Solr-3.x - Build # 184 - Failure

Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-3.x/184/ All tests passed Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 18941 lines...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-ma

Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 2078 - Failure

Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/2078/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch.testDistribSearch Error Message: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions! Stack Trace: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Some threads threw uncaugh

DataImportHandlerException when cache key is null in SOLR 1.4.1

Hello, I am using CachedSqlEntityProcessor for one of my entities and it working fine when I am loading the cache as keys are requested, however it doesn't work when I try to pre load the cache. My configuration for "loading the cache as keys are requested" is: When I change it to the following

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1143) Return partial results when a connection to a shard is refused

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965913#action_12965913 ] Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-1143: I tried this patch, then we put SOLR-1537 into prod

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1143) Return partial results when a connection to a shard is refused

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965891#action_12965891 ] Gary Yngve commented on SOLR-1143: -- This issue has been superceded by https://issues.apach

Re: Document aware analyzers was Re: deprecating Versions

I agree with Robert that minimizing analysis <-> indexer interface is the way to go. For me, one of Lucene's problems is that it wants to do too much stuff out of the box, and is tightly coupled, so you can't drop much of the things you never need. Having minimal interface for the indexer allows u

Re: Document aware analyzers was Re: deprecating Versions

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> Well i have trouble with a few of your examples: "want to use >> Tee/Sink" doesn't work for me... its a description of an XY problem to >> me... i've never needed to use it, and its rarely discussed on the >> user list... > > Shrugs.  In m

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1709) Distributed Date Faceting

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965841#action_12965841 ] Peter Karich commented on SOLR-1709: Hi Peter, sorry for getting so late back. I'm rel

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2788) Make CharFilter reusable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2788: Attachment: LUCENE-2788.patch here's a very quick patch (all tests pass): * Changed CharFilter to

Re: Document aware analyzers was Re: deprecating Versions

On Dec 1, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> >> Nah, I just meant analysis would often benefit from having knowledge of the >> document as a whole instead of just the individual field. >> > > and analysis would suffer from this to

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2788) Make CharFilter reusable

Make CharFilter reusable Key: LUCENE-2788 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2788 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: Analysis Reporter: Robert Muir

Re: levaing from this group ???

To remove your address from the list, send a message to: On Dec 1, 2010, at 2:40 PM, asmcad wrote: > how can i leave this group? i couldn't find the site. > > thanks Wade Girard wade.gir...@gmail.com

Re: Document aware analyzers was Re: deprecating Versions

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > Nah, I just meant analysis would often benefit from having knowledge of the > document as a whole instead of just the individual field. > and analysis would suffer from this too, because right now these things are independent and we have

Re: levaing from this group ???

how can i leave this group? i couldn't find the site. thanks

Re: Document aware analyzers was Re: deprecating Versions

On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > >> While we are at it, how about we make the Analysis process document aware >> instead of Field aware? The PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper, while doing exactly >> what it says it does, is just

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2787) disable atime for DirectIOLinuxDirectory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965752#action_12965752 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2787: - after all i think we should really do i

Re: Changes Mess

So, going forward... When committing an issue that needs a changes entry, where are we supposed to put it? EG if it's a bug fix that we'll backport all the way to 2.9.x... where does it go? If it's a new feature/API that's going to 3.x and trunk... only in 3.x's CHANGES? Mike On Wed, Dec 1, 20

[jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-384) QueryParsers exception on Windows 2008 Server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965741#action_12965741 ] Hans commented on LUCENENET-384: You'll have to get the sources from SVN and compile you

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2787) disable atime for DirectIOLinuxDirectory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965740#action_12965740 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2787: +1, this is a no brainer. I had

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2779) Use ConcurrentHashMap in RAMDirectory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-2779. Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 1041019 (3x). Committed revision 1041039 (trunk). Thanks all

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2787) disable atime for DirectIOLinuxDirectory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965705#action_12965705 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2787: - Uwe: I don't interpret it that way! I don't th

Re: API Semantics and Backwards

While I'm not against going back towards a checkout backwards that we can modify, I wonder if all the tests there should be there and how much do we actually duplicate. Lucene 3x should include all of 3.0 tests + new ones that test new functionality, or assert bug fixes etc. There shouldn't be a t

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2787) disable atime for DirectIOLinuxDirectory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965700#action_12965700 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2787: - Also simon, i just wanted to say, you need to b

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2787) disable atime for DirectIOLinuxDirectory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965701#action_12965701 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2787: --- bq. The option exists specifically for apps

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2787) disable atime for DirectIOLinuxDirectory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965697#action_12965697 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2787: - Simon, of course you can, but why not set it? O

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2787) disable atime for DirectIOLinuxDirectory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965695#action_12965695 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2787: - robert, you can also control this throu

Changes Mess

Hi all, when merging changes done in 2.9.4/3.0.3 with current 3.x and trunk I found out that 3.x changes differ immense between the trunk changes.txt and the 3.x changes.txt. Some entries are missing in the 3.x branch, but are available in trunk's 3.x part or other entries using new trunk class na

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2787) disable atime for DirectIOLinuxDirectory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2787: Attachment: LUCENE-2787.patch all core tests pass with this directory. > disable atime for Direct

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2787) disable atime for DirectIOLinuxDirectory

disable atime for DirectIOLinuxDirectory Key: LUCENE-2787 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2787 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: contrib/*

