[jira] [Commented] (JENA-763) Transforms should interact better with custom operators

2014-08-12 Thread Rob Vesse (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14094528#comment-14094528 ] Rob Vesse commented on JENA-763: bq. I don't understand why you should have to override Alg

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JENA-763) Transforms should interact better with custom operators

2014-08-12 Thread Rob Vesse (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14094528#comment-14094528 ] Rob Vesse edited comment on JENA-763 at 8/12/14 7:09 PM: - bq. I don'

[jira] [Updated] (JENA-763) Transforms should interact better with custom operators

2014-08-12 Thread Rob Vesse (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Vesse updated JENA-763: --- Attachment: Jena673.java Attaching a minimal example that can be used to see the issue we are experiencing. T

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-712) ARQ serialises queries and updates using relative URIs but does not include a BASE clause

2014-08-12 Thread Tim Harsch (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14094452#comment-14094452 ] Tim Harsch commented on JENA-712: - I wrote a test case for this issue. I was going to re-op

Re: Sparql in rules - How's it going?

2014-08-12 Thread Miguel Bento Alves
Ok Andy, perhaps was my error when I did the document. As I said, I will finish until there. The (new) engine to evaluate rules combined with more that one term I will finish after the end of the project. Miguel On 12 Aug 2014, at 18:41, Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 12/08/14 16:39, Miguel Bento

Re: Sparql in rules - How's it going?

2014-08-12 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 12/08/14 16:39, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: Hi Andy, I finished the coding. I’m preparing the documentation and I will prepare the patch. In schedule that I presented in my document, the forecast for the end of the project was 29. In the remaining time, I wish to implement an engine to eval

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-763) Transforms should interact better with custom operators

2014-08-12 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14094363#comment-14094363 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-763: Could we experiment in a branch rather than experim

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-763) Transforms should interact better with custom operators

2014-08-12 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14094287#comment-14094287 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-763: -- Commit 1617524

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-763) Transforms should interact better with custom operators

2014-08-12 Thread Rob Vesse (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14094247#comment-14094247 ] Rob Vesse commented on JENA-763: I will have a go at opening up the quad form transform as a

[jira] [Assigned] (JENA-763) Transforms should interact better with custom operators

2014-08-12 Thread Rob Vesse (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Vesse reassigned JENA-763: -- Assignee: Rob Vesse > Transforms should interact better with custom operators > -

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-763) Transforms should interact better with custom operators

2014-08-12 Thread Rob Vesse (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14094238#comment-14094238 ] Rob Vesse commented on JENA-763: Another complex case where doing quad form transform first

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JENA-763) Transforms should interact better with custom operators

2014-08-12 Thread Rob Vesse (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14094229#comment-14094229 ] Rob Vesse edited comment on JENA-763 at 8/12/14 4:08 PM: - bq. Is the

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-763) Transforms should interact better with custom operators

2014-08-12 Thread Rob Vesse (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14094229#comment-14094229 ] Rob Vesse commented on JENA-763: bq. Is the assumption that the quad transform is done first

Re: Sparql in rules - How's it going?

2014-08-12 Thread Miguel Bento Alves
Hi Andy, I finished the coding. I’m preparing the documentation and I will prepare the patch. In schedule that I presented in my document, the forecast for the end of the project was 29. In the remaining time, I wish to implement an engine to evaluate rules with Sparql commands combined with

Re: Sparql in rules - How's it going?

2014-08-12 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 06/08/14 16:47, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: ... "There is one piece of wrapping up which is to make sure that you have the latest jena-core code, prepare a patch file that captures your chnages and additions then attach to the GSoC JIRA.” Ok, I will do that. Miguel Just a reminder - we're i

Re: GSoC: CSV Property Tables.

2014-08-12 Thread Andy Seaborne
Ying, We're in the last week now - 18 August (19:00 UTC) is the firm 'pencils down' date and time. A message to users@ announcing the work would be good! Andy

Re: Graph SPI Contract (Transactions)

2014-08-12 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 12/08/14 14:21, Claude Warren wrote: I just realized that we don't have any distinction between read and write transactions at the graph level. Perhaps we should add that in V3. There are no native ACID implementations of graph transactions (that was in the RDB code). Graph transaction !=

Re: Graph SPI Contract (Transactions)

2014-08-12 Thread Claude Warren
I just realized that we don't have any distinction between read and write transactions at the graph level. Perhaps we should add that in V3. For V2 the transaction must imply a write lock and my example above can not be done at the graph level. It can be executed at a level that provides a view

Re: extract query patterns

2014-08-12 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 12/08/14 11:24, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: Hi Andy, with your example I can extract the triples but I can’t extract the sub-queries. Is there a simple way to extract the sub-queries from a query pattern? Miguel The code needs to walk down the syntax tree from the top looking for ElementS

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JENA-763) Transforms should interact better with custom operators

2014-08-12 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14093954#comment-14093954 ] Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-763 at 8/12/14 10:57 AM: --

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JENA-763) Transforms should interact better with custom operators

2014-08-12 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14093954#comment-14093954 ] Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-763 at 8/12/14 10:57 AM: --

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-763) Transforms should interact better with custom operators

2014-08-12 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14093954#comment-14093954 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-763: I'm not clear what the issue is here in detail -- i

Re: extract query patterns

2014-08-12 Thread Miguel Bento Alves
Hi Andy, with your example I can extract the triples but I can’t extract the sub-queries. Is there a simple way to extract the sub-queries from a query pattern? Miguel On 08 Aug 2014, at 21:10, Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 08/08/14 10:15, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In a Sparql

Re: Graph SPI Contract (Transactions)

2014-08-12 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 12/08/14 08:58, Claude Warren wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: Transactions: The text around transactions does not distinguish being inside or outside a transaction. There are 2 base kinds of graphs - ones in datasets (views) and standalone ones, then things

Re: Graph SPI Contract (Transactions)

2014-08-12 Thread Claude Warren
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > Transactions: > > The text around transactions does not distinguish being inside or outside > a transaction. > > There are 2 base kinds of graphs - ones in datasets (views) and standalone > ones, then things like InfGraph and other added