Re: [PROPOSAL] - Dockerhub admins - Must be two persons in the community

2024-05-28 Thread Tiago Bento
+1! On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 12:57 PM ricardo zanini fernandes wrote: > > Folks, I'll add Alex and I since we can add other people or swap if needed. > > Can I get a +1? > > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 10:21 PM ricardo zanini fernandes < > ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Ok, > > > > We still

Re: [PROPOSAL] Abandon PR checks in Jenkins

2024-05-22 Thread Tiago Bento
+1 On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 8:46 AM Pere Fernandez (apache) wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, 22 May 2024 at 14:28, ricardo zanini fernandes < > ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 9:06 AM Yeser Amer wrote: > > > > > + 1 > > > > > > On 2024/05/22 08:00:32 Jan Šťastný

[PROPOSAL] Release manager for Apache KIE (incubator) 10.0.0

2024-05-17 Thread Tiago Bento
of moving things forward, and because he already said he'd be okay acting as Release Manager for Apache KIE 10, I'm here nominating Jan Šťastný (jstastn...@apache.org) for the position! Let us know if you change your mind! :) Regards, Tiago Bento [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues

Re: [HEADS-UP] - Upcoming image tag changes to Docker.io

2024-05-16 Thread Tiago Bento
i-build ... it might as well be enough `main`, `10.0.x`, ... would > >> that make things more aligned? > >> > >> Regards > >> Jan > >> > >> On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 22:39, Tiago Bento wrote: > >> > >> > I think each branch deserves i

Re: [HEADS-UP] - Upcoming image tag changes to Docker.io

2024-05-15 Thread Tiago Bento
ess an important bug or security issue. On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 3:50 PM ricardo zanini fernandes wrote: > > What's gonna be the tag for nightly? :nightly? :) > > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 4:22 PM Tiago Bento > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > One tag for `main`, one

Re: [HEADS-UP] - Upcoming image tag changes to Docker.io

2024-05-15 Thread Tiago Bento
replace > > that, so the things don't get out of hand? > > > > On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 19:11, ricardo zanini fernandes < > > ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Yes, I think we need an email. > > > > > > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at

Re: [HEADS-UP] - Upcoming image tag changes to Docker.io

2024-05-15 Thread Tiago Bento
our assessment and in the worst case we'd hotfix in case of a > > regression. > > > > Regards > > Jan > > > > On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 23:07, Tiago Bento wrote: > > > > > Since we're doing this, maybe we should consider handling the > > > `n

Re: [HEADS-UP] - Upcoming image tag changes to Docker.io

2024-05-14 Thread Tiago Bento
Since we're doing this, maybe we should consider handling the `nightly` publication with a Tag only? The suffix really makes it more difficult to parameterize stuff... On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 4:56 PM ricardo zanini fernandes wrote: > > Thanks Tiago! > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 5

Re: [HEADS-UP] - Upcoming image tag changes to Docker.io

2024-05-14 Thread Tiago Bento
KIE Tools has several images too. I'll update the spreadsheet accordingly. Thanks for putting this together! On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 4:37 PM ricardo zanini fernandes wrote: > > Just one more thing: in short, we will have only the images in the column > "New Image". > > If we agree, I'll then

Re: [PROPOSAL] - Moving CLI and SonataFlow images back to SonataFlow operator's repo

2024-05-10 Thread Tiago Bento
> > > > > > > Hi Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are mixing stuff here Alex. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PR checks are there for guarding that nothing breaks when

Re: [PROPOSAL] - Moving CLI and SonataFlow images back to SonataFlow operator's repo

2024-05-10 Thread Tiago Bento
ild. > 2. some tools cannot produce snapshots but that is a limitation > 3. seems that the painful point is work disruption when us (core > engineers) perform changes that can break tooling > > is that correct ? > > El vie, 10 may 2024 a las 13:32, Tiago Bento > () escribió: &

Re: [PROPOSAL] - Moving CLI and SonataFlow images back to SonataFlow operator's repo

2024-05-10 Thread Tiago Bento
t; > > > El vie, 10 may 2024, 11:55, Alex Porcelli > escribió: > > > > > > > > > Tiago already provided a in-depth explanation of the issue in this > > ML, > > > > > that is summarized in the circular dependency thread [1

[QUESTION] Usage of `kogito-data-index-ephemeral-nightly:latest` during quarkus:dev

