That's whole plan. To go beyond karaf as runtime and let others adopt console
with some other container/server environment.
Best regards,
Łukasz Dywicki
--
Code-House
http://code-house.org
Dnia 20 sie 2012 o godz. 10:16 Ioannis Canellos napisał(a):
> That's interesting.
>
> What are the long
That's interesting.
What are the long term goals here? If the long term vision is to have this
console adopted by other runtimes, that are currently use the felix web
console, then the suggestion no 2 makes a lot of sense.
If we don't have a clean goal set here. I'd say keep a single branch, till
Please keep in mind that Cellar is more specific to Karaf than Web Console is.
People can run Web Console on single node, for development purposes and so on.
I won't say that Cellar is only for Karaf, but it's mostly used with Karaf.
Going further Karaf can be one from platforms supported by Web
+1, for keeping the same versioning as in Cellar
2012/8/17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> It sounds good, I will do that in Cellar if all agrees.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 08/17/2012 06:38 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>
>> I'm with Lukasz on that one; we should keep our releases as simple as
>> possible,
It sounds good, I will do that in Cellar if all agrees.
Regards
JB
On 08/17/2012 06:38 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
I'm with Lukasz on that one; we should keep our releases as simple as
possible, even if this means some more cherry-picking between the
various branches. Independently, after getting
+1 I like the idea Andreas.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Charles Moulliard wrote:
> Keep things simple and adopt same convention as cellar
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>
>> I'm with Lukasz on that one; we should keep our releases as simple as
>> possible, even
Keep things simple and adopt same convention as cellar
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> I'm with Lukasz on that one; we should keep our releases as simple as
> possible, even if this means some more cherry-picking between the
> various branches. Independently, after getti
I'm with Lukasz on that one; we should keep our releases as simple as
possible, even if this means some more cherry-picking between the
various branches. Independently, after getting some good portion of
sleep and some more time to think about this issue I think we should
walk down the same road as
Once again I back with WebConsole topic. As we plan to support bot 2.x and 3.x
line. Current trunk (0.3.0-SNAPSHOT) of webconsole supports 2.x and I am about
to start 3.x branch to get karaf trunk also supported. The problem is that we
can not have the same version for both Karaf versions due ch
