[jira] [Commented] (KNOX-712) submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg()

2016-05-12 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15282368#comment-15282368 ] Hadoop QA commented on KNOX-712: Testing JIRA KNOX-712 Patch [KNOX-712.patch|https://issu

[jira] [Updated] (KNOX-712) submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg()

2016-05-12 Thread Pierre Regazzoni (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre Regazzoni updated KNOX-712: -- Attachment: KNOX-712.patch > submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg() > --

[jira] [Updated] (KNOX-712) submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg()

2016-05-12 Thread Pierre Regazzoni (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre Regazzoni updated KNOX-712: -- Attachment: (was: KNOX-712.patch) > submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg() > ---

[jira] [Commented] (KNOX-712) submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg()

2016-05-12 Thread Pierre Regazzoni (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15282333#comment-15282333 ] Pierre Regazzoni commented on KNOX-712: --- I had re-created patch with --no-prefix since

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning for 0.9.1 Release

2016-05-12 Thread Kevin Minder
+1 on a bug fix 0.9.1 release targeted around June 10th. I agree that it should be tightly scoped and the current candidate list seems like a good starting point. +1 on Larry as the release manager for 0.9.1 also. > On May 12, 2016, at 3:38 PM, larry mccay wrote: > > Let's see what Kevin has i

[jira] [Commented] (KNOX-712) submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg()

2016-05-12 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15281939#comment-15281939 ] Hadoop QA commented on KNOX-712: Testing JIRA KNOX-712 Patch [KNOX-712.patch|https://issu

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning for 0.9.1 Release

2016-05-12 Thread larry mccay
Let's see what Kevin has in mind... On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:49 PM, larry mccay wrote: > Sounds good, Sumit! > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Sumit Gupta > wrote: > >> Thanks for initiating the discussion Larry. +1 for you to be the release >> manager and the date looks good to me as wel

Re: test

2016-05-12 Thread Kevin Minder
Yes, now. > On May 12, 2016, at 3:36 PM, larry mccay wrote: > > now? > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:50 PM, larry mccay wrote: > >> test >>

Re: test

2016-05-12 Thread larry mccay
now? On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:50 PM, larry mccay wrote: > test >

test

2016-05-12 Thread larry mccay
test

[jira] [Updated] (KNOX-712) submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg()

2016-05-12 Thread Pierre Regazzoni (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre Regazzoni updated KNOX-712: -- Attachment: KNOX-712.patch > submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg() > --

[jira] [Updated] (KNOX-712) submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg()

2016-05-12 Thread Pierre Regazzoni (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre Regazzoni updated KNOX-712: -- Attachment: (was: KNOX-712.patch) > submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg() > ---

[DISCUSS] Planning for 0.10.0 Release

2016-05-12 Thread sumit gupta
In light of the recent 0.9.1 planning discuss thread, I thought I would take the opportunity to kick off a discussion about the next release for Knox. The main discussion points I have so far for this release are: 1. Should this release be the 1.0.0 release for Knox? 2. What are the main features

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning for 0.9.1 Release

2016-05-12 Thread larry mccay
Sounds good, Sumit! On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Sumit Gupta wrote: > Thanks for initiating the discussion Larry. +1 for you to be the release > manager and the date looks good to me as well. I agree that this should be > a bug fix release that is tightly scoped. I can¹t think of any other

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning for 0.9.1 Release

2016-05-12 Thread Sumit Gupta
Thanks for initiating the discussion Larry. +1 for you to be the release manager and the date looks good to me as well. I agree that this should be a bug fix release that is tightly scoped. I can¹t think of any other bugs at this time that should be added to the list (other than some docs updates t

[DISCUSS] Planning for 0.9.1 Release

2016-05-12 Thread larry mccay
All - I believe that we need to start collecting and/or filing the JIRAs that we need for a 0.9.1 release. There were a handful of things in 0.9.0 that we were aware of at release time that need to have quick follow up fixes. Currently, we have the following three JIRAs: 1. [image: Bug] KNOX

[jira] [Updated] (KNOX-711) Global Rewrite Rules for a Topology are Problematic

2016-05-12 Thread Larry McCay (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Larry McCay updated KNOX-711: - Fix Version/s: (was: Future) 0.9.1 > Global Rewrite Rules for a Topology are Problema

[jira] [Updated] (KNOX-705) Views in Ambari UI don't render when proxied by the AMBARIUI service

2016-05-12 Thread Larry McCay (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Larry McCay updated KNOX-705: - Fix Version/s: (was: Future) 0.9.1 > Views in Ambari UI don't render when proxied by