2024-05-09 Thread Tiago Bento
Hi everyone, As we're testing publishing the `jbpm` and `sonataflow` Quarkus Dev UIs from `kie-tools`, I'm learning a little bit more of our internals. I'm running `mvn quarkus:dev` at https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-tools/tree/main/examples/drools-process-usertasks-quarkus-example, and

Re: [PROPOSAL] - Moving CLI and SonataFlow images back to SonataFlow operator's repo

2024-05-09 Thread Tiago Bento
ts and using snapshot published > >> timestamps like they are final). > >> > >> Now I think I understand where the problem lies now; so basically if > >> we had the proper graph dependency project built based on proper > >> snapshots everything would buil

Re: [PROPOSAL] - Moving CLI and SonataFlow images back to SonataFlow operator's repo

2024-05-08 Thread Tiago Bento
o highlight that this proposal would > only address a LOCAL problem related exclusively to the SonataFlow > section of the Apache KIE community, while, at the same time, not > contributing to reducing the segmentation of the Apache KIE community > as a whole. > > Yes, the proposal is to start

Re: Circular dep: kn-plugin-workflow -> kogito-swf-builder -> operator -> kn-plugin-workflow introduced by incubator-kie-kogito-images/issues/1739

2024-04-29 Thread Tiago Bento
do so using Zanini's thread about it, if you think that's ok (https://lists.apache.org/thread/lkgql67ks9q2gpkgc8x8d0hn91fzrncl) Regards, Tiago Bento On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:37 AM Enrique Gonzalez Martinez wrote: > > I would argue that making any more changes beyond the ongoin

Re: [HEADS-UP] Unification of maven artifacts deploy procedure

2024-04-25 Thread Tiago Bento
Thanks a lot for jumping on this, Jan! I'm available to help in anything I can! On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 11:26 AM Jan Šťastný wrote: > > Hello, > this is a follow-up on previous discussion thread: [DISCUSS] Maven > artifacts deploy approach > > For the sake of unifying maven artifacts deploy, I'm

Re: [PROPOSAL] - Moving CLI and SonataFlow images back to SonataFlow operator's repo

2024-04-22 Thread Tiago Bento
portant to highlight that this proposal would only address a LOCAL problem related exclusively to the SonataFlow section of the Apache KIE community, while, at the same time, not contributing to reducing the segmentation of the Apache KIE community as a whole. Regards, Tiago Bento On Fri, Apr 19, 202

Re: [PROPOSAL] Upgrade Quarkus to 3.8.4 for KIE 10.0.0 release

2024-04-19 Thread Tiago Bento
+1 On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 4:07 PM ricardo zanini fernandes < ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 thank you! > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 5:00 PM Tibor Zimányi wrote: > > > +1, thank you Alex. > > > > Dňa pi 19. 4. 2024, 21:02 Alex Porcelli > napísal(a): > > > > > I have been exploring the

[PROPOSAL] Renaming Task and Management consoles images

2024-04-17 Thread Tiago Bento
! Tiago Bento - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@kie.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Sonataflow management console

2024-04-02 Thread Tiago Bento
, but understanding a little more about the purpose of each one individually and how they both compose some sort of story would be great to the wider audience. Regards, Tiago Bento On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 2:34 PM Paulo Martins wrote: > The new console creation proposed here is just a new standalone web

Re: [VOTE] Accept Amended Proposal to unblock Apache KIE 10.0.0 Release

2024-03-20 Thread Tiago Bento
+1 On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 9:40 AM Brian Proffitt wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 10:11 AM Alex Porcelli wrote: > > > With all the feedback from the proposal discussion [1], I am starting > > this official vote to accept the amended proposal to unblock Apache > > KIE 10.0.0 Release. >

Re: [HEADS-UP] Summarizing the release process

2024-03-15 Thread Tiago Bento
I'd love it if we could discuss it a little more, as my current understanding of the process slightly differs from the one you shared. Regards, Tiago Bento [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/58xm7pqdyztf7qztmhvntf8wdmvfx7jx On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 10:44 AM Tibor Zimányi wrote: > > Hi

Re: [PROPOSAL] Unblocking and releasing Apache KIE 10

2024-03-14 Thread Tiago Bento
< > > > ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hey Tiago, thanks for the insights, I appreciate it. > > > > > > > > Just one thing regarding building from kie-tools one module that images > > > > need to sync chan

