Hi,
sophie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another string not integrated : the label for Remove property still
> appears in English when it's in the .sdf file
>
> sfx2 source\dialog\dinfdlg.src 0 imagebutton
> SFX_PB_PROPERTY_REMOVE0 fr -
>
Hi,
I am seeking for latest OpenOffice telugu translations. As i mentioned in my
earlier mail if some one can provide me those translations that would be
great.
And please let me know who are currently working on Telugu translations. I
haven't received any response from the existing language co-or
Really thank you for your support!
Rafaella
On 02/19/09 02:23, Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi,
I have just uploaded MacOSX version of DEV300_m40+localization35 of
INTEL/PPC at good-day.
ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/MacOSX/Dev_DEV300_m40_localization35/
http://ooopackages.good-day
2009.02.19. 11:02 keltezéssel, sophie írta:
here is another one in the main menu Format:
Hi Sophie,
This is the tip of the iceberg, I'm afraid. You can check your French
diff at the following URL:
http://ftp.fsf.hu/OpenOffice.org_hu/devel/loc35-fr.diff.txt
OLD: DEV300_m40 (freshly downloa
Hi Andras,
Andras Timar wrote:
> 2009.02.19. 11:02 keltezéssel, sophie írta:
>>>
>>
>> here is another one in the main menu Format:
>
> Hi Sophie,
>
> This is the tip of the iceberg, I'm afraid. You can check your French
> diff at the following URL:
> http://ftp.fsf.hu/OpenOffice.org_hu/devel/loc
Hi,
looks like big mess happend there on the cws. I will take over the cws
and check all errors tomorrow. I hope most of the issues can be fixed
fast thus I can create new installation sets. Thanks for the detailed
error reports!
Cheers,
Ivo
sophie schrieb:
Hi Andras,
Andras Timar wrote:
Hi!
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99364
Thanks to Yuko for finding that one.
I tell about that one here because all l10n testers might run into this
while testing (or laughing or crying about :-) CWS localization35.
That one was broken in DEV300_m40 already. So the CWS is
dear all
I would like to include telugu language into pootle. I am the
project owner of telugu language. please help me out on this.
bye
bhuvan
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Rafaella Braconi
wrote:
> Hi Tenzin,
>
> On 16/02/09 05:11, Tenzin Dendup wrote:
>>
>> Hi Aijin,
>>
>> I am still
From: Rafaella Braconi
Subject: Re: [l10n-dev] MacOSX INTEL/PPC aqua version of
DEV300_m40+localization35 have been uploaded
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:00:46 +0100
> Really thank you for your support!
>
> Rafaella
My pleasure :)
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , http://ja.openoffice.o
Hi Ivo,
Thank you for working on l10n build.
There were some English messages that were added/changed in DEV300m41.
However, the localization35 was built based on DEV300m40.
so we cannot verify their translated messages in localization35.
For example, the following menus were changed from DEV4
Hi Bhuvan,
Welcome!
Telugu has been added to the integration list:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Pootle_Integration_Roadmap
Can you please confirm if there is any legacy translation of Telugu to
be uploaded to Pootle? If so, please provide me with the translation as
sdf or po forma
DEV300m41 is not for 3.1.0, it is made after branch and is for 3.2.0.
For 3.1.0, after DEV300m40 came OOO310m1.
ain
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 03:15, Yuko Ohsumi wrote:
>
> Hi Ivo,
>
> Thank you for working on l10n build.
>
> There were some English messages that were added/changed in DEV300m41.
>
Hi Ain,
Thank you for the reply.
-> From: Ain Vagula , Date: 02/20/09 02:12 PM :
DEV300m41 is not for 3.1.0, it is made after branch and is for 3.2.0.
For 3.1.0, after DEV300m40 came OOO310m1.
It is my mistake. I will update the test cases in TCM.
Thanks,
Yuko
ain
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at
Anyways, this Object - Drawing Object exists also in m1 and I'm pretty
sure that this came from m40 or earlier, because m40 -> m41 there was
no diff in strings.
ain
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 07:43, Yuko Ohsumi wrote:
>
> Hi Ain,
>
> Thank you for the reply.
>
> -> From: Ain Vagula , Date: 02/20/09
and more... you should avoid updating at this moment, because there is
CWS pending for m2 that reverts string changes in dbaccess module,
accidentally happened in m1.
ain
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 07:43, Yuko Ohsumi wrote:
>
> Hi Ain,
>
> Thank you for the reply.
>
> -> From: Ain Vagula , Date: 02
-> From: Ain Vagula , Date: 02/20/09 02:49 PM :
and more... you should avoid updating at this moment, because there is
CWS pending for m2 that reverts string changes in dbaccess module,
accidentally happened in m1.
Thank you. Yes, I will keep the current test cases until we test the next CWS
16 matches
Mail list logo
