> just want to mention there is Android *duck* and they have 1.5 compat :)
Yup, I still count them in as "would-be happy with lucene 1.5 binary" folks :)
Dawid
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For addi
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Dawid Weiss
wrote:
>> -0 ... wouldn't that mean that users running *actual* 1.5 JVM installs
>> couldn't compile from source? I think it would be a bad idea to say that
>> our "compile" JVM requirements are differnet then our "run" JVM
>> requirements. I'd be mor
> -0 ... wouldn't that mean that users running *actual* 1.5 JVM installs
> couldn't compile from source? I think it would be a bad idea to say that
> our "compile" JVM requirements are differnet then our "run" JVM
> requirements. I'd be more in favor of requireing 1.6 then having a weird
> build
example work & logs directories needed?
---
Key: SOLR-2586
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2586
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Build
Reporter: David
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley closed SOLR-1232.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This was fixed long ago with the /spell request handler.
> Add spellchecker example
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-3188:
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.2)
(was: 3.0)
4.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-3188:
Attachment: LUCENE-3188.patch
Patch against branch_3x.
I converted Ivan's test class into a unit
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/8772/
4 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexReader.testFilesOpenClose
Error Message:
/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/checkout/lucene/build/test/5/TestIndexReader.testFile
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/1588/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 8001 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: de
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> Buf for bug fixes we really need to deal with this in a better way. We
> need to track *every* bug fix made on a branch, even if they were
> backported to an earlier branch.
>
I think we have?
bugfixes are the only case (assuming we go
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/8775/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 15394 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional co
: I agree with you completely (a rare occasion, i know!). I think it
I don't think it's that rare -- i suspect we agree 80% of the time, but
don't notice due to silent concenses.
: This is why hudson is complicated.
right .. no complaint from me, just explaining why we have a "nightly"
target
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : We could compile under 1.6 and have a jenkins (ant) target to check
> : binary 1.5 compatibility -- bytecode versions and std. API calls. This
> : way we could use 1.6, @Override annotations, etc. and still ensure 1.5
> : support for fo
: We could compile under 1.6 and have a jenkins (ant) target to check
: binary 1.5 compatibility -- bytecode versions and std. API calls. This
: way we could use 1.6, @Override annotations, etc. and still ensure 1.5
: support for folks that need it.
-0 ... wouldn't that mean that users running *a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047793#comment-13047793
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on SOLR-2584:
--
Or we can implement the function in the new up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047788#comment-13047788
]
Vinicius Barros commented on LUCENE-1768:
-
Hi Uwe,
Thanks for reviewing the patc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047781#comment-13047781
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3191:
---
Looks fine, I am happy now :-)
The Releva
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3191:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3191.patch
New patch, adds default impl for FC.compareValues to j
> > And I still tend to undelete FieldDocSortedHitQueue as it merged
> > TopDocs and LUCENE-3191 will get a very small patch. :-)
> >
>
> just please don't resurrect any Collators here in trunk!
Of course without them :-)
-
To
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> And I still tend to undelete FieldDocSortedHitQueue as it merged TopDocs and
> LUCENE-3191 will get a very small patch. :-)
>
just please don't resurrect any Collators here in trunk!
---
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-3.x/401/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 9153 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3191:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3191.patch
New patch:
* Changes .value from Comparator (which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047748#comment-13047748
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3191:
---
We had some discussions about cleaning thi
> > About the merging; when I look at Mikes code:
> > Except the global IDF and the bug in MTQ, the merging code is identical to
> what MultiSearcher did before. I would in trunk even recommend to
> undelete FieldDocSortedHitQueue and you have everything you need to
> merge two TopDocs instances.
>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>> Really? because I see your description of the situation as mixing two totally
>> different things:
>
> They are connected because they follow each other.
>
>> 1. a situation where a distributed case returns scores different than a
>> single
> Really? because I see your description of the situation as mixing two totally
> different things:
They are connected because they follow each other.
> 1. a situation where a distributed case returns scores different than a single
> node case. Who cares? This should be up to the user to make the
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> We have still a problem with queries that rewrite depending on index
> contents - which was the reason for MTQ's deMorgan bug. If two
> MultiTermQueries rewrite to different queries on two shards, the scores are
> also not comparable, even wi
We have still a problem with queries that rewrite depending on index
contents - which was the reason for MTQ's deMorgan bug. If two
MultiTermQueries rewrite to different queries on two shards, the scores are
also not comparable, even with normalized idf. This does not affect
WildCard&Co (because de
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer updated SOLR-2585:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2585.patch
> Context-Sensitive Spelling Suggestions & Collations
> --
Context-Sensitive Spelling Suggestions & Collations
---
Key: SOLR-2585
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2585
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: spellchec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047479#comment-13047479
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3191:
---
By the way, in current trunk the value() m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047478#comment-13047478
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-2564:
--
Hmm, I think this only needs to be a 4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047477#comment-13047477
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3191:
---
This still confuses me:
bq. There might o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047472#comment-13047472
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3191:
So... I started down this path (
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047440#comment-13047440
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3191:
Uwe, you are right! Now why did
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047420#comment-13047420
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2535:
The relayout of import statements in SolrDisptatch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047416#comment-13047416
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3191:
---
bq. The basic idea is simple (use PQ to fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047411#comment-13047411
]
Peter Wolanin commented on SOLR-2535:
-
Thanks for the patch. Is every thing in there r
And yes for 1 & 2.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Robert Stewart [mailto:robert_stew...@epam.com]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 10:36 PM
To:
Subject: [Lucene.Net] Faceting
I took a brief look at the documentation for faceting in contrib. I did not
look at code yet. Do you think it can wo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-3190:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
> TestStressIndexing2 testMultiConfig failure
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047408#comment-13047408
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3190:
-
I will dig!
> TestStressIndexing2 tes
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> On 6/10/11 6:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
>> I'm actually working on something like this, basically a utility
>> method to merge N TopDocs into 1. I want to do this for grouping as
>> well to make it easy to do grouping across shar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-3191:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Add TopDocs.merge to merge multiple TopDocs
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3191:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3191.patch
Patch.
The basic idea is simple (use PQ to find top N
Add TopDocs.merge to merge multiple TopDocs
---
Key: LUCENE-3191
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3191
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Michael McCa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley updated SOLR-2535:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2535_fix_admin_file_handler_for_directory_listings.patch
The attached patch fixes thi
Hi, guys,
FYI: Here is the link to how to build and start Apache Solr admin app from
source with Maven just in case you might be interested:
http://thetechietutorials.blogspot.com/2011/06/how-to-build-and-start-apache-solr.html
Have fun.
YH
Add a parameter in UIMAUpdateRequestProcessor to avoid duplicated values on
insert
--
Key: SOLR-2584
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2584
Project: Solr
TestStressIndexing2 testMultiConfig failure
---
Key: LUCENE-3190
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3190
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: selckin
trunk: r11
No I will try it though. Thanks.
Bob
On Jun 10, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Digy wrote:
> Have you tried to use Lucene.Net as is, before working on optimizing your
> code? There are a lot of speed improvements in it since 1.9.
> There is also a Faceted Search project in contrib.
> (https://cwiki.apache.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047354#comment-13047354
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-3188:
-
{quote}
I attached the patch to this issue as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-2564:
---
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
Marking this issue as a blocker for Solr 4.0 per McCandless comment in
SOLR-2
Hi Jason,
Standard MTQ queries have no scoring at all (using ConstantScoreRewrite by
default). Exception is FuzzyQuery which has two modes: One using standard
BQ TermQuery scoring multiplied with factor calculated from levensthein
distance and another one with all TermQueries made constant score a
On 6/10/11 7:51 PM, Jason Rutherglen wrote:
Out of curiosity, how is DF handled with the new automaton [regex] queries?
Automaton is eventually resolved into a list of terms, and the IDF for
each term is obtained in the usual way.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Simon can you also email java-user@ and solr-user@? Seems good to
> over-communicate when trunk index format changes...
good point, done!
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Si
Out of curiosity, how is DF handled with the new automaton [regex] queries?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> On 6/10/11 6:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
>> I'm actually working on something like this, basically a utility
>> method to merge N TopDocs into 1. I want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047315#comment-13047315
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1768 at 6/10/11 5:48 PM:
---
On 6/10/11 6:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
I'm actually working on something like this, basically a utility
method to merge N TopDocs into 1. I want to do this for grouping as
well to make it easy to do grouping across shards.
Mike,
The straightforward merge that is used in Solr suffers fr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047315#comment-13047315
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1768:
---
One small thing I have seen after applying
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047291#comment-13047291
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1768:
---
Hi Vinicius,
if you want the code be comm
Ok sounds good. Grouping is an interesting distrib case.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> I'm actually working on something like this, basically a utility
> method to merge N TopDocs into 1. I want to do this for grouping as
> well to make it easy to do grouping acro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047279#comment-13047279
]
Ivan Dimitrov Vasilev commented on LUCENE-3188:
---
Hi Steve,
I attached the
Have you tried to use Lucene.Net as is, before working on optimizing your
code? There are a lot of speed improvements in it since 1.9.
There is also a Faceted Search project in contrib.
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Simple+Faceted+Search
)
DIGY
-Original Message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047275#comment-13047275
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-1431:
I just downloaded http://svn.apache.org/re
I'm actually working on something like this, basically a utility
method to merge N TopDocs into 1. I want to do this for grouping as
well to make it easy to do grouping across shards.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Jason Rutherglen
wrote:
>> it
> its fine to have some higher-level class to support this crap, but it
> shouldnt be some transparent searcher.