[jira] Created: (SOLR-2260) syntax error in shell script "abo"

syntax error in shell script "abo" -- Key: SOLR-2260 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2260 Project: Solr Issue Type: Sub-task Affects Versions: 1.4.1, 1.4 Reporter: Thomas Koch

Re: Document aware analyzers was Re: deprecating Versions

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > While we are at it, how about we make the Analysis process document aware > instead of Field aware?  The PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper, while doing exactly > what it says it does, is just silly.  If you had an analysis process that was > aware

Document aware analyzers was Re: deprecating Versions

On Nov 29, 2010, at 5:34 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote: >> And for indexes: >> * Index compatibility is guaranteed across two adjacent major >> releases. eg 2.x -> 3.x, 3.x -> 4.x. >> That includes both binary compat - codecs, and semantic compa

Board Report Due

We have a Board Report due this month. I will setup the placeholder in SVN. We have two things we must address beyond the usual: 1. The Trademark stuff. I will take the lead on this. 2. Per the conversation on Lucene.NET's status, we expect a full report from the .NET community in regards to th

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2259) Improve analyzer/version handling in Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965675#action_12965675 ] Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2259: --- I committed the patch for part 1 to trunk in revision

Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 2055 - Failure

Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/2055/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch.testDistribSearch Error Message: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions! Stack Trace: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Some threads threw uncaugh

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2786) no need for LowerCaseFilter from ArabicAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2786. - Resolution: Not A Problem lowercasefilter is there for non-arabic text, for consistency with oth

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2599) Deprecate Spatial Contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Male updated LUCENE-2599: --- Attachment: LUCENE-2599.patch Attaching a patch that includes the creation of a new spatial module.

queryNorm

Is it possible to remove the QueryNorm?? so all the bf boost became an add of the solr score?? omitNorm is about fieldNorm or queryNorm?? thanx -- Gastone Penzo

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2599) Deprecate Spatial Contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Male updated LUCENE-2599: --- Attachment: LUCENE-2599.patch Attached patch for deprecating the contrib. Each class is deprecated,

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1737) Always use bulk-copy when merging stored fields and term vectors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1737. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.1 > Always use bulk-copy when merging st

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2785) TopFieldCollector throws AIOOBE if numHits is 0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2785. Resolution: Fixed > TopFieldCollector throws AIOOBE if numHits is 0 >

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2599) Deprecate Spatial Contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965649#action_12965649 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2599: On it. > Deprecate Spatial Contrib > ---

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2599) Deprecate Spatial Contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965648#action_12965648 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2599: - chris, wanna come up with a patch again

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2139) Cleanup and Improvement of Spatial Contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965646#action_12965646 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2139: See LUCENE-2599 (which I'd opened up awhile back

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2599) Deprecate Spatial Contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Male updated LUCENE-2599: --- Description: The spatial contrib is blighted by bugs. The latest series, found by Grant and discus

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-1732) Multi-threaded Spatial Search

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Male closed LUCENE-1732. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Assignee: Chris Male Closing along with LUCENE-2139 > Multi-threaded Spat

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-2151) Abstract the distance calculation process in the Spatial contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Male closed LUCENE-2151. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Assignee: Chris Male (was: Simon Willnauer) Closing along with LUCENE-213

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-2149) Simplify Spatial LatLng and LLRect classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Male closed LUCENE-2149. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Assignee: Chris Male (was: Simon Willnauer) Closing along with LUCENE-213

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-2148) Improve Spatial Point2D and Rectangle Classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Male closed LUCENE-2148. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Assignee: Chris Male (was: Simon Willnauer) Closing along with LUCENE-213

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-2152) Abstract Spatial distance filtering process and supported field formats

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Male closed LUCENE-2152. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Assignee: Chris Male Closing along with LUCENE-2139 > Abstract Spatial di

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-2174) Add new SpatialFilter and DistanceFieldComparatorSource to Spatial

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Male closed LUCENE-2174. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Assignee: Chris Male (was: Simon Willnauer) Closing along with LUCENE-213

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-2173) Simplify and tidy Cartesian Tier Code in Spatial

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Male closed LUCENE-2173. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Assignee: Chris Male (was: Simon Willnauer) Closing along with LUCENE-213

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-2175) Deprecate remaining unused classes in Spatial

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Male closed LUCENE-2175. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Assignee: Chris Male Closing along with LUCENE-2139. > Deprecate remainin

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-2139) Cleanup and Improvement of Spatial Contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Male closed LUCENE-2139. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Assignee: Chris Male (was: Simon Willnauer) Closing as we will look into

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2139) Cleanup and Improvement of Spatial Contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965635#action_12965635 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2139: I have to echo Simon's comments here. Furthermor

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2139) Cleanup and Improvement of Spatial Contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965631#action_12965631 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2139: - bq. Pity to remove code before replacin

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2139) Cleanup and Improvement of Spatial Contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965621#action_12965621 ] Nicolas Helleringer commented on LUCENE-2139: - bq. Yep - but they are normally

Solr-trunk - Build # 1329 - Failure

Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/1329/ All tests passed Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 18570 lines...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1913) QParserPlugin plugin for Search Results Filtering Based on Bitwise Operations on Integer Fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965603#action_12965603 ] Shimon Shrem commented on SOLR-1913: I worked this out. I mistakenly used on old schema.