Re: Staging website (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.21.0)

2023-10-23 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hi On Mon, Oct 23, 2023, at 11:01, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > Staging website has been broken since October 10, that is, the last two > weeks – please, correct me if I'm wrong. I support Christian's Jekyll > migration and I know he is blocked by INFRA. I have created the issue only 5 days ago, after

Re: Staging website (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.21.0)

2023-10-23 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
Staging website has been broken since October 10, that is, the last two weeks – please, correct me if I'm wrong. I support Christian's Jekyll migration and I know he is blocked by INFRA. 1. Do we have a deadline to consider alternative courses of action? 2. Can we implement your Jekyll goal

Re: Staging website (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.21.0)

2023-10-18 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Stephen, On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 07:36, Stephen Webb wrote: > > Hi Piotr, > > The Log4cxx staging website URL > https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4cxx/latest_stable/usage-overview.html > now reports a 404. > > The .asf.yaml contains: > > staging: > profile: ~ > whoami: asf-staging >

Re: Staging website (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.21.0)

2023-10-17 Thread Stephen Webb
Hi Piotr, The Log4cxx staging website URL https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4cxx/latest_stable/usage-overview.html now reports a 404. The .asf.yaml contains: staging: profile: ~ whoami: asf-staging subdir: content/log4cxx Do you have a suggestion as to where I can find it now?

Re: Staging website (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.21.0)

2023-10-13 Thread Ralph Goers
Nevermind. I was using the wrong url. Ralph > On Oct 13, 2023, at 8:21 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > I get a 404 trying to access the log4j2 staging web site. Although > technically not required for a release I am not comfortable voting for the > release without being able to see the web site.

Re: Staging website (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.21.0)

2023-10-13 Thread Ralph Goers
I get a 404 trying to access the log4j2 staging web site. Although technically not required for a release I am not comfortable voting for the release without being able to see the web site. Ralph > On Oct 13, 2023, at 6:46 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > On Fri, 13 Oct

Re: Staging website (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.21.0)

2023-10-13 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Christian, On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 13:46, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Why is content not causing this issue? > For me both is possible, just trying to understand the best way. >From what I understand, if a branch (in any repo) has a configuration: staging: whoami: name_of_the_branch

Staging website (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.21.0)

2023-10-13 Thread Christian Grobmeier
>> [1] Christian's recent Jekyll experiment on the `asf-staging` branch >> of `logging-site` repository confused the INFRA and it is acting >> strangely. This will *NOT* be an issue when we push the website >> changes to production, i.e., `asf-site` branch. Though we will try >> fixing