggestions : > > Apache Plug > Apache Content Plug > Apache Jackplug > Apache Sea Miss (ok it's an awful word game :)) (or could be written > Seamis

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Serge Huber
I might be jumping the gun a little, but if this can help, here are a few name suggestions : Apache Plug Apache Content Plug Apache Jackplug Apache Sea Miss (ok it's an awful word game :)) (or could be written Seamis, or Seemis) Apache Startle (Jackrabbit synonym) But I must admit the nam

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > I'll now ping the gene...@incubator.apache.org list for some early > comments on the proposal. See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general/21727 for the Incubator thread. There are some concerns over the name "Chem

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Serge Huber wrote: > I am very interested in this project also, but I think it would be much too > early for me to get commitership on this, as I need to first "prove" myself > again, as an alumni of Jackrabbit :) Cool, you're welcome to join as a contributor

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Serge Huber
I am very interested in this project also, but I think it would be much too early for me to get commitership on this, as I need to first "prove" myself again, as an alumni of Jackrabbit :) Regards, Serge

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Dominique Pfister
Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > * Anyone else interested in joining as an initial committer? > Dominique? It's of course possible to join also later, but then we'll > need to go through the standard from-patches-to-committership process. Oops, sorry for being late! I

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-20 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > So, I've created a skeleton proposal [1] for "Apache Chemistry", a > project that would be based on the Chemistry code developed at Nuxeo > and the JCR-CMIS code in the Jackrabbit sandbox. Feel free to edit the > proposal and mark yourse

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-16 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi Jukka, Thanks alot. I just added my name to the list of nominated mentors. Regards Felix Jukka Zitting schrieb: > Hi, > > Our original plan for the CMIS efforts was to manage them as organic > growth within Jackrabbit, essentially developing the code in the > Jackrabbit sandbox and inviting

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-16 Thread Florent Guillaume
On 16 Apr 2009, at 15:38, Jukka Zitting wrote: Our original plan for the CMIS efforts was to manage them as organic growth within Jackrabbit, essentially developing the code in the Jackrabbit sandbox and inviting CMIS contributors as Jackrabbit committers based on their contributions. However, i

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-16 Thread Paolo Mottadelli
Hi, On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > However, it seems that with quite a bit of interest around this and > with the codebase and potential committers having just a little > overlap with Jackrabbit core, it might be better to take the effort to > the Apache Incubator where t

Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-16 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, Our original plan for the CMIS efforts was to manage them as organic growth within Jackrabbit, essentially developing the code in the Jackrabbit sandbox and inviting CMIS contributors as Jackrabbit committers based on their contributions. However, it seems that with quite a bit of interest ar