Ok, so there's been a change...
I emailed Ted Farrell at Oracle to plead for Kenai source to be
released. He explained that would be too difficult right now due to
the license/code-vetting process require, which I understand. However,
he also said that Kenai was not actually going to be shut down.
At 9:07 AM -0600 2/8/10, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>We've already started moving some services off Kenai, unfortunately,
>and it may be best if we continue down that path. It would be nice to
>be completely self-managed, so no project site ever bumps us around
>again. But what do you all think?
I think this is good news, in that it gives some time to develop a good
strategy before self-hosting anything.
In between contemplating my own wiki pain for my own projects, and tweeting
with @RichardConroy about why more people aren't using more JVM languages, I
really feel there is a void here t
On 9 February 2010 18:47, Stephen Bannasch
wrote:
> While there are things I don't like about jira on codehaus I think the
> collected set of jruby issues and comments are a great resource and having
> used a bunch of other systems for issues I think Jira is the best.
I'm 100% sure that jira is
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Rob Heittman
wrote:
> I think this is good news, in that it gives some time to develop a good
> strategy before self-hosting anything.
We had already moved the git repo for JRuby off Kenai, and we had made
the decision to get our own JIRA instance set up. At this
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Stephen Bannasch
wrote:
> github does a great job with hosting git repos and making forking and sharing
> easy (but you already know this)
Yes, we like github, but right after we decided we would move directly
to github they were down for most of a day. That made
Perhaps this is too big a change at this point, but has anyone considered
redmine?
It is written in Ruby-on-rails which is a natural choice for JRuby people,
and is very extensible, so you can add a lot to it if you're not satisfied
with the base feature set. I personally much prefer the redmine-w
Even though I love Redmine and using it for my current project, I do not
think it is a good idea to migrate from JIRA to Redmine. JIRA's capability
as issue tracker is still way ahead of Redmine's issue tracker.
Considering the investment that this project already has in JIRA, it might
be better to
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 11:25 AM, DJ wrote:
> Considering the investment that this project already has in JIRA, it might
> be better to use JIRA Studio. JIRA Studio is basically the combination of
> all Atlassian's products which include Confluence for Wiki, FishEye for code
> search/statistics, e
