I agree Matthias. I also see the metadata stored in the value of the topic
status record being extended in the near future to include additional
useful information.
I'm happy to announce that we met our first deadline and that this KIP has
been approved with:
3 binding +1 votes from Randall
Thanks for the KIP.
I am not sure how useful the timestamp and taskId information will be in
practice, but I don't have any concern with regard to
overhead/performance. Hence, as you think it might be useful, I trust
your judgement.
For the timestamp though, I would like to emphasize that I
Thanks for the KIP Konstantine. This will be very useful for Connect.
+1(binding)
-Bill
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 2:12 PM Almog Gavra wrote:
> Another thanks from me! +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:04 AM Randall Hauch wrote:
>
> > Thanks again for the KIP and this improvement
Another thanks from me! +1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:04 AM Randall Hauch wrote:
> Thanks again for the KIP and this improvement for Connect.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Randall
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 10:45 AM Tom Bentley wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP
Thanks again for the KIP and this improvement for Connect.
+1 (binding)
Randall
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 10:45 AM Tom Bentley wrote:
> +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP Konstantine.
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 2:18 AM Konstantine Karantasis <
> konstant...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP Konstantine.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 2:18 AM Konstantine Karantasis <
konstant...@confluent.io> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to open the vote on KIP-558 that had a constructive flurry of
> discussions in the past few days, in order to give this KIP the
Hi all,
I'd like to open the vote on KIP-558 that had a constructive flurry of
discussions in the past few days, in order to give this KIP the opportunity
to be voted on by the current KIP deadline (Wed, Jan 22, 2020), if - of
course - there's agreement upon its final form.
KIP link here:
