Re: pax-web-8: handling security for non-existent resources?

logy is simply "/" with Jolokia's provided security handled by org.jolokia.osgi.security.ServiceAuthenticationHttpContext.handleSecurity(). Can you check Karaf's web:context-list command? regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 16 sie 2022 o 20:03 Robert Varga napisał(a): > Hello, > > while int

Re: Circular feature dependency?

ure - in any version. The fact that Pax Web 8 POM have concrete version of Karaf isn't relevant from features point of view. kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 11 lip 2022 o 16:26 Paul Stanley napisał(a): > Hello, > > Just a quick observation. There appears to be a circular dependency

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.4.1 release

+1 regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 11 lip 2022 o 09:31 fpapon napisał(a): > +1 (binding) > > regards, > > On 10/07/2022 19:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.4.1 release to your vote. > > > > This re

[ANN] Pax Logging 2.0.18 released

: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/milestone/97?closed=1 kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: [ANN] Pax Logging 2.1.3 released

upgrading Pax Exam itself. regards Grzegorz Grzybek > > - Eric L > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 3:18 PM Grzegorz Grzybek > wrote: > > > Hello > > > > I'd like to announce the release of Pax Logging 2.1.3 with just one > update: > > > >-

[ANN] Pax Logging 2.1.3 released

nd regards Grzegorz Grzybek

[ANN] Pax Web 8.0.5 released

truststore is not set with SSL configuration - When using external context.xml configuration for Tomcat, authentication valve is added only once. Full changelog can be found here[1]. kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek === [1]: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/milestone/215?closed=1 >

Re: Karaf 4.4/Pax-Web 8.0.4 Tomcat login valve handling

Hello I didn't spot the change embedded in the move ;) But anyway - thanks for the PR and the improvement! The tests passed and I've merged your PR. Tomorrow I'll release 8.0.5. regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 28 cze 2022 o 15:08 Siano, Stephan napisał(a): > Hi Grzegorz, > > T

Re: Karaf 4.4/Pax-Web 8.0.4 Tomcat login valve handling

a feedback about how easy/hard it is to run the tests :). I plan to release 8.0.5 to be included in Karaf 4.4.1 and we should be ready this week (with Pax Web 8.0.5). thanks for the issue+PR! regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 28 cze 2022 o 14:04 Siano, Stephan napisał(a): > Hi, > > I ha

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.16 release

+1 regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 13 cze 2022 o 14:17 Jamie G. napisał(a): > +1 > > Cheers, > Jamie > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 9:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > >

Re: [UPDATE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.16 and 4.4.1 releases planned next week

Hello I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7449 to upgrade to Pax Web 8.0.4 (with some recent fixes to context processing and "/" WAB fixes) and I'll upgrade today. regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 7 cze 2022 o 05:32 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi guys &g

[ANN] Pax Web 8.0.4 released

affect a context (thanks Gerald Kallas!) - so you can have external security constraints defined in multiple files (and fragments) The runtime versions are: - Jetty 9.4.46.v20220331 - Tomcat 9.0.63 - Undertow 2.2.17.Final Full changelog can be found here[1]. kind regards Grzegorz G

Re: Karaf 4.4.0/Pax-Web 8.0.2 Tomcat context handling

Hello! pon., 30 maj 2022 o 11:26 Siano, Stephan napisał(a): > Hi Grzegorz, > > Thanks a lot, this looks great. I will try to test that as soon as I find > the time for it. > If it's fine, then I'll do a 8.0.4 release. regards Grzegorz Grzybek > > Best regards > S

Re: Karaf 4.4.0/Pax-Web 8.0.2 Tomcat context handling

, but I provide template versions of jetty-web.xml and tomcat-context.xml For example, tomcat-context.xml contains: If you uncomment the valve and "org.ops4j.pax.web.context.file = ${karaf.etc}/tomcat-context.xml" option, the valve rejects request from non local addresses - I hop

Re: Karaf 4.4.0/Pax-Web 8.0.2 Tomcat context handling

> I am willing to contribute to this, but I would prefer to discuss the > correct way to go first. > I've created https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/issues/1721 to track this issue - thanks! And while I've checked, I can immediately fix it ;) kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek > Best regards > Stephan >

