Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-794: Strictly Uniform Sticky Partitioner

Hi Artem, Thanks for the KIP! I have a few comments: 1. In the preamble of the proposed change section, there is still a mention of the -1 approach. My understanding is that we have moved away from it now. 2. I am a bit concerned by the trick suggested about the DefaultPartitioner and the Unifor

RE: Proposal to add IBM Power (ppc64le) to apache kafka jenkins CI

Thank you Mickael. Regards, Abhijit​ From: Mickael Maison Sent: 03 March 2022 22:06 To: dev Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Proposal to add IBM Power (ppc64le) to apache kafka jenkins CI Hi Abhijit, Nobody raised concerns so I went ahead an opened a PR to add ppc64le

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #737

See

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-13708) The metrics-core-2.2.0.jar on which Kafak depends has the open-source vulnerability CVE-2022-20621.

caoguangjie created KAFKA-13708: --- Summary: The metrics-core-2.2.0.jar on which Kafak depends has the open-source vulnerability CVE-2022-20621. Key: KAFKA-13708 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13708

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-794: Strictly Uniform Sticky Partitioner

Regarding `3`, we should only deprecate it if we're sure the new approach handles all cases better. Are we confident about that for both of the previous partitioners? Ismael On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 1:37 AM David Jacot wrote: > Hi Artem, > > Thanks for the KIP! I have a few comments: > > 1. In th

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-13706) org.apache.kafka.test.MockSelector doesn't remove closed connections from its 'ready' field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jacot resolved KAFKA-13706. - Fix Version/s: 3.2.0 Reviewer: David Jacot Assignee: Vincent Jiang Resol

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-824 Allowing dumping segmentlogs limiting the batches in the output

Hi Sergio, Thanks for the KIP. I don't know anything about the log segment internals, but the logic and implementation seem sound. Three questions: 1. Since the --max-batches-size unit is bytes, does it matter if that size doesn't align to a record boundary? 2. Can you add a check to make sur

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.1 #83

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #738

See

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-13709) Document exactly-once support for source connectors

Chris Egerton created KAFKA-13709: - Summary: Document exactly-once support for source connectors Key: KAFKA-13709 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13709 Project: Kafka Issue T

Jenkins build is unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.0 #181

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #739

See

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-794: Strictly Uniform Sticky Partitioner

Hi Artem, Thanks for your explanation and update to the KIP. Some comments: 5. In the description for `enable.adaptive.partitioning`, the `false` case, you said: > the producer will try to distribute messages uniformly. I think we should describe the possible skewing distribution. Otherwise, user

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-824 Allowing dumping segmentlogs limiting the batches in the output

Hi Sergio, Thanks for the KIP! One question: I saw there's a `max-message-size` argument that seems to do the same thing as you want. Could you help explain what's the difference between `max-message-size` and `max-batches-size`? Thank you. Luke On Sat, Mar 5, 2022 at 3:21 AM Kirk True wrote: