Jena Eyeball

2013-10-22 Thread Phil Coates
Hi, Is anyone actively working on Eyeball at the moment? We're developing some applications where we'd love to use it for validation of ontologies and for checking uploaded RDF against these ontologies (amongst other things, e.g. SPARQL-based inspection) If we use it, it would be handy if it

Proposal: migrate schemagen-maven to Apache

2013-10-22 Thread Ian Dickinson
I have a side project which allows Schemagen to be run as a maven target, (i.e. directly from the POM, without using ant-call): https://github.com/ephemerian/schemagen-maven I'm proposing to migrate that project to Apache Jena, by adding it as a maven module that will be generated and published

Re: Jena Eyeball

2013-10-22 Thread Chris Dollin
On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 11:13:52 AM Phil Coates wrote: Is anyone actively working on Eyeball at the moment? I'm [1] not actively working on it at the moment, partly because I'd like other people involved ... We're developing some applications where we'd love to use it for validation of

Re: Jena Eyeball

2013-10-22 Thread Mike Grove
fwiw, if someone is going to update Eyeball, doing so wrt to what's been going on in RDF validation [1] might make sense. Cheers, Mike [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/12/rdf-val/ On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Chris Dollin chris.dol...@epimorphics.comwrote: On Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Re: Jena Eyeball

2013-10-22 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 22/10/13 13:54, Chris Dollin wrote: On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 11:13:52 AM Phil Coates wrote: ... Could it then be moved over to Apache with the rest of Jena? That would take a vote, I believe. Not need in this case because it was covered by the HP Software Grant that moved the code

Re: Re: Jena Eyeball

2013-10-22 Thread Chris Dollin
On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 01:54:37 PM Chris Dollin wrote: On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 11:13:52 AM Phil Coates wrote: If we use it, it would be handy if it was in a Maven-friendly format; if no-one is currently doing any active development of the project, would anyone have any

Re: Jena Eyeball

2013-10-22 Thread Phil Coates
Great, where should I start? I can pull a version of the source from https://svn.apache.org/repos/** asf/jena/Import/Jena-CVS/**Eyeball/https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/Import/Jena-CVS/Eyeball/ into GitHub and work on a simple migration of v2.3 from Ant to Maven there (should the version go

Re: Re: Jena Eyeball

2013-10-22 Thread Phil Coates
Wow, Chris, that's fantastic! I'm pulling it now and will have a look :) On 22 October 2013 14:26, Chris Dollin chris.dol...@epimorphics.com wrote: On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 01:54:37 PM Chris Dollin wrote: On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 11:13:52 AM Phil Coates wrote: If we use it, it

Re: Proposal: migrate schemagen-maven to Apache

2013-10-22 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 22/10/13 13:07, Ian Dickinson wrote: I have a side project which allows Schemagen to be run as a maven target, (i.e. directly from the POM, without using ant-call): https://github.com/ephemerian/schemagen-maven I'm proposing to migrate that project to Apache Jena, by adding it as a maven

Re: Re: Re: Jena Eyeball

2013-10-22 Thread Chris Dollin
On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 02:33:26 PM Phil Coates wrote: Wow, Chris, that's fantastic! I'm pulling it now and will have a look :) Feel free to be rude about my use of Maven. We don't get along with each other well. The current POMs job is mostly to produce a stand-alone executable eyeball

Re: Proposal: migrate schemagen-maven to Apache

2013-10-22 Thread Chris Dollin
On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 01:07:55 PM Ian Dickinson wrote: I have a side project which allows Schemagen to be run as a maven target, (i.e. directly from the POM, without using ant-call): https://github.com/ephemerian/schemagen-maven I'm proposing to migrate that project to Apache Jena,

Re: Re: Re: Jena Eyeball

2013-10-22 Thread Phil Coates
Does anyone have any objections if I make a few changes: 1) reformat code style towards more standard KR-style (basically IDE autoformat, nothing particularly controversial: e.g. 4 spaces per indent, opening curly brace on same line, etc.) 2) Use Java 5+ where relevant (e.g. foreach, generics)

Re: Re: Re: Re: Jena Eyeball

2013-10-22 Thread Chris Dollin
On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 03:40:17 PM Phil Coates wrote: Does anyone have any objections if I make a few changes: 1) reformat code style towards more standard KR-style (basically IDE autoformat, nothing particularly controversial: e.g. 4 spaces per indent, opening curly brace on same