Re: The state of Pax Web

ty and performance > —covers REST and Web app servlet functionality. > Great! I'd love to see the results! regards Grzegorz Grzybek > > > Thank you, > > Matt Pavlovich > > > > *From: *op...@googlegroups.com on behalf of > Grzegorz Grzybek > *Date:

[ANN] Pax Web 8.0.3 released

Full changelog can be found here[1]. kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek === [1]: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/milestone/212?closed=1 >

The state of Pax Web

te a GitHub issue at usual place <https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/issues>[2]. kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek === [1]: https://docs.osgi.org/specification/osgi.cmpn/7.0.0/service.http.whiteboard.html#service.http.whiteboard.servletcontext [2]: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/issues

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.4.0 release

+1 Thanks for your work JBO! regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 19 kwi 2022 o 08:24 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi guys, > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.4.0 release to your vote. > This release is a new milestone, starting the 4.4.x series. > > This release includes: &

[ANN] Pax Web 8.0.2 released

y 9.4.46.v20220331 - Tomcat 9.0.62 - Undertow 2.2.17.Final Full changelog can be found here[4]. kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek === [1]: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/main/pax-web-itest/pax-web-itest-container/pax-web-itest-jetty/src/test/java/org/ops4j/pax/web/itest

[ANN] Pax Logging 2.1.2, 2.0.17, 1.12.2 and 1.11.16 released (4 versions)

/milestone/91?closed=1 kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: Apache Karaf board report for March 22

+1 Thanks! regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 1 mar 2022 o 16:41 Matt Pavlovich napisał(a): > +1 looks good. > > I see you have the note about all CVE’s are clear. Maybe add a specific > line item to mention log4shell related issues have been addressed? (Log2j, > reload4j, etc) >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Move PAX projects to Apache Karaf ?

y impossible) TLP Apache project... It'd however conflict (?) too much with Felix and its reference implementations of OSGi specs. kind regards, have a good weekend and prayers for peace Grzegorz Grzybek pt., 25 lut 2022 o 11:39 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Thanks all for your comment.

[ANN] Pax Logging 2.1.1, 2.0.16, 1.12.1 and 1.11.15 released (4 versions)

5?closed=1 - 2.0.16: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/milestone/88?closed=1 - 1.12.1: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/milestone/90?closed=1 - 1.11.15: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/milestone/89?closed=1 kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek ===

[ANN] Pax Web 8.0.1 released

andled Full changelog can be found here[1]. kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek === [1]: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/milestone/201?closed=1 [2]: https://ggrzybek.blogspot.com/2021/11/pax-web-8-whiteboard-services-and-karaf.html

Re: [PROPOSAL] Karaf 5

Hello Great to hear about Karaf5 progress. Do I understand correctly that you think about `K5` branch in apache/karaf repo? If there's no common history, why simply not https://github.com/apache/karaf5 ? regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 7 lut 2022 o 08:25 Francois Papon napisał(a): > Of cou

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Karaf 4.4.0 release

.0 release - what do you think? I was super busy (still am) with log4j CVEs, that's why Pax Web 8.0.1 is not yet ready ;( kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek === [1]: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/milestone/201?closed=1 [2]: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/issues/1664

Pax Logging and recent Log4j1 CVEs (and one note about JMSAppender in Logj42)

os-ch/reload4j What do you think? kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.6 release

+1 (binding) regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 11 sty 2022 o 12:17 Romain Manni-Bucau napisał(a): > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.15 release

Hello I saw the 4.2.15 tag even before your email and I've already checked it with Fuse. +1 (binding) regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 11 sty 2022 o 09:59 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi all, > > I submit Apache Karaf 4.2.15 to your vote. > > This version includes: >

[ANN] Pax Logging 2.0.14, 1.11.13 and 1.10.9 released

- 1.10.9: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/milestone/81?closed=1 kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.5 release

