It looks like the KIP has been updated to say that the builds are nighly. With this change I am +1 (binding).
Thanks for working on this, Vaibhav. I believe you can close the vote and mark this KIP as passed, unless anyone else has comments. Maybe give a day or two and then close it out. As a side note: if you have information about what does and does not work on PPC at the moment, maybe consider posting it to the mailing list. It would be interesting to know. best, Colin On Thu, Sep 14, 2023, at 02:14, Vaibhav Nazare wrote: > Hi Divij, > > Thanks for your response. I have updated the test plan accordingly. > > Do we have to vote out on the KIP again? We already have 3 +1 binding > votes on KIP > > Thanks, > Vaibhav Nazare > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Divij Vaidya <divijvaidy...@gmail.com> > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 11:34 AM > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support > > I don’t have a strong opinion on this. I am fine with running these > tests nightly instead of on every merge to trunk. > > On Wed 13. Sep 2023 at 08:13, Vaibhav Nazare <vaibhav.naz...@ibm.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> Hi Colin, >> I do agree with you on running a nightly job. >> >> Any thoughts on this Mickael and Divij so I can update the KIP accordingly? >> >> Thanks >> Vaibhav Nazare >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 3:48 AM >> To: dev@kafka.apache.org >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support >> >> I just disagree with the idea of running it for every commit. If we >> can't compromise on this condition then I just have to cast a -1. It's >> tough enough to get stuff committed since our tests take quite a long >> time. The fact that we only manage 5-6 commits a day is a bad thing, >> and not something we should make even worse. It leads directly to >> things like big PR backlogs, which we've discussed here many times. >> >> best, >> Colin >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023, at 06:50, Vaibhav Nazare wrote: >> > Hi Colin >> > >> > Can we continue the voting process now? >> > >> > Thanks >> > Vaibhav Nazare >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Divij Vaidya <divijvaidy...@gmail.com> >> > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 1:43 PM >> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org >> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP-942: Add Power(ppc64le) support >> > >> > Hey Colin >> > >> > I suggested running tests on every merge to trunk because on an >> > average we have 5-6 commits merged per day in the discuss thread >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/4mfq46fc7nnsr96odqxxhcxyv24d8zn0 . >> > Running this test suite 5 times won't be a burden to the CI >> > infrastructure. The advantage we get is that, unlike nightly builds >> > which have a chance of being ignored, branch builds are actively >> > monitored by folks in the community. Hence, we will be able to add >> > this new suite without adding a new routine in the maintenance. >> > >> > -- >> > Divij Vaidya >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 6:49 PM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> Thank you for continuing to work on this. >> >> >> >> One comment. When we discussed this in the DISCUSS thread, we all >> wanted to run it nightly in branch builder (or possibly weekly). But >> looking at the KIP, it doesn't seem to have been updated with the >> results of these discussions. >> >> >> >> best, >> >> Colin >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023, at 01:37, Mickael Maison wrote: >> >> > +1 (binding) >> >> > Thanks for the KIP! >> >> > >> >> > Mickael >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 1:40 PM Divij Vaidya >> >> > <divijvaidy...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Divij Vaidya >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:04 AM Vaibhav Nazare >> >> >> <vaibhav.naz...@ibm.com.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-942 >>
