ebal Suiu wrote:
>
> Jcrom is definitely good: simple, powerful with a good documentation.
>
> Thanks,
> Decebal
>
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/JCROM-and-Jackrabbit-OCM-tp547306p613931.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Jcrom is definitely good: simple, powerful with a good documentation.
Thanks,
Decebal
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JCROM-and-Jackrabbit-OCM-tp25255760p25783950.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
for things like filling in the IP clearance
> template [2].
>
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
> [2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.c
tion, JCROM (http://jcrom.org).
>
> Therefore I'm wondering whether there is any interest from you Jackrabbit
> people to take over the code base and possibly integrate it into your
> Jackrabbit OCM?
>
> Cheers,
> OGG
>
--
View this message in context:
Hi.
I for one have not used OCM. It seems to complicated and I feel that I loose
control. No offence intendend :-) As for JCROM, I really like it. Have used
it for some time, but have had doubt since it has not been very well
maintained. It is simple and lightweight - just as I like it. Will be ha
Hi,
Concerning Jackrabbit OCM,I am (unfortunately) the only committer for
the project.
For the moment, I have no time to work on it. That's the reason why
the code didn't change for a long time.
Maybe I'm wrong but I think it is almost the same for JCROM. In a
such situation, it should be nice t
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Jason Thrasher wrote:
> What's the status of JCROM -> Jackrabbit idea, and OCM in Jackrabbit in
> general? It's not clear from reading the website, or the lists.
There seems to be general interest to bringing JCROM to Jackrabbit,
and so far I see nobody obje
se you don't have time
> > to do that anymore? I'd rather not to adopt a codebase that nobody is
> > working on.
> >
> > BR,
> >
> > Jukka Zitting
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/JCROM-and-Jackrabbit-OCM-tp25255760p25641695.html
> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
er not to adopt a codebase that nobody is
> working on.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JCROM-and-Jackrabbit-OCM-tp25255760p25641695.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ep
>> up to fix issues and work on new features in case you don't have time
>> to do that anymore? I'd rather not to adopt a codebase that nobody is
>> working on.
>>
>> BR,
>>
>> Jukka Zitting
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JCROM-and-Jackrabbit-OCM-tp25255760p25514021.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> to do that anymore? I'd rather not to adopt a codebase that nobody is
> working on.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JCROM-and-Jackrabbit-OCM-tp25255760p25273041.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:31 PM, ogg wrote:
> I'm finding that I have less and less time to maintain my open source JCR
> object mapping solution, JCROM (http://jcrom.org).
>
> Therefore I'm wondering whether there is any interest from you Jackrabbit
> people to take over the code base and poss
Jackrabbit OCM?
Cheers,
OGG
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JCROM-and-Jackrabbit-OCM-tp25255760p25255760.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
13 matches
Mail list logo