+1 regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 20 gru 2021 o 08:19 Romain Manni-Bucau napisał(a): > +1 > > Le dim. 19 déc. 2021 à 22:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a > écrit : > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.5 to your vote. > > This rel

Re: Logback CVE-2021-42550

Hello Done - I've released Pax Logging 1.11.12 and 2.0.13 with the Logback update. Thanks Matt for the initial PR - I've checked that no other changes are required. regards Grzegorz Grzybek sob., 18 gru 2021 o 05:42 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a): > Thanks, > > However, the PR is no

[ANN] Pax Logging 2.0.13 and 1.11.12 released

: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/milestone/76?closed=1 kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek

[ANN] Pax Logging 1.10.8 released

an exception ;) The changelog is available at GitHub: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/milestone/77?closed=1 kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.4 release (take #3)

+1 (binding) regards Grzegorz Grzybek śr., 15 gru 2021 o 09:44 Achim Nierbeck napisał(a): > +1 (binding) > > regards, Achim > > > Am Mi., 15. Dez. 2021 um 08:34 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > +1 > > > > Romain M

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.4 release (take #3)

Hello With https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/issues/416, Pax Logging 2.0.12 and 1.11.11 already use Log4j2 2.16.0. regards Grzegorz Grzybek śr., 15 gru 2021 o 07:36 Serge Huber napisał(a): > Given that log2j 2.15.0 has been found to have a Denial of service should > we re-r

[ANN] Pax Logging 2.0.12 and 1.11.11 released

for this CVE. The changelog is available at GitHub: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/milestone/74?closed=1 kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.4 release (take #2)

+1 regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 13 gru 2021 o 17:17 Freeman Fang napisał(a): > +1(binding) > > Thanks! > Freeman > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:24 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.4 to

Re: [ANN][CVE-2021-44228] Pax Logging 2.0.11 and 1.11.10 released

@Steven Huypens In order to fix in current installation, you have to change the version in etc/startup.properties and at runtime, do `update mvn:org.ops4j.pax.logging/pax-logging-log4j2/2.0.11` regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 13 gru 2021 o 13:18 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi, >

Re: [ANN][CVE-2021-44228] Pax Logging 2.0.11 and 1.11.10 released

dles won't break your application. It's a way of telling - if you're using our API at given version, we provide compatible interfaces. But the underlying implementation is (for pax logging 2.0.11) is log4j2 2.15.0 (so with the CVE fix). regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 13 gru 2021 o 11:42 Steven Huypen

Re: [ANN][CVE-2021-44228] Pax Logging 2.0.11 and 1.11.10 released

Thanks for sharing the information Bernd! regards Grzegorz Grzybek sob., 11 gru 2021 o 03:25 Bernd Eckenfels napisał(a): > Hello, > > Found no problem was using the wrong property prefix. It works now to turn > it off. > > I also noticed that JNDI lookups will fail on our

Re: [ANN][CVE-2021-44228] Pax Logging 2.0.11 and 1.11.10 released

messages with ${jndi:ldap://example.com }. regards Grzegorz Grzybek pt., 10 gru 2021 o 13:28 Bernd Eckenfels napisał(a): > Hello Grzegorz, > > Thanks a lot for the super quick reaction. > > I was rather confused to see that log messages can trigger a JNDI lookup > anyway. D

[ANN][CVE-2021-44228] Pax Logging 2.0.11 and 1.11.10 released

Hello Pax Logging 2.0.11 and 1.11.10 have been released with CVE-2021-44228 fix. *Log4j2 has been updated to version 2.15.0.* The changelog is available at GitHub: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/milestone/72?closed=1 kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.4 release

│ user │ io.hawt.web.auth.keycloak.KeycloakUserServlet │ /hawtio │ /user/* │ WAB │ - regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 7 gru 2021 o 05:59 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.4 to your vote. > > This release includes dependency upgrad

