Thanks Gwen, Damian,
I will go ahead and merge the corresponding PR then.
Guozhang
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:06 PM Damian Guy wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 at 19:13 Bill
+1
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:06 PM Damian Guy wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 at 19:13 Bill Bejeck wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Matthias J. Sax
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On 12/19/17 9:23
+1
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 at 19:13 Bill Bejeck wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 12/19/17 9:23 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm calling for a re-vote on the additional API
+1
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> +1
>
> On 12/19/17 9:23 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm calling for a re-vote on the additional API changes in this KIP.
> While
> > working on the implementation I found it's better to add the
+1
On 12/19/17 9:23 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm calling for a re-vote on the additional API changes in this KIP. While
> working on the implementation I found it's better to add the following
> functions for programmability:
>
> * Overloaded KafkaStreams constructor to allow
Hello,
I'm calling for a re-vote on the additional API changes in this KIP. While
working on the implementation I found it's better to add the following
functions for programmability:
* Overloaded KafkaStreams constructor to allow overriding the `Time` object.
* Overloaded
+1 from myself as well.
I'm closing this KIP as accepted with 3 binding votes (Gwen, Damian, me)
and 3 non-binding votes (Colin, Ted, Matthias).
Guozhang
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 at 17:52 Gwen Shapira
+1
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 at 17:52 Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1
>
> Make sense. We have a supplier for every other client type :)
>
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 1:33 PM Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 11/17/17 9:35 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
>
+1
Make sense. We have a supplier for every other client type :)
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 1:33 PM Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> +1
>
> On 11/17/17 9:35 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
>
+1
On 11/17/17 9:35 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bill
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Colin McCabe wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> Colin
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 14,
+1
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Colin McCabe wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Colin
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017, at 10:02, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> > > Hello folks,
>
+1
Thanks,
Bill
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Colin McCabe wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Colin
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017, at 10:02, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > I have filed a new KIP on adding AdminClient into Streams for internal
> > topic management.
+1 (non-binding)
Colin
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017, at 10:02, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I have filed a new KIP on adding AdminClient into Streams for internal
> topic management.
>
> Please review and cast your vote on this thread.
>
>
Hello folks,
I have filed a new KIP on adding AdminClient into Streams for internal
topic management.
Please review and cast your vote on this thread.
*https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-220%3A+Add+AdminClient+into+Kafka+Streams%27+ClientSupplier
14 matches
Mail list logo