Re: [PROPOSAL] Unblocking and releasing Apache KIE 10

2024-03-13 Thread Tiago Bento
o, > coming from repos not as heterodox, plus changing the repo CI to impose > certain order between these modules or pull out the the operator stuff from > tool repo and put it inside the operator repo plus changing the CI > handling repos to impose the desired order: first tooling and t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Unblocking and releasing Apache KIE 10

2024-03-13 Thread Tiago Bento
e, the need to freeze the rest of the software > > before > > > tools are generated. Why? We have dependencies between repos that are not > > > handled that way: Apps depend on runtimes. Runtimes depend on drools, > > > Operator depend on runtimes,and we are not fre

Re: [PROPOSAL] Unblocking and releasing Apache KIE 10

2024-03-13 Thread Tiago Bento
Apps depend on runtimes. Runtimes depend on drools, > Operator depend on runtimes,and we are not freezing that repos since we > are all releasing at the same time. If we are all releasing at the same > time, what's the rationale behind the freeze? > > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at

Re: [PROPOSAL] Unblocking and releasing Apache KIE 10

2024-03-13 Thread Tiago Bento
t; > > snapshot concept). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, based on our evaluation… the proposal here is the least > > > > > > disruptive > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > >

[PROPOSAL] Unblocking and releasing Apache KIE 10

2024-03-12 Thread Tiago Bento
e problem, considering disruption, required effort, the release process itself, and history. Feel free to propose alternatives. This is not a voting thread. Regards, Tiago Bento - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@kie.apache.org

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Removing the circular dependency between `kogito-apps` and `kie-tools`

2024-03-07 Thread Tiago Bento
feel like we can work in parallel for the remaining tasks, as they're not blocking between each other. Thanks again everyone. We can use the meeting tomorrow to discuss it in more depth if necessary. Regards, Tiago Bento On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 12:43 PM Alex Porcelli wrote: > > Ricardo, Eder and C

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Removing the circular dependency between `kogito-apps` and `kie-tools`

2024-03-06 Thread Tiago Bento
Oops. Ended up mixing the references there. The PR I'm referring to as [1] is https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-images/pull/1734 And the repo list I'm referring to as [1] is https://github.com/orgs/apache/repositories?language==incubator-kie==all

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Removing the circular dependency between `kogito-apps` and `kie-tools`

2024-03-06 Thread Tiago Bento
`kie-tools`. Regards, Tiago Bento [1] https://github.com/orgs/apache/repositories?language==incubator-kie==all On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 9:59 AM Alex Porcelli wrote: > > Ricardo, > > Here's a better description [1] of the dependency that KIE Tools has > with the images. If we have kog

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Removing the circular dependency between `kogito-apps` and `kie-tools`

2024-03-05 Thread Tiago Bento
opinions, though, as I'm not the best person to answer SWF-related questions. Regards, Tiago Bento On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 9:31 AM Dominik Hanak wrote: > > Hi Tiago, > > Thanks for moving this forward. > > I have one thing to highlight with > https://github.com/apache/incubator-

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Removing the circular dependency between `kogito-apps` and `kie-tools`

2024-02-29 Thread Tiago Bento
ce. > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 2:29 AM Tiago Bento wrote: > > > DISCLAIMER: this is a long email. Feel free to jump to the bottom for > > the concrete task list. > > > > --- > > > > This email aims to explain the issue and lay out the efforts that are >

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Removing the circular dependency between `kogito-apps` and `kie-tools`

2024-02-22 Thread Tiago Bento
if you have questions, or simply want to chat about it. Thanks a lot Alex, Paulo, Fabrizio, Thiago, Rodrigo, and others that somehow helped so far. Kind regards, Tiago Bento --- P.S.: You might've noticed we left Trusty out of the picture for now. Thiago is conducting an investigation to understand

Re: BPMN, DMN & Test Scenario Editors for GitHub chrome extension name

2024-01-29 Thread Tiago Bento
"Apache KIE Editors for GitHub" wouldn't be accurate as there is a second Chrome Extensions that provides the SWF Editor. On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 8:38 AM Yeser Amer wrote: > Good point! I'm +1 to rename it. "Apache KIE Editors for GitHub" would be > a good choice, my open to hearing any other

Re: [PROPOSAL] kie-tools CI migration - initial goals

2023-09-21 Thread Tiago Bento
+1 On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 1:22 PM Kris Verlaenen wrote: > +1 > > Thx, > Kris > > Op do 21 sep. 2023 18:04 schreef Alex Porcelli : > > > Some members of the PPMC got together in a call and were able to > > discuss the topic more fluidly... after some evaluations of > > alternatives and