Re: Preparing Karaf runtime 4.3.4

Hi pon., 15 lis 2021 o 11:05 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi Greg, > > No, it's not related to annotations: it's missing jaspi import in the > web bundle created on the fly by the war extender. > It looks like pax-url-war problem then... regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: Preparing Karaf runtime 4.3.4

ed to jetty 9.4.44 and annotations? Can I help? regards Grzegorz Grzybek > > I’m moving forward as quick as possible to submit Karaf 4.3.4 and > 4.4.0.RC1 to vote. > > Regards > JB > > > Le 12 nov. 2021 à 14:38, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit > : > > > &g

Re: Preparing Karaf runtime 4.3.4

> including fixes that could be interested for any project using the plugin. > What are the changes? :) regards Grzegorz > > Regards > JB > > On 12/11/2021 08:51, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > > Hello > > > > Thanks JBO! > > > > I didn

Re: Preparing Karaf runtime 4.3.4

Hello Thanks JBO! I didn't yet add Pax Web 8 to 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT, but I'm going to do it soon. regards Grzegorz Grzybek pt., 12 lis 2021 o 08:50 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi guys, > > I finally figured to move forward on release preparation. > > I will submit Kara

Re: Preparing Karaf runtime 4.3.4

Grzegorz Grzybek pt., 29 paź 2021 o 13:19 Grzegorz Grzybek napisał(a): > Hi > > pax-web-jetty before Pax Web 8 used jetty-all, which has dependency on > jetty-jaspic, which has dependency on javax.security.auth.message... > > Let me check it. > > regards > Grzegorz Grz

Re: Preparing Karaf runtime 4.3.4

Hi pax-web-jetty before Pax Web 8 used jetty-all, which has dependency on jetty-jaspic, which has dependency on javax.security.auth.message... Let me check it. regards Grzegorz Grzybek pt., 29 paź 2021 o 13:12 Paul Stanley napisał(a): > The Jetty issue: https://github.com/ecli

Re: Preparing Karaf runtime 4.3.4

] The tests include authentication and TLS tests. regards Grzegorz Grzybek pt., 29 paź 2021 o 11:44 Paul Stanley napisał(a): > Hi JB, > > Jetty 9.4.44 now attempts to create the default instance of the jaspi, > even if it is not installed or used. > I've includ

Re: Preparing Karaf runtime 4.3.4

+1 Thanks! regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 12 paź 2021 o 14:43 JB Onofré napisał(a): > Hi guys > > I’m working on Felix FileInstall release fixing the first losing issue. I > will include couple of other important fixes. > > I would like to submit Karaf 4.3.4 to vote during the

Re: Main updated to 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT and karaf-4.3.x branch

Thanks JBO! I'll play with Karaf 4.4 + Pax Web 8 soon. regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 11 paź 2021 o 17:04 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi guys, > > A quick update about this: > > - main branch has been updated to version 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT, R8 > spec/framework and single s

Re: Main updated to 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT and karaf-4.3.x branch

t and also we couldn't observe contexts (context paths) created by Whiteboard and HttpService - like "/" context to which CXF registers it's /cxf servlet for example The above problems are easily fixable in Pax Web 8, just give me some time ;) regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 21 w

Re: Main updated to 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT and karaf-4.3.x branch

rvice.http bundle, but I have no clear opinion yet. regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 21 wrz 2021 o 08:44 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a): > Hi guys, > > I have almost finished the main branch update with: > > - OSGi R8 (Felix Framework 7.0.1) > - remove of OSGi cmpn and use of single

Pax Web 8.0.0 is just one click away

quot; button any time soon and Pax Web 8 will be available in Maven Central. I just hope for a little feedback about the above steps ;) kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.12 release

+1 (I checked the integration tests for Red Hat Fuse 7.x) regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 13 wrz 2021 o 14:50 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.12 to your vote. > > This is a maintenance release on the karaf-4.2.x series,

Plan to release Pax Web 8 + some information

eb-http-tomcat > karaf@root()> feature:install pax-web-war > karaf@root()> bundle:install > 'webbundle:mvn:io.hawt/hawtio-war/2.13.6/war?Web-ContextPath=/hawtio' > Bundle ID: 68 > karaf@root()> start 68 > Then you can log in to http://localhost:8181/hawtio using karaf/karaf credentials (JAAS based authentication) and then navigate to http://localhost:8181/hawtio/jmx/attributes?nid=root-Catalina-WebResourceRoot-localhost-%2FServletContextModel-3-Cache which shows cache configuration for the default (resource) servlet used by /hawtio WAB. kind regards and thanks for the patience ;) Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: Pax Web 8 performance (different JDKs)

