On 03/02/15 00:46, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
Ouch.. seems like a bug in Maven (or more likely) this magic
org.rzo.yajsw.os.posix.PosixProcess used by org.everit.osgi.
I guess setting it manually with -Djna.nosys=true didn't help either?
Another reason to have a quick look at the PAX Exam
Uhm, well must admit I have no clue as to why JNA should be involved in the
first place. If it happens on your machine on two JDKs I guess it could
happen to anyone.
I suggest was try to go with the alternative PAX test I made for JENA-879
instead, even if its not as maintainable
On 03/02/15 09:07, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
then I can put in the pull request.
BTW - if the PR comment has the string JENA-879 in it, then it should
get referenced by the JIRA. After what seems like a few dropped emails,
we seem to be back connected for github/asf emails so it would be
On 02/02/15 11:33, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
1/ Build failure
jena-osgi-test fails the build in step verify
tried: java-8-openjdk and java-7-openjdk
Exception in thread main java.lang.Error:
There is an incompatible JNA native library installed on this system.
To
Ouch.. seems like a bug in Maven (or more likely) this magic
org.rzo.yajsw.os.posix.PosixProcess used by org.everit.osgi.
I guess setting it manually with -Djna.nosys=true didn't help either?
Another reason to have a quick look at the PAX Exam (JENA-879) - which
I'm in the middle of now. It's
On 2 February 2015 at 13:11, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
As far as I know, we can not ship source-release that pulls in LGPL, even to
test, without the user making an explicit act to knowingly do that and work
without it.
Some relevant LEGAL issues (which don't really clarify as they
So the jena-osgi-test is not needed for *building* any artifacts
(except itself, which doesn't depend on LGPL but probably need not be
pushed to Maven central anyway). jena-osgi-test is not required for
anything else. The test is only run during the integration-test phase
(which happens during mvn
The maven-bundle-plugin + the pax-exam tools make for a full AL
solution to making bundles and testing bundles.
See, for example:
https://github.com/basis-technology-corp/tcl-regex-java
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/02/15 11:33, Stian Soiland-Reyes
On 02/02/15 11:33, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
2/ There is a LGPL dependency (scope test) which needs investigation.
(I would have appreciated that having been pointed out first)
Sorry, I didn't mention this outside the pom.xml as it was a
build/test dependency, which I thought would be OK -
Thanks for the hint, Benson! I had looked at PAX before without
figuring it out, but this time I found more documentation, and it
looks like it is definitely worth a try (even if it has a bit more
heavyweight setup than eosgi).
Tracked as:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-879
(I'm
On 1 February 2015 at 13:12, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
Current status:
* Pull request merged
Thanks!
* jena-osgi-test commented out of the build
* Fatal problem building
* LGPL issue (not an issue ATM as not in the build)
Oh no :-(
1/ Build failure
jena-osgi-test
As do I!
I added to the pull request
systemProperties
!-- We don't care if there are any JNAs --
jna.nosystrue/jna.nosys
/systemProperties
to both enviroment according to
http://www.everit.org/eosgi-maven-plugin/#environment_settings
On 02/02/15 11:33, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
I'm not sure what JNl library you have, possibly some OS X thing?
I'm on Ubuntu 14.10
Andy
Did you mean to just include the jena-osgi.jar in the apache-jena/
dist? It would add only 7 MB.
If on the otherside we do a separate download of jena-osgi, we
probably want a separate 'apache-' like dist ZIP/tar.gz instead of the
direct JAR file - not sure how well the mirrors (and anti virus
On 02/02/15 14:11, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
Tracked as:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-879
(I'm unable to assign it to myself in Jira - anyone else want to have a go?:-)
There are two roles here - the committer who lets it into the code base
the doer who makes the contribution.
On 02/02/15 13:30, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
So the jena-osgi-test is not needed for *building* any artifacts
(except itself, which doesn't depend on LGPL but probably need not be
pushed to Maven central anyway). jena-osgi-test is not required for
anything else. The test is only run during the
On 02/02/15 17:50, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
OK, agree that it should be easy out of the box to compile.
With remove you mean to move out of source code or just not include it
in the release?
Out of the source tree. That's clear cut.
Just disabling it in modules (or require the
OK, agree that it should be easy out of the box to compile.
With remove you mean to move out of source code or just not include it
in the release?
Just disabling it in modules (or require the -Papache-release flag)
would work for me.
The test source is IP and license clean - so there's no issue
On 02/02/15 11:53, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
Did you mean to just include the jena-osgi.jar in the apache-jena/
dist? It would add only 7 MB.
I think it's a different audience.
apache-jena-dist is for standalong use + source + javadoc.
I'd rather start cautious and add later, rather than
On 2 February 2015 at 17:03, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
I think it's a different audience.
apache-jena-dist is for standalong use + source + javadoc.
Right, that is what I would prefer as well.
So if/when we go for a Jena-OSGi download, it would be a separate one.
So you are happy
Current status:
* Pull request merged
* jena-osgi-test commented out of the build
* Fatal problem building
* LGPL issue (not an issue ATM as not in the build)
1/ Build failure
jena-osgi-test fails the build in step verify
tried: java-8-openjdk and java-7-openjdk
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/10
Conversations around this seem to have settled down around the latest
state of pull request 10 (to me as a non-OSGi person).
I propose to pull and merge this.
This message is lazy consensus (24hr minimum deadline) on pulling that
so that there will be
22 matches
Mail list logo
