Replies inline.
ajs6f
> On Dec 12, 2018, at 1:25 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> I'd like to move the site.
+1!
> On 12/12/2018 15:25, ajs6f wrote:
>> I'm all in favor, and in favor of moving the site to git at the same time.
>> Indeed, we've discussed that latter before, but done nothing.
>>
ki JS web
> layer later, as backbone.js isn't being used much lately, and we could try
> something simpler perhaps).
>
>
> Cheers
> Bruno
>
>
>
> From: Andy Seaborne
> To: dev@jena.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 13 Decem
runo
From: Andy Seaborne
To: dev@jena.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 13 December 2018 7:29 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move Jena repo to gitbox or github
On 12/12/2018 15:53, Chris Tomlinson wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
>> On Dec 12, 2018, at 7:35 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>
December 2018 7:25 AM
Subject: website to git Re: [DISCUSS] Move Jena repo to gitbox or github
I'd like to move the site.
On 12/12/2018 15:25, ajs6f wrote:
> I'm all in favor, and in favor of moving the site to git at the same time.
> Indeed, we've discussed that latter before, but done n
From: ajs6f
To: dev@jena.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 13 December 2018 4:25 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move Jena repo to gitbox or github
I'm all in favor, and in favor of moving the site to git at the same time.
Indeed, we've discussed that latter before, but done nothing.
Bruno-- I
On 12/12/2018 15:53, Chris Tomlinson wrote:
Hi Andy,
On Dec 12, 2018, at 7:35 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 11/12/2018 17:19, Chris Tomlinson wrote:
Hi Andy,
My GH and ASF accounts are linked. As I understand the note from D.Gruno once
jena is moved to GB then we can use either GB or GH
I'd like to move the site.
On 12/12/2018 15:25, ajs6f wrote:
I'm all in favor, and in favor of moving the site to git at the same time.
Indeed, we've discussed that latter before, but done nothing.
Bruno-- I think you had some thoughts about the site question? I seem to
remember that you did
Hi Andy,
> On Dec 12, 2018, at 7:35 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/12/2018 17:19, Chris Tomlinson wrote:
>> Hi Andy,
>> My GH and ASF accounts are linked. As I understand the note from D.Gruno
>> once jena is moved to GB then we can use either GB or GH or both in our
>> individual
I'm all in favor, and in favor of moving the site to git at the same time.
Indeed, we've discussed that latter before, but done nothing.
Bruno-- I think you had some thoughts about the site question? I seem to
remember that you did such a migration with another Apache project?
ajs6f
> On Dec
On 11/12/2018 17:19, Chris Tomlinson wrote:
Hi Andy,
My GH and ASF accounts are linked. As I understand the note from D.Gruno once
jena is moved to GB then we can use either GB or GH or both in our individual
workflows. For me just working with GH would be my choice.
I’m not sure how far
Hi Andy,
My GH and ASF accounts are linked. As I understand the note from D.Gruno once
jena is moved to GB then we can use either GB or GH or both in our individual
workflows. For me just working with GH would be my choice.
I’m not sure how far away 3.10.0 is (I’ve completed all of the
I've linked my account (many months ago). It changed nothing at all, not in
Github, not elsewhere. I think we need to make the move for the project as a
whole before that happens.
(At a conference, but will try to reply to the larger migration question
today-- TL;DR: I'm in favor.)
ajs6f
>
Committers -
Who has the link up for pushing to GH directly?
https://gitbox.apache.org/ -> "Link GitHub and ASF accounts"
Andy
On 10/12/2018 16:11, Andy Seaborne wrote:
I confess I don't completely understand the details/changes here
"either the ASF repository system (gitbox.apache.org)
I confess I don't completely understand the details/changes here
"either the ASF repository system (gitbox.apache.org) OR GitHub for your
development and code pushes"
unless you can mix-and-match, in case anyone does not want to forced to
have a GH account. gitbox.apache.org says "will be
14 matches
Mail list logo