Hello JBO Pax Web 8 own "Karaf tests" work (since yesterday) on Karaf 4.3.3. Everything should work on all Osgi Core R6+ runtimes (pax-exam-container-native tests use osgi.core 6.0.0 / Felix 5.6.12) regards Grzegorz Grzybek niedz., 12 wrz 2021 o 21:10 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał

Pax Web 8 performance (different JDKs)

more about "what is Pax Web 8" soon and that the week of Sep 13-17 will be the week of the release. kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Pax Web 8 - WabAugmentingIntegrationTest works

derlying context can be manipulated easily (I hope) using standard OSGi CMPN methods. kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.3 release

+1 regards Grzegorz Grzybek pt., 3 wrz 2021 o 19:52 Francois Papon napisał(a): > +1 (binding) > > Thanks JB! > > regards, > > François > fpa...@apache.org > francois.pa...@openobject.fr > > Le 02/09/2021 à 10:33, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > > Hi

Pax Web 8 - 2 more tasks before GA

, so we can install a WAB and Whiteboard/HttpService alter it by registering for example Preprocessors - Whiteboard DTOs kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek === [1]: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/main/todo.txt [2]: https://github.com/osgi/osgi/

Important Pax Web 8 milestone achieved

was simply taking its getClass() and was using this class (instantiated later by actual runtime). And what's more - even if you register/unregister more WebSockets, single, dedicated SCI is used to (re)register all needed WebSockets! I hope the actual 8.0.0.GA is finally coming. kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek

State of Pax Web 8

Jetty, Tomcat and Undertow containers - only ONE integration test has container specific behavior - the test checking HTTP response when POST size (container-specific configuration) is exceeded. I roughly plan to release Pax Web 8 around mid of September. kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek === [1]: https

Re: June '21 board report

+1 - thanks! regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 1 cze 2021 o 15:05 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a): > Hi guys, > > I prepared the board report for this month: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Board+Reports < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displa

Re: Problem after install pax-trans-tm-narayana with Karaf 4.3.2

Hmm, but your remember this https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.transx/issues/50 issue? I ensured that pax-transx can run, build and test using JDK11... I'll check it again. Could you file a bug to https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.transx/issues ? regards Grzegorz Grzybek czw., 20 maj

Re: Problem after install pax-trans-tm-narayana with Karaf 4.3.2

Hi Did you try `mvn clean install` latest pax-transx release? regards Grzegorz Grzybek czw., 20 maj 2021 o 17:40 Benjamin Graf napisał(a): > Hi JB, > > I use JDK 11 as runtime environment. There is no code to compile to > reproduce this bug just plain Karaf and pax-trans-tm-n

Re: [PROPOSAL] Create karaf-4.3.x branch and update main to 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT

) is moved (partially, the log.stream is now in chapter 158 of cmpn) to OSGi core and the version is bumped from 1.4 to 1.5 - looks like we'll need Pax Logging 2.1.x, but I hope I can make it quick as there are only minor changes. regards Grzegorz Grzybek czw., 20 maj 2021 o 13:51 Francois Papon napisał

Re: Problem after install pax-trans-tm-narayana with Karaf 4.3.2

Hello Mind that https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.transx/issues/50 was fixed recently, but it was about missing import package. regards Grzegorz Grzybek czw., 20 maj 2021 o 10:32 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a): > Hi Ben, > > Are you using JDK 11 (for both compile an

Re: [PROPOSAL] Disable autoRefresh on features service by default and simple optional features service

efactor what I did. > > Thoughts ? > Personally I'm 65% for keeping single features.core + configuration option and 35% for features.simple ;) regards Grzegorz Grzybek > > Regards > JB > > > Le 19 mai 2021 à 08:01, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit > : > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Disable autoRefresh on features service by default and simple optional features service

gt; Another, different, "non-canonical" distribution is fine ;) > > Another possible approach is a configuration in > etc/org.apache.karaf.features.cfg where we use a different/pluggable > deployer. > This can still be done in standard, "canonical" distro, but as com

