Guten Tag Stephen Webb,
am Dienstag, 3. März 2020 um 06:51 schrieben Sie:
> As a result of knowing the macros are "blocks", most LOG4CXX_ XXX() code
> does not have a trailing semicolon.
And that has been unexpacted behaviour in the past and users did
wrong, so has been changed. The current imple
Hello,
Given I am done with my JsonTemplateLayout PR and waiting for the
review (I am looking at you Ralph), I have started working on removing
Jackson dependency. This would allow the layout to be included in the
core. A major obstacle I encounter is the implementation of the
following two config
Hi All (I'm back from vacation today):
For 3.0, my thoughts are that the 'core' should only include infrastructure
used to implement actual appenders and layouts (and filters and so on.)
My experience with the products that use Log4j 1 and 2 at work is:
- Use the Console appender by default.
- No
The new config code is all extremely modular. I put it all in the plugins
module for now, but it can certainly end up as a stand-alone module. FWIW,
I’d love to go with this idea as I’ve wanted something like it since I
started working on OSGi integration long ago.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 07:52 Gar
Considering we’re on track to log4j 3.0 this year, that could certainly
make for a talk on its own. Based on the various tracks available this
year, is anyone planning to submit a talk or have any suggestions on topics
they’d like to see?
--
Matt Sicker
While this feedback is not directly related with my question, I have
the impression that you anticipate JsonTemplateLayout to get released
with 3.X. If so, that is sort of bad news for me, since I wanted to
have it earlier in a 2.X release. Would you mind elaborating on this,
please?
On Tue, Mar 3
Well that looks like a Maven stacktrace with that sisu library usage.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 01:38 Apache Jenkins Server <
jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote:
> See <
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Log4j%202%203.x/557/display/redirect?page=changes
> >
>
> Changes:
>
> [rgoers] LOG4J2-2779 - Add Co
I think that’s more related to where everything will go in 3.x. There’s no
reason we can’t include this in 2.x. Being dependency free qualifies it for
core in 2.x at least.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 08:24 Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> While this feedback is not directly related with my question, I have
>
To be clearer (sorry I was not before), I think we are going to the
direction of NOT trying to stuff MORE stuff in the core module, whether
that's in 2.x or 3.x. My preference would be to include this kind of new
features in new modules so that folks get used to what will hopefully be
the norm in 3
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 04:51:28PM +1100, Stephen Webb wrote:
> I would be surprised if any unix distribution would change to 0.11 log4cxx
> if its API is incompatible with 0.10.
With my Debian maintainer hat on:
This is nothing special and day to day businesss with distos:
It will "just" invok
Moved to a separate topic since none of this has much to do with the questions
that were asked.
> On Mar 3, 2020, at 6:52 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All (I'm back from vacation today):
>
> For 3.0, my thoughts are that the 'core' should only include infrastructure
> used to implement actu
> On Mar 3, 2020, at 2:12 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Given I am done with my JsonTemplateLayout PR and waiting for the
> review (I am looking at you Ralph),
I promise I will get to this very soon.
> I have started working on removing
> Jackson dependency. This would allow the l
I'd like to keep log4j-core dependency-free (other than log4j-api of
course), so any plugins that only require java.base seem fine to
include in core. We'll likely need some optional dependencies for
asynchronous logging and such, but simplifying the dependencies here
would be great.
On Tue, 3 Mar
A different POV I have lately is playing around with a Raspberry Pi, which
is a touch more resource constrained than a Windows or Linux box. I am also
working on an Arduino project but I can't run Java there.
Gary
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020, 11:37 Ralph Goers wrote:
> Moved to a separate topic since n
14 matches
Mail list logo