Hi Stefan,
* Java's bytecode doesn't contain metadata about generics and when Java is
compiled, all info about generics gets lost. So, IKVMed Lucene.Net will have
to live without generics.
* IKVM is the java world in .NET runtime in fact. If you are , for ex, to
write an analyzer, you have to
Hi DIGY
On 2011-01-28, digy digy wrote:
* Java's bytecode doesn't contain metadata about generics and when Java is
compiled, all info about generics gets lost. So, IKVMed Lucene.Net will have
to live without generics.
Ah, yes, the joys of type erasure. I completely missed that.
* IKVM is
* It's not possible to make custom changes in IKVMed Lucene.NET unless
you
make your changes in java sources and compile them.
Wouldn't a custom change contradict the goal of a line-by-line
translation?
What I intented to say was customizations made by Lucene.Net users, not as
a Lucene.Net
Hi guys,
I just subscribed to the dev list, and I think a lot is going on these days.
Can someone do a very quick recap or point me to some doc with the status of
the proposal?
Thx
Simone
--
Simone Chiaretta
Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider
Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz
RSS:
The discussion about the proposal can be seen on the tread below, just search
the page for [VOTE] Accept Lucene.Net for incubation
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201101.mbox/thread
Cheers
G
On 28 Jan 2011, at 14:18, Simone Chiaretta wrote:
Hi guys,
I just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12988013#action_12988013
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1709:
Hi David,
Yes, at the time my patching wasn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12988043#action_12988043
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2324:
Ahh, I see the problem now --
Hi Soheb,
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:29 +, Soheb Mahmood
soheb.luc...@gmail.com wrote:
We are going to implement distributed indexing for Solr - without the
use of SolrCloud (so it can be easily up-scaled). We have a deadline by
February to get this done, so we need to get cracking ;)
:-)
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:01 +, Alex Cowell
alxc...@gmail.com wrote:
Making it easy for clients I think is key... one should be
able to
update any node in the solr cluster and have solr take care of
the
hard part about updating all relevant shards. This will most
likely
involve
Another point that will need some thought, as I have heard alluded to,
is error handling.
Currently, as I understand it, if you post 500 documents to Solr, and
one has an error, the whole batch will fail.
Leaving aside whether that is the best behaviour, it is a behaviour that
will be impossible
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12988076#action_12988076
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2821:
Robert, are you sure we can apply the patch to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12988079#action_12988079
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
bq. Jason I don't think special
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12988082#action_12988082
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2324:
bq. Where are we gaining flush
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12988086#action_12988086
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2666:
Nick, are you running Lucene w/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12988089#action_12988089
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2822:
For reference, TimeLimitedCollector was added in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12988090#action_12988090
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
bq. Even if we do full stop for
We can fix that easily i think
Index: solr/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/QueryComponent.java
===
--- solr/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/QueryComponent.java
(revision
1064673)
+++
Yes, Yonik, all bigs fixed in Solr are fee free G.
Erick@Couldn'tResist.com
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yet in my case we don't use filters and have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated SOLR-860:
Attachment: SOLR-860.patch
New patch. I added a test to check the debug output for mlt. I'll commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1866:
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.1
better RAT reporting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-1866:
---
Assignee: Robert Muir
better RAT reporting
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1866:
Attachment: LUCENE-1866.patch
attached is a patch that moves the existing rat-sources task to
fixed in rev 1064730 (trunk) 1064761 (3x)
simon
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, Yonik, all bigs fixed in Solr are fee free G.
Erick@Couldn'tResist.com
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I have already sent this mail to Simon Willnauer, and he suggested me to post
it here for discussion.
I am David Nemeskey, a PhD student at the Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest,
Hungary. I am doing an IR-related research, and we have considered using
Lucene as our search engine. We
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:01 +, Alex Cowell alxc...@gmail.com wrote:
Making it easy for clients I think is key... one should be able to
update any node in the solr cluster and have solr take care of the
hard part about
+1 the proposal. We already have a committer digging into this area - he would
make a perfect GSoC mentor! And would likely love the help.
His response likely to follow...
- Mark
On Jan 28, 2011, at 11:32 AM, David Nemeskey wrote:
Hi all,
I have already sent this mail to Simon Willnauer,
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 the proposal. We already have a committer digging into this area - he
would make a perfect GSoC mentor! And would likely love the help.
same here +1 - if there is mentoring needed I will be there too.
Robert I
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:32 AM, David Nemeskey
nemeskey.da...@sztaki.hu wrote:
Hi all,
I have already sent this mail to Simon Willnauer, and he suggested me to post
it here for discussion.
I am David Nemeskey, a PhD student at the Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest,
Hungary. I am doing an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-2321.
Resolution: Fixed
start.jar is just the launcher so it probably doesn't matter, but I've updated
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/3/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.testDistribSearch
Error Message:
.response.numFound:51!=67
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: .response.numFound:51!=67
at
Hmm...I'll be digging back into this cloud work soon. And trying a newer
ZooKeeper lib. We will see how that helps.
- Mark
On Jan 28, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote:
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/4242/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
Just a follow-up to those interested...
I eventually went with procmail (with a little help from guys that
know it better). So, for folks who do have access to their MTA and can
filter e-mails, here it is (postfix/procmail combo):
cat ~/.forward
|/usr/bin/procmail
cat ~/.procmailrc
0:
{
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/4252/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterReader.testNoTermsIndex
Error Message:
should have failed to seek since terms index was not loaded. Codec used
MockRandom
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley reopened SOLR-1264:
Assignee: Yonik Seeley (was: Noble Paul)
if master slave is out of sync w/ master replication
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-1264.
Resolution: Fixed
oops, closing again - I missed that hoss had already cloned this issue.
if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley reassigned SOLR-2156:
--
Assignee: Yonik Seeley
Solr Replication - SnapPuller fails to clean Old Index Directories on
I just committed a fix ... was just another branch where
MockRandomCodec was ignoring -1 terms index divisor.
Mike
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Apache Hudson Server
hud...@hudson.apache.org wrote:
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/4252/
1 tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1076:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1076.patch
Patch. I think it's ready to commit...
To stress
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley updated SOLR-2155:
---
Attachment: GeoHashPrefixFilter.patch
Here is another patch. By the way, I'm using revision 1055285
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12988323#action_12988323
]
Bill Bell commented on SOLR-2155:
-
David,
How do you configure patialGeohashFilterQParser ?
Hi Yonik and Upayavira,
Thank you both for your insightful responses. We now have a much better
understanding of how to implement distributed indexing, although no doubt
more issues will emerge along the way.
Just to clarify (and for critique), our approach goes something like this:
We will use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12988356#action_12988356
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1076:
--
{quote}I also reworked how buffered
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated SOLR-2177:
-
Fix Version/s: 4.0
Add More Facet demonstrations to the /browse example
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/4258/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.CloudStateUpdateTest.testCoreRegistration
Error Message:
expected:2 but was:3
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:2 but was:3
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-1983.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.1
Thanks, I just committed this!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-2156.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.1
Thanks, I just committed this!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12988383#action_12988383
]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-445:
The SolrJ StreamingUpdateSolrServer needs updating
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12988401#action_12988401
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2155:
Hi Bill.
You simply throw this in your
48 matches
Mail list logo
