Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-966: Eligible Leader Replicas

Hi Colin 1. I think using the new config name is more clear. a. The unclean leader election is actually removed if unclean recovery is in use. b. Using multiple values in unclean.leader.election.enable is confusing and it will be more confusing after people forget about this

Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support

It looks like the KIP has been updated to say that the builds are nighly. With this change I am +1 (binding). Thanks for working on this, Vaibhav. I believe you can close the vote and mark this KIP as passed, unless anyone else has comments. Maybe give a day or two and then close it out. As a

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-966: Eligible Leader Replicas

Hi Calvin, Thanks for the changes. 1. Earlier I commented that creating "unclean.recovery.strategy " is not necessary, and we can just reuse the existing "unclean.leader.election.enable" configuration key. Let's discuss that. 2.I also don't understand why you didn't add a configuration to

[GitHub] [kafka-site] satishd merged pull request #541: Added 3.6 documentation

satishd merged PR #541: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/541 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-15468) Prevent transaction coordinator reloads on already loaded leaders

Justine Olshan created KAFKA-15468: -- Summary: Prevent transaction coordinator reloads on already loaded leaders Key: KAFKA-15468 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15468 Project: Kafka

[DISCUSS] KIP-979: Allow independently stop KRaft controllers or brokers

Hi all, I would like to start the discussion about *KIP-979: Allow independently stop KRaft controllers or brokers* < https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-979%3A+Allow+independently+stop+KRaft+controllers+or+brokers > It proposes adding an optional field "--process.roles " in the

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.6 #42

See

[GitHub] [kafka-site] satishd opened a new pull request, #541: Added 3.6 documentation

satishd opened a new pull request, #541: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/541 Generated 3.6.0 release docs as mentioned in the [wiki](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Process#ReleaseProcess-Websiteupdateprocess) -- This is an automated message from

Re: Apache Kafka 3.6.0 release

Thanks Justine for the update. I saw in the morning that these changes are pushed to trunk and 3.6. ~Satish. On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 21:54, Justine Olshan wrote: > > Hi Satish, > We were able to merge > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15459 yesterday > and pick to 3.6. > > Hopefully

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-15467) On reconnect mm2 cannot find offset that exists in remote cluster and re-syncs the entire topic

Steve Jacobs created KAFKA-15467: Summary: On reconnect mm2 cannot find offset that exists in remote cluster and re-syncs the entire topic Key: KAFKA-15467 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15467

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-966: Eligible Leader Replicas

Hi Colin Thanks for the comments! I did the following changes 1. Simplified the API spec section to only include the diff. 2. Reordered the HWM requirement section. 3. Removed the URM implementation details to keep the necessary characteristics to perform the unclean

Re: Apache Kafka 3.6.0 release

Hi Satish, We were able to merge https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15459 yesterday and pick to 3.6. Hopefully nothing more from me on this release. Thanks, Justine On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 9:51 PM Satish Duggana wrote: > Thanks Luke for the update. > > ~Satish. > > On Thu, 14 Sept

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #2206

See

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-975 Docker Image for Apache Kafka

Hello, I think this would be a wonderful improvement to the ecosystem. While Viktor is correct that most Docker pipelines eventually lead to a kubernetes deployment, that should not stop us from creating an Official Docker Image. Creating a Docker image would allow us to ensure a level of quality

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-7739) Kafka Tiered Storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Satish Duggana resolved KAFKA-7739. --- Resolution: Fixed > Kafka Tiered Storage > > > Key:

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-15442) add document to introduce tiered storage feature and the usage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Chen resolved KAFKA-15442. --- Resolution: Fixed > add document to introduce tiered storage feature and the usage >

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #2205

See

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-975 Docker Image for Apache Kafka

Hi Viktor, I disagree. Docker is a very popular deployment tool and it's not only used with Kubernetes. Ismael On Thu, Sep 14, 2023, 1:14 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass wrote: > Hi Krishna, > > I think you should merge this KIP and KIP-974 as there are overlaps as > Federico pointed out on KIP-974. I

RE: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support

Hi Divij, Thanks for your response. I have updated the test plan accordingly. Do we have to vote out on the KIP again? We already have 3 +1 binding votes on KIP Thanks, Vaibhav Nazare -Original Message- From: Divij Vaidya Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 11:34 AM To:

Jenkins build is unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #2204

See

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-975 Docker Image for Apache Kafka

Hi Krishna, I think you should merge this KIP and KIP-974 as there are overlaps as Federico pointed out on KIP-974. I think you should keep that one as it has well defined goals (improve tests) while I feel this one is too generic. Docker is usually just a tool for either testing or Kubernetes,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support

+1 (binding) On Wed 26 Jul 2023 at 09:04, Vaibhav Nazare wrote: > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-942 >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support

I don’t have a strong opinion on this. I am fine with running these tests nightly instead of on every merge to trunk. On Wed 13. Sep 2023 at 08:13, Vaibhav Nazare wrote: > Hi Colin, > I do agree with you on running a nightly job. > > Any thoughts on this Mickael and Divij so I can update the