I'll create a patch and post to a Jira.
On a side note, for multi threaded calls I noticed there's a lock on
the PQ in IndexSearcher, is the performance of that OK?
On Fri, Jun 10, 20
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ivan Dimitrov Vasilev updated LUCENE-3188:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3188.patch
The file LUCENE-3188.patch contains the needed c
Simon can you also email java-user@ and solr-user@? Seems good to
over-communicate when trunk index format changes...
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I just committed LUCENE-3108 (Landing DocValues on Trun
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Jason Rutherglen
wrote:
> I think we only need to resurrect the merge score/field-docs code, in
> it's own class. Eg, each sub-node is expected to create it's own
> score/field-docs, then the merge code is centralized.
>
>> Maybe we should bring back the 'merge r
I think we only need to resurrect the merge score/field-docs code, in
it's own class. Eg, each sub-node is expected to create it's own
score/field-docs, then the merge code is centralized.
> Maybe we should bring back the 'merge results' part of multi searcher
> without the query rewrite.
This i
As I previously tried to explain, I have custom query for some pre-cached
terms, which I load into RAM in efficient compressed form. I need this for
faster searching and also for much faster faceting. So what I do is process
incoming query and replace certain sub-queries with my own "CachedTer
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Jason Rutherglen
wrote:
>
> Maybe we should bring back the 'merge results' part of multi searcher
> without the query rewrite.
>
and how exactly? If this was easy, we wouldn't have to do
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2837
I looked at this stupid m
> but if instead you just run the query against your subs (rewrite()ing
> etc locally), and you merge search results... then you shouldn't see
> these issues
Maybe we should bring back the 'merge results' part of multi searcher
without the query rewrite.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Robert Mui
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047245#comment-13047245
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-3188:
-
This is a better Wikipedia article on (source
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047234#comment-13047234
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2793:
-
Varun, your patch doesn't apply cleanl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Varun Thacker updated LUCENE-2793:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2793.patch
I had messed up the patch using eclipse. This should be ok.
> D
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated SOLR-2582:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2582.patch
> Use uniqueKey for error log in UIMAUpdateRequestProcessor
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated SOLR-2582:
-
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
Fix Version/s: 4.0
Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/145/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 7512 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047208#comment-13047208
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2878:
-
it doesn't seem that this issue is wor
Hey folks,
I just committed LUCENE-3108 (Landing DocValues on Trunk) which adds a
byte to FieldInfo.
If you are running on trunk you must / should re-index any trunk
indexes once you update to the latest trunk.
its likely if you open up old trunk (4.0) indexes, you will get an
exception related t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Varun Thacker updated LUCENE-2793:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2793.patch
I think I have successfully threaded IOContext to the codecs and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047185#comment-13047185
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-1431:
---
So my bad - looks like this patch is for 3.x - need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047179#comment-13047179
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-423:
You are right, I used a different date string.
.Net s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047177#comment-13047177
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-1431:
---
I've got to look a little closer here - there was a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-3108.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Reintegrated, Tested, Committed to trunk in revision 1134311
thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047171#comment-13047171
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-152:
-
bq. i think its the same as the patch i uploade
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047168#comment-13047168
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-152:
it looks good... i think its the same as the patc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-152:
Attachment: LUCENE-152_optimization.patch
bq. why create strings either?
Good point. I assume you
Build:
https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-docvalues-branch/1260/
2 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexReaderReopen.testThreadSafety
Error Message:
Error occurred in thread Thread-175:
/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-docva
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047164#comment-13047164
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-3188:
-
Hi Ivan,
Your submissions should be in the fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-1431:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.0
> CommComponent abstracted
>
>
> Key: SOLR-1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller reassigned SOLR-1431:
-
Assignee: Mark Miller (was: Noble Paul)
> CommComponent abstracted
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047160#comment-13047160
]
Simon Willnauer commented on SOLR-1431:
---
I think this patch looks good, mark I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-152:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-152_alt.patch
why create strings either?
> [PATCH] KStem for Lucene
> ---
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-3.x/148/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 8340 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-152:
Attachment: LUCENE-152_optimization.patch
very minor optimization to avoid a char[] allocation per
TestIndexWriter.testThreadInterruptDeadlock failed (can't reproduce)
Key: LUCENE-3189
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3189
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Ty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ivan Dimitrov Vasilev updated LUCENE-3188:
--
Attachment: IndexSplitter.java
TestIndexSplitter.java
The atta
The class from cotrub directory org.apache.lucene.index.IndexSplitter creates a
non correct index
-
Key: LUCENE-3188
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
