[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-424.
---
Resolution: Later
Fix Version/s: (was: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155744#comment-13155744
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3588:
-
Looks good to me. Interesting solution.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
So I'm ammending my vote of RC2 to a -1.
the link is already working again. So i guess RC2 fixed itself.
--
lucidimagination.com
-
To
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155749#comment-13155749
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3587:
-
Thanks for the alternative patch Steven.
My
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar resolved SOLR-2904.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed r1204946 on branch_3x.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155806#comment-13155806
]
Simon Willnauer commented on SOLR-2911:
---
I committed this to trunk 3x. I just wanted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3588:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3588-simpler.patch
Here a much simplier patch than the one yesterday
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155816#comment-13155816
]
Rahul Mehta edited comment on SOLR-2703 at 11/23/11 11:30 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155816#comment-13155816
]
Rahul Mehta edited comment on SOLR-2703 at 11/23/11 11:31 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155822#comment-13155822
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3588:
-
I was thinking about this when looking at the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155826#comment-13155826
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3588:
---
WeakHashMap silently discards GCed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155827#comment-13155827
]
Edoardo Tosca commented on SOLR-2633:
-
Hey, sorry for the silence, i've been very busy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3588:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3588-simpler.patch
Improved patch:
- The clones (even clones of clones)
here is my +1
everything passes for me
Test Lucene...
test basics...
http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.5.0-RC2-rev1204988/lucene/
0.1 MB
check changes HTML...
http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.5.0-RC2-rev1204988/lucene/changes-3.5.0/
I ran my usual tests for RC2 and all pass, so +1 to release.
As for what's been said in this thread, I personally don't think that
javadoc errors such as reported should hold a release. But I think that it
will be good if we can define some criteria for accepting an RC.
For example, we can
This jar-src error is known to me, there is missing a dependency that
creates build.dir J I never managed to fix it, but have seen it quite often.
We should ignore that for now.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de/ http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155835#comment-13155835
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-2703:
--
Rahul:
See:
Here my +1:
- PANGAEA large index works without hotspot crashes or corrupt index :-)
- The javadocs of FilterIndexReader are fixed
- Benchmark builds and tests on windows, of course all others too
- HTML pages look correct
- CHANGES look correct
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved SOLR-2911.
---
Resolution: Fixed
website is updated and published
Add news to website for
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/11476/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterOnDiskFull.testAddDocumentOnDiskFull
Error Message:
after disk full during addDocument: before delete: _0.fdt _0.fdx
_0.fnm _0.nrm
+1 here.
For the lucene part I tested the following:
* md5 signatures:
for i in *md5; do; md5sum -c $i; done
lucene-3.5.0-src.tgz: OK
lucene-3.5.0.tgz: OK
lucene-3.5.0.zip: OK
* compare the size of tgz and zip extractions
* ant: clean + test + javadocs targets - all passed
*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3588:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3588-simpler.patch
LUCENE-3588.patch
New patch, that no
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/11477/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.search.TestRealTimeGet.testStressGetRealtime
Error Message:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155894#comment-13155894
]
Luca Cavanna commented on LUCENE-3586:
--
Hi Uwe,
I'm working with lucene 3.4 and jvm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155894#comment-13155894
]
Luca Cavanna edited comment on LUCENE-3586 at 11/23/11 2:23 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155897#comment-13155897
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-3588:
-
Patch (last one) works well for me - the new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2487:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2487.patch
New patch with target name dist-war-excl-slf4j. Now the exclude.from.war
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-3588.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: New,Patch Available (was: New)
Committed trunk
File descriptor leak in ShowFileRequestHandler.getFileContents()
Key: SOLR-2912
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2912
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155920#comment-13155920
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2911:
Thanks Simon!
I know the Solr 3.5 release will be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-2912:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.6
File descriptor leak in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
sebastian L. updated LUCENE-3440:
-
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-4.0-SNAPSHOT-3440-9.patch)
FastVectorHighlighter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
sebastian L. updated LUCENE-3440:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-3440.patch
Patch trunk 1205430. Works for me sa far,
- Test fixed
- New
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
sebastian L. updated LUCENE-3440:
-
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-3.5-SNAPSHOT-3440-8.patch)
FastVectorHighlighter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155924#comment-13155924
]
sebastian L. edited comment on LUCENE-3440 at 11/23/11 3:42 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gabriel Cooper updated SOLR-2864:
-
Attachment: lucene-2864.patch
Excellent feedback. I've changed the sort to be depth-first,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155952#comment-13155952
]
Gabriel Cooper commented on SOLR-2864:
--
In re-reading my comment, I realized I wasn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155955#comment-13155955
]
Antony Stubbs commented on LUCENE-668:
--
Hi Mark, don't you think this is a valid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155958#comment-13155958
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-668:
--
From the architecture of Lucene you *always*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155960#comment-13155960
]
Antony Stubbs commented on LUCENE-668:
--
Cool, thanks for the explanation Uwe.
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/11479/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.update.SoftAutoCommitTest.testSoftAndHardCommitMaxTimeDelete
Error Message:
Got a soft commit we weren't expecting
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Got a soft
: This is why I agree with your fix (versus adding a regular expression
: to ignore the warning in addition to Uwe's java 7 hack)... its just
: about whether it should be a blocker to release or not.
:
: Because chances are within the 72 hour vote period the link starts
: working again... if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13156003#comment-13156003
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-3587:
--
rmuir: I'm not sure where/how you got the impression
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13156034#comment-13156034
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-3587:
-
Hoss, whatever happened to LUCENE-3228 ?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13156273#comment-13156273
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-2906:
Possibly false alarm. Although I still do not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13156300#comment-13156300
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3587:
--
+1 on the patch. Javadoc external
Hi,
Can we not simply release that package as it contains really important
security fixes? Fixing this issue can be done later and is not needed for
this release (otherwise we must fix all previous releases, because their
Javadocs are broken). We already have more than three +1 votes, so where is
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
We already have more than three +1 votes, so where is the issue?
If someone votes -1, the response shouldn't be we already have 3
+1s, so your -1 doesn't really matter.
I think what you really meant to say was I don't think
As far as I remember you cannot vote against...
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13156334#comment-13156334
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2607:
---
I'd say kill client/ and add a paragraph in
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
As far as I remember you cannot vote against...
Re-read what I wrote: one should debate the merit of the actual
argument/issues, not your vote doesn't count.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
I think this issue should not block the release. We already rolled a
RC2 for a benchmark test and 3 lines of javadoc. This issue is not
really an issue IMO since the likelihood that those servers go down
for a long time is extremely low and if so folks can still download a
binary release or patch
Hi,
From my perspective the argument is:
A missing/temporary unavailable external resource is no problem of a
release. It was fixed by Oracle, so only temporary and all is fine again.
Just because you *may* not build javadocs