Re: [PROPOSAL] Disable autoRefresh on features service by default and simple optional features service

're installing. Do you plan to switch to resolverless features service in micro release of Karaf? Or will it be Karaf 4.4 / 5? regards Grzegorz Grzybek > > I will share some details soon. > > Regards > JB > > > Le 12 janv. 2021 à 06:07, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a > écrit

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.2 release

+1 regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 10 maj 2021 o 18:14 Steinar Bang napisał(a): > >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofre : > > > Can you describe your test case ? > > 1. Download the tar.gz of the binary build > 2. Unpack into /tmp/apache-karaf-4.3.2/ > 3. Do &q

[ANN] Pax Transx 0.5.1 released

Hello I'd like to announce the minor release of Pax Transx project with a fix allowing to run pax-transx-tm-narayana on JDK11. The changelog is here: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.transx/milestone/7?closed=1 kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek

[ANN] Pax JDBC 1.5.1 released

Hello I'd like to announce the minor release of Pax JDBC projec with a fix to how Oracle And HSQLDB drivers are handled. The changelog is here: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.jdbc/milestone/27?closed=1 kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.1 release

+1 regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 30 mar 2021 o 21:32 Matt Pavlovich napisał(a): > +1 > > - Downloaded and started unix dist release (no errors, no ‘online’ > artifacts required) > - Added dist repo as a mvn repo > - Installed a few karaf features successfully (scr, etc)

Re: [INFO] Apache Karaf 5 will be internally based on OSGi R8

ng/spring-boot, microprofile, ee, osgi > etc). > I agree. I still believe in "Java applications servers" (whatever the set of standards - real or de-facto - is used). And I still believe in long-running apps. regards Grzegorz Grzybek czw., 25 mar 2021 o 10:33 Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: [INFO] Apache Karaf 5 will be internally based on OSGi R8

Thanks Romain for the details! (see inline) czw., 25 mar 2021 o 08:31 Romain Manni-Bucau napisał(a): > Le jeu. 25 mars 2021 à 07:13, Grzegorz Grzybek a > écrit : > > > Good morning! > > > > śr., 24 mar 2021 o 19:57 Romain Manni-Bucau > > napisał(a): > &

Re: [INFO] Apache Karaf 5 will be internally based on OSGi R8

gt; IMHO. > So clear distinguishing between "applications" and "server plugins" (with e.g., replaceable Jackson as JSON provider) - am I interpreting your statements correctly Romain? regards Grzegorz Grzybek > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter

Re: [INFO] Apache Karaf 5 will be internally based on OSGi R8

Connect specification[2] the inherent part of Karaf5? Is "classpath" generally flat, hierarchical or irrelevant (?) by default? Anyway - the future looks bright ;) regards Grzegorz Grzybek === [1]: https://docs.osgi.org/specification/osgi.core/8.0.0/framework.module.html#framework.module-res

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.11 release

+1 I checked with Fuse-Karaf and everything works regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 9 mar 2021 o 12:56 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a): > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.11 to your vote. > > This release includes bunch of dependency upgrades, fixes, and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.11 release

S... Remember, it can always be solved with (etc/org.apache.karaf.features.xml): http://karaf.apache.org/xmlns/features-processing/v1.0.0;> ... ... regards Grzegorz Grzybek > > I found nothing obviously wrong and we can monkey-patch this > inconsistency downstream. > > +1, non-binding. > > Regards, > Robert > >

Re: Board report March '21

Hello Thanks for the report - Looks good! regards Grzegorz Grzybek pt., 5 mar 2021 o 14:11 Achim Nierbeck napisał(a): > Hi JB, > > Thanks for taking care of this. Looks good to me. > > regards, Achim > > Am Fr., 5. März 2021 um 08:55 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofre

