Hi all
With +3 binding votes (Christian, Volkan and myself), apache log4net
2.0.17 is released and available:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rel%2F2.0.17
Source snapshot at:
https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net/source/apache-log4net-source-2.0.17.zip
+1
Checked only formalities since I don't have an idea about .NET, but so far,
looks good!
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024, at 11:07, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> +1
>
> Checked sigs, hashes, `LICENSE` files, and release notes.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:29 PM Davyd McColl wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
+1
Checked sigs, hashes, `LICENSE` files, and release notes.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:29 PM Davyd McColl wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4net 2.0.17.
>
> Website:
> https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/release/release-notes.html
> GitHub:
Ah, ok, then I'll abstain from voting until we have a version I can
build locally.
TY for the heads up.
Gary
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 2:24 PM Jan Friedrich wrote:
>
> Hello Gary,
>
> https://paste.apache.org/1ropz looks like you're building 2.0.16?
> Building the current version is currently
Hello Gary,
https://paste.apache.org/1ropz looks like you're building 2.0.16?
Building the current version is currently very difficult due to the many target
frameworks: net20;net35;net40;net40-client;net45;netstandard1.3;netstandard2.0
You need to have each SDK for them and especially the old
What about the failure?
Gary
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024, 11:35 AM Davyd McColl wrote:
> Hi
>
> Yes, everything should be done via npm scripts. So I should remove any
> confusing .cmd files.
>
> As for the version, I should update that, but it's minor. That version
> comes from package.json and will
Hi
Yes, everything should be done via npm scripts. So I should remove any
confusing .cmd files.
As for the version, I should update that, but it's minor. That version
comes from package.json and will only show when running npm commands. But I
admit it's confusing.
-d
On 15 March 2024
We might need better build instructions... for me at least ;-)
I take it the build.cmd file should be removed since it's not mentioned in
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/blob/master/doc/BUILDING.md ?
BUILDING.md contains a section called "TL;DR (!Windows):" which is too easy to
I think this is perfectly valid, he only shared the GitHub view to the
`rel/2.0.17-rc1` tag – which is immutable due to `rel/`-prefix. He
could have maybe explicitly stated it, but not a biggie, IMHO. If you
don't like the GitHub view, you can clone the repository locally and
checkout the tag
Hi and thank you for RM'ing this release.
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rel/2.0.17-rc1
This is no good IMO, you should provide an _apache_ link.
Gary
On 2024/03/15 12:28:03 Davyd McColl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4net 2.0.17.
>
>
Hi all,
This is a vote to release the Apache Log4net 2.0.17.
Website:
https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/release/release-notes.html
GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net
GitHub release (pre-release):
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rel/2.0.17-rc1
11 matches
Mail list logo
