[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (JENA-1037) jena-osgi

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne updated JENA-1037: Comment: was deleted (was: Commit 60cdb4ab2bc150c41fd18f16750fc5d8efaadd04 in jena's branch

Re: TDB/Lizard/TDB 2 Replication

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Rob Vesse wrote: > Comments inline: > > On 12/11/2015 06:31, "Andy Seaborne" wrote: > > >On 12/11/15 00:42, Rob Vesse wrote: > >> Andy > >> > >> I was talking to some folks at a major bank the other day about TDB and >

[GitHub] jena pull request: JENA-624

Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/94#issuecomment-156126355 @afs Squashed 'em pretty flat. The first commit is journaling operation, the second is the new in-memory design. I will wait to hear from you, otherwise moving on

Re: TDB/Lizard/TDB 2 Replication

On 12/11/15 00:42, Rob Vesse wrote: Andy I was talking to some folks at a major bank the other day about TDB and got an interesting question that I didn't have an answer to. Essentially they were interested in learning how you would provide replication and hot-standy with TDB For current

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-624) Develop a new in-memory RDF Dataset implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15002181#comment-15002181 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-624: - Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-624) Develop a new in-memory RDF Dataset implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15002246#comment-15002246 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-624: - Github user afs commented on the pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-624) Develop a new in-memory RDF Dataset implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15002299#comment-15002299 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-624: - Github user afs commented on the pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-624) Develop a new in-memory RDF Dataset implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1500#comment-1500 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-624: - Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-624) Develop a new in-memory RDF Dataset implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15002287#comment-15002287 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-624: - Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request: JENA-624

Github user afs commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/94#issuecomment-156148758 It is not the code - it's the way tests are found. This is what seems to be happening - when running the JUnit tests on the package (at least in Eclipse and I believe

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-624) Develop a new in-memory RDF Dataset implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15002210#comment-15002210 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-624: - Github user afs commented on the pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request: JENA-624

Github user afs commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/94#issuecomment-156132377 Great. You don't need `/testing`. The material under there is for testing query execution, not the dataset storage. For functional tests,

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-624) Develop a new in-memory RDF Dataset implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15002214#comment-15002214 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-624: - Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-624) Develop a new in-memory RDF Dataset implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15002220#comment-15002220 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-624: - Github user afs commented on the pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request: JENA-624

Github user afs commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/94#issuecomment-156135092 and `AbstractTestTransaction`. Think that's it. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] jena pull request: JENA-624

Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/94#issuecomment-156146622 It occurs to me that a better way to explain myself is: `TestDatasetGraphInMemory` looks the way it does (lots of nested classes) because I wanted to keep the usual

[GitHub] jena pull request: JENA-624

Github user afs commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/94#issuecomment-156140079 All this can be refined post merge. I've been checking that the existing test hierarchies run as well. `TestDatasetGraphInMemory` and `TestInMemory` seem to both call

Re: TDB/Lizard/TDB 2 Replication

Comments inline: On 12/11/2015 06:31, "Andy Seaborne" wrote: >On 12/11/15 00:42, Rob Vesse wrote: >> Andy >> >> I was talking to some folks at a major bank the other day about TDB and >>got >> an interesting question that I didn't have an answer to. Essentially >>they >> were

[GitHub] jena pull request: JENA-624

Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/94#issuecomment-156149841 Ah, I didn't realize that we were using the automatic "execute-by-naming-convention" test running as well as the explicit style of gathering things up into suites. I'll

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-624) Develop a new in-memory RDF Dataset implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15002305#comment-15002305 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-624: - Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request: