[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913428#action_12913428 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2649: --- Hi Ryan, few comments: - the tests if all/

Re: discussion about release frequency.

From a users perspective, I would say that each one of FieldCollapse, AutoSuggest and SpatialSearch would justify a minor release (once stable). -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com On 22. sep. 2010, at 03.05, Robert Muir wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2657) Auto-generate POM templates from Ant builds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913445#action_12913445 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2657: bq. I don't see this issue as providing a complet

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2657) Auto-generate POM templates from Ant builds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913450#action_12913450 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2657: I should add that I'm currently looking at how an

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2658) TestIndexWriterExceptions random failure: AIOOBE in ByteBlockPool.allocSlice

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2658. Fix Version/s: 3.1 4.0 Resolution: Fixed > TestIndexWrit

[jira] Created: (SOLR-2130) Empty index directory causes FileNotFoundException error when starting in-memory SOLR server (RAMDirectory)

Empty index directory causes FileNotFoundException error when starting in-memory SOLR server (RAMDirectory) --- Key: SOLR-2130 URL: https://issues.apache.org/j

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913485#action_12913485 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2649: bq. Also set the Lucene default t

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2125) Spatial filter is not accurate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913493#action_12913493 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2125: --- Couple of things: 1. I did find some other e

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913503#action_12913503 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2649: - bq. Also set the Lucene default to true, as I w

Re: [VOTE] rename -dev.jar files to -SNAPSHOT.jar for better maven support

[X] Rename 3.x and 4.x to -SNAPSHOT.jar I don't much care about the name of the unreleased jar files. But note: i still think there are verification steps we should take before automatically pushing even snapshots to the apache repository... On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:

Re: [VOTE] rename -dev.jar files to -SNAPSHOT.jar for better maven support

On Sep 21, 2010, at 8:53 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: > > [x ] Rename 3.x and 4.x to -SNAPSHOT.jar We make no guarantees about snapshot builds anyway. They are not official releases and are for developer convenience. -Grant

Re: discussion about release frequency.

On Sep 20, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > > I'm not buying the authoritative argument, it seems like any old joker can > take our signed jars and put them in maven themselves, without us having to > do any work. No, they can't. They can put them in their own repo, but they can't put t

Re: [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (SOLR-2125) Spatial filter is not accurate

On Sep 21, 2010, at 11:58 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > >> Bill Bell edited comment on SOLR-2125 at 9/21/10 11:47 PM: > > , it generates an email to the d...@lucene.a.o list, so > we're getting an an avalanche of email here. > What's a few extra snowflakes in the midst of a blizzard, anyway, M

Re: [VOTE] rename -dev.jar files to -SNAPSHOT.jar for better maven support

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > We make no guarantees about snapshot builds anyway. They are not official > releases and are for developer convenience. > > exactly, they should be for *our* convenience. Therefore, the same verification step that runs before actual rele

Re: [Lucene-java Wiki] Trivial Update of "ReleaseTodo" by YonikSeeley

On Sep 20, 2010, at 4:31 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> On Sep 20, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: >>> I am also re-asserting (as I have asserted in the past) that the Maven >>> artifacts are *optional*. >>> We've discussed maven not be

Re: [VOTE] rename -dev.jar files to -SNAPSHOT.jar for better maven support

[x ] Rename 3.x and 4.x to -SNAPSHOT.jar On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Grant Ingersoll > wrote: >> >> We make no guarantees about snapshot builds anyway.  They are not official >> releases and are for developer convenience. > > exactl

Re: discussion about release frequency.

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > At the end of the day, I don't see what the big deal is. For those of us > who want Maven, we need to step up and make it work seamlessly. Why should > you care if we do that? Given it gets fixed, it won't effect you. I > understand y

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2268) Add test to check maven artifacts and their poms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913517#action_12913517 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2268: Hi Robert, Have you mentioned somewhere recently

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2268) Add test to check maven artifacts and their poms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913519#action_12913519 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2268: - Chris, these sound like great checks... I'm no

Re: discussion about release frequency.

On Sep 22, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > At the end of the day, I don't see what the big deal is. For those of us who > want Maven, we need to step up and make it work seamlessly. Why should you > care if we do that?

Re: discussion about release frequency.

> I get your reasoning, but unfortunately, because you don't understand how > Maven works you don't realize why maintaining it downstream is not an option. > Sorry. > Seems very doable to me. A couple dudes get together and become the authority for Lucene/Solr Maven themselves. Apply to Maven

Re: discussion about release frequency.

On Sep 22, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > >> I get your reasoning, but unfortunately, because you don't understand how >> Maven works you don't realize why maintaining it downstream is not an >> option. Sorry. >> > > Seems very doable to me. A couple dudes get together and become th

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2268) Add test to check maven artifacts and their poms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913529#action_12913529 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2268: Much of these are handled by Maven itself: bq. P

Re: discussion about release frequency.

On 9/22/10 9:00 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > On Sep 22, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > >> >>> I get your reasoning, but unfortunately, because you don't understand how >>> Maven works you don't realize why maintaining it downstream is not an >>> option. Sorry. >>> >> >> Seems very do

Re: discussion about release frequency.

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > Does an Indic Analyzer have to be part of the release? I have no need for > it and it is optional for a lot (likely most) of people. It's a pain for me > as I have no way of knowing that it is really working b/c I don't speak the > lang

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2268) Add test to check maven artifacts and their poms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913534#action_12913534 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2268: - Chris: to get better bang for our buck, one way

Welcome Steven Rowe as Lucene/Solr committer!

I'm pleased to announce that the PMC has accepted Steven Rowe as Lucene/Solr committer! Welcome Steven! -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com

Re: discussion about release frequency.

On Sep 22, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > On 9/22/10 9:00 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> >> On Sep 22, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Mark Miller wrote: >> >>> I get your reasoning, but unfortunately, because you don't understand how Maven works you don't realize why maintaining it downst

Re: Welcome Steven Rowe as Lucene/Solr committer!

+1 On Sep 22, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > I'm pleased to announce that the PMC has accepted Steven Rowe as Lucene/Solr > committer! > > Welcome Steven! > > -- > Robert Muir > rcm...@gmail.com - To unsubscribe, e-

Re: discussion about release frequency.

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > We've been providing Maven releases since 2005.  That's Lucene 1.2!   > That's pretty much longer than everyone here has been a committer other than > Hatcher and Otis.  So, yeah, I do think it is removing a pretty big feature. I

Re: [Lucene-java Wiki] Trivial Update of "ReleaseTodo" by YonikSeeley

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > Likewise: If i feel like releases should always include a picture of a > monkey holding the New York times on the day the release is made, then i > should contribute a patch that causes the build to generate a picture of a > monkey holdin

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2125) Spatial filter is not accurate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913567#action_12913567 ] Bill Bell commented on SOLR-2125: - Grant: Did you see my patch? It appears to work pretty we

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2125) Spatial filter is not accurate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913572#action_12913572 ] Bill Bell commented on SOLR-2125: - Another reference: I like the pointInPolygon() idea from

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-2125) Spatial filter is not accurate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-2125: -- Attachment: SOLR-2125.patch Here's a patch that puts in the east/west, north/south bounding box,

Re: Welcome Steven Rowe as Lucene/Solr committer!

Yaaa Steven! On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > I'm pleased to announce that the PMC has accepted Steven Rowe > as Lucene/Solr committer! > > Welcome Steven! > > -- > Robert Muir > rcm...@gmail.com >

Re: Welcome Steven Rowe as Lucene/Solr committer!

Welcome Steven!! Mike On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > I'm pleased to announce that the PMC has accepted Steven Rowe as Lucene/Solr > committer! > Welcome Steven! > -- > Robert Muir > rcm...@gmail.com > - T

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2657) Replace Maven POM templates with full POMs, and change documentation accordingly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-2657: Summary: Replace Maven POM templates with full POMs, and change documentation accordingly (wa

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2125) Spatial filter is not accurate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913577#action_12913577 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2125: --- Hi Bill, Sorry, yeah, I did see your patch,

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2268) Add test to check maven artifacts and their poms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913581#action_12913581 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2268: Hi, So far I've just gathered some anecdotal in

Re: svn commit: r1000000 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/solr: ./ src/java/org/apache/solr/search/ src/test/org/apache/solr/search/ src/test/org/apache/solr/search/function/

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:48 AM, wrote: > Author: yonik > Date: Wed Sep 22 14:48:10 2010 > New Revision: 100 > nice timing :) -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2662) BytesHash

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913589#action_12913589 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2662: -- The current hash implementation needs

[jira] Resolved: (SOLR-2128) full parameter dereferencing for function queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-2128. Resolution: Fixed committed. > full parameter dereferencing for function queries >

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2575) Concurrent byte and int block implementations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913597#action_12913597 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2575: -- The reference counting described abov

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2662) BytesHash

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913599#action_12913599 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2662: - Jason: I am confused... there is no hash impl i

RE: svn commit: r1000000 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/solr: ./ src/java/org/apache/solr/search/ src/test/org/apache/solr/search/ src/test/org/apache/solr/search/function/

Heavy Committing rules! - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 7:49 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: svn

Congratulations Yonik

On nabbing the 1,000,000th commit at Apache! And there were a lot of people watching to see who got it! Upayavira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apa

Re: Welcome Steven Rowe as Lucene/Solr committer!

Congratulations! On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > I'm pleased to announce that the PMC has accepted Steven Rowe > as Lucene/Solr committer! > > Welcome Steven! > > -- > Robert Muir > rcm...@gmail.com >

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-236) Field collapsing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913618#action_12913618 ] Jamie commented on SOLR-236: When using collapse.includeCollapsedDocs.fl to and sorting by a fiel

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2662) BytesHash

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913622#action_12913622 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2662: -- The THPF is hashing tokens for use in

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ryan McKinley updated LUCENE-2649: -- Attachment: LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch Here is a new patch that removes the static

Re: Congratulations Yonik

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Upayavira wrote: > On nabbing the 1,000,000th commit at Apache! Thanks! > And there were a lot of people watching to see who got it! Whew, good thing it wasn't something totally lame ;-) -Yonik http://lucenerevolution.org Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-

RE: Welcome Steven Rowe as Lucene/Solr committer!

Thanks! I’m proud and humbled to be given this honor. About me (in the tradition of new committers introducing themselves on the mailing list): For the last 8 years, I've worked at the Center for Natural Language Processing (CNLP) at the iSchool (a.k.a. School of Information Studies) at Syracu

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2662) BytesHash

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913628#action_12913628 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2662: - Jason: what I am saying is if i look at the met

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2662) BytesHash

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913632#action_12913632 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2662: -- Ah, ok, I didn't write this code, I e

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913633#action_12913633 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649: -- If folks think that being able to tell a real

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2662) BytesHash

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913636#action_12913636 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2662: - jason, can you please hold off with thi

Re: Document links

Some inital thoughts on the challenges in maintaining docid->docid links: https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AsKVSn5SGg_wdHhMUW9ya0xxUFI3VXBHZGZHVUo4RkE&hl=en&authkey=CLOmwrgL#gid=0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2662) BytesHash

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913638#action_12913638 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2662: -- Simon, when do you think you'll be po

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2128) full parameter dereferencing for function queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913640#action_12913640 ] Jeremy Thomerson commented on SOLR-2128: yeah - committed with r100! https://bl

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2662) BytesHash

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913642#action_12913642 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2662: - bq. Simon, when do you think you'll be

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913646#action_12913646 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2649: bq. I think this is a better opt

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913647#action_12913647 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2649: bq. My motivation is for supporti

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2662) BytesHash

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913651#action_12913651 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2662: -- It'd be nice to get deletes working,

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913659#action_12913659 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2649: --- I am also strongly +1 for the additional Bi

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-2010) Improvements to SpellCheckComponent Collate functionality

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Dyer updated SOLR-2010: - Attachment: SOLR-2010_141.patch This version is for v1.4.1. No shard support as SpellCheckComponent does

Re: Congratulations Yonik

On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 11:40 -0400, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Upayavira wrote: > > On nabbing the 1,000,000th commit at Apache! > > Thanks! > > > And there were a lot of people watching to see who got it! > > Whew, good thing it wasn't something totally lame ;-) L

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913672#action_12913672 ] Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649: --- bq. Hmm... I'd rather make an exception to

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913675#action_12913675 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2649: --- bq. Hmm... I'd rather make an exception to

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913677#action_12913677 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649: -- Regardless of if there is a separate getBits(

solr-...@lucene.apache.org

Should we close down that list now? Seems there is still the occasional email that goes there, but they are rarely answered. Would it be better if we shut it down and bounced messages there so that people came here instead? -Grant ---

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913679#action_12913679 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2649: bq. Regardless of if there is a s

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913680#action_12913680 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2649: bq. So how about we add a getBit

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913685#action_12913685 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2649: bq. That is OK with me. Would be

Re: solr-...@lucene.apache.org

: Subject: solr-...@lucene.apache.org : : Should we close down that list now? Seems there is still the occasional : email that goes there, but they are rarely answered. Would it be better : if we shut it down and bounced messages there so that people came here : instead? I don't udnerstand

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913688#action_12913688 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2649: --- We should also allow the parser to stop ite

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2080) Create a Related Search Component

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913690#action_12913690 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2080: --- It occurs to me that what we have evolving he

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913695#action_12913695 ] Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649: --- bq. Regardless of if there is a separate ge

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913698#action_12913698 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2649: bq. If we have a separate getBits

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913699#action_12913699 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2649: --- I think it should be a separate entry in th

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913700#action_12913700 ] Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649: --- bq. If we do this then we can leave cutover

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913701#action_12913701 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649: -- bq. If we have a separate getBits( field ) c

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913699#action_12913699 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2649 at 9/22/10 2:25 PM:

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913703#action_12913703 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649: -- bq. I all cases this is easily possible by ha

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913709#action_12913709 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2649: --- It's not more complicated its easier. The B

Local Params syntax not protecting Shingles in DisMax from Lucene query parser

Background: I've been interested in some specific 3 word shingles. The idea is that, although we throw out stop words like "the", "how", "it", etc, that some 3 word runs that contains those words are actually potentially useful, related to my "Power Law" email a few days back. BTW there's a paper

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913710#action_12913710 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2649: bq. What's the issue with just pu

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913712#action_12913712 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649: -- bq. But we could probably still achieve these

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913712#action_12913712 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on LUCENE-2649 at 9/22/10 2:46 PM: -

Re: solr-...@lucene.apache.org

On Sep 22, 2010, at 1:50 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : Subject: solr-...@lucene.apache.org > : > : Should we close down that list now? Seems there is still the occasional > : email that goes there, but they are rarely answered. Would it be better > : if we shut it down and bounced messag

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913734#action_12913734 ] Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649: --- bq. more performant too (and avoid more syn

Re: Welcome Steven Rowe as Lucene/Solr committer!

Congratulations Steve! On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote: > Thanks!  I’m proud and humbled to be given this honor. > > About me (in the tradition of new committers introducing themselves on the > mailing list): > > For the last 8 years, I've worked at the Center for Natural L

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913740#action_12913740 ] J.J. Larrea commented on LUCENE-2649: - I only just waded through this thread, so apolo

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913742#action_12913742 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649: -- bq. The only cost would be iterating the Term

Constellio Enterprise Search announces its first Open Source release

The Constellio team is proud to announce the release of the first Open Source version of Constellio Enterprise Search. It is available for download at the following address : http://www.constellio.com Based on Apache Solr and using Google Search Appliance's connector architecture, Constellio prov

Re: [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (SOLR-2125) Spatial filter is not accurate

Got it. Thanks Bill Bell Sent from mobile On Sep 22, 2010, at 6:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > On Sep 21, 2010, at 11:58 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > >> >>> Bill Bell edited comment on SOLR-2125 at 9/21/10 11:47 PM: >> >> , it generates an email to the d...@lucene.a.o list, so >> we're

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-2662) BytesHash

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-2662: --- Assignee: Simon Willnauer > BytesHash > - > > Key: LUCENE-26

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2662) BytesHash

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2662: Fix Version/s: 4.0 Affects Version/s: 4.0 > BytesHash > - > >

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913795#action_12913795 ] J.J. Larrea commented on LUCENE-2649: - {quote} Actually, that's major - otherwise I wo

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913857#action_12913857 ] Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649: --- bq Is the one-time-per-IndexReader-lifecycl

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2010) Improvements to SpellCheckComponent Collate functionality

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913858#action_12913858 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2010: --- I haven't forgotten about this, James. I app

  1   2   >