OPS4J projects migration from OPS4J (cloud) Jira to GitHub issues

- ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.vaadin - ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.warp - ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.wicket - ops4j/org.ops4j.ramler - ops4j/org.ops4j.resources - ops4j/org.ops4j.xvisitor - ops4j/pax-repository - ops4j/peaberry Kind regards and I invite you to contribute to OPS4J projects at GitHub ;) Grzegorz Grzybek

Fwd: [ANN] Pax Transx 0.5.0, Pax JMS 1.1.0 and Pax JDBC 1.5.0 released

Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: Migration of OPS4J projects from Jira to Github

uot;, but I've added some checks that allow me to cross reference between already migrated projects. See an example of an issue with links: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.jms/issues/48 kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 9 lut 2021 o 15:51 Matt Pavlovich napisał(a): > Grzegorz- > &g

Re: Coming releases

which (I hope) cleans up the state of `javax.transaction` and `javax.transaction.xa` packages. With the suggested changes (PR links attached) I run successful tests with different JTA scenarios, including DBCP2. There's also a new JtaTest I've added to Karaf. kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek czw

Re: Migration of OPS4J projects from Jira to Github

Hello Thanks to Jürgen Schmid, I was able to set up "ops4j-issues" GitHub account with my current gmail address. I'll continue (if there are no objections) with the migration using this account. kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 9 lut 2021 o 12:51 Grzegorz Grzybek napisał(a): >

Migration of OPS4J projects from Jira to Github

ke Pax Logging or Pax Web, I'd appreciate your feedback. kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: Coming releases

iling list, but didn't get any answer. See https://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40felix.apache.org/msg51498.html kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 9 lut 2021 o 05:55 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a): > Hi everyone, > > Just a quick update about the release schedule: > > - Apache

Re: Transaction APIs...

I've create https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-571 to (hopefully) get some feedback from DBCP2 devs. regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 1 lut 2021 o 17:57 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a): > Hi, > > Thanks for sharing. I will comment in the issue. > > 1. Karaf spec effort

Transaction APIs...

l (it's complete both in JDK 8 and 9+) I invite you to comment under https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.transx/issues/33 if you have any ideas. kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: [PROPOSAL] Disable autoRefresh on features service by default and simple optional features service

narios, where Karaf is used as "application server" and switch it to autoRefresh=false in µservices / custom distro / single start mode. And looking forward Karaf 5 and new feature mechanism, I'd rather turn autoRefresh off in Karaf 5... regards Grzegorz Grzybek pt., 8 sty 2021

Re: Happy Christmas

Too late for Christmas wishes, but I'd like to wish you all happy New Year - the year without face masks, the year of Linux on Desktop™, Karaf 5, Pax Web 8 and Half Life 3 ;) Let us all forget about 2020 asap! kind regards Grzegorz Grzybek czw., 24 gru 2020 o 19:01 Geaaru napisał(a): > Ha

[PAX-WEB 8] Another obstacle - WABs and virtual hosts

Hello I'm progressing well with simplification/stabilization of WAB support in Pax Web 8. Here's a draft schema of how it works now with Pax Web 7 1) Bundles with Web-ContextPath manifest header are "tracked" as "web apps" 2) web.xml parsing (if such descriptor is available) is performed in the

Re: [X-Mas Gift] Panel discussion about Karaf 5

Hello Great idea! I'd be glad to join in reasonable hours ;) And +1 for quick summary of the "state of OSGi". regards Grzegorz Grzybek śr., 16 gru 2020 o 00:43 Bernd Eckenfels napisał(a): > Hello, > > Yes this sounds interesting, would like to listen in. > > BTW i

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Decanter 2.6.0

+1 (binding) regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 15 gru 2020 o 14:39 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a): > +1 (binding) > > Gently reminder about this vote. > > Thanks, > Regards > JB > > > Le 14 déc. 2020 à 06:10, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit > : > > > &g

Re: Coming releases

, so the lifecycle is simplified and matches what I did in pax-web-extender-whiteboard. regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 15 gru 2020 o 14:40 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a): > Hi guys, > > As you have probably seen, Apache Karaf Decanter 2.6.0 is in vote. > > Now, I’m focus on Karaf 4

<    1   2   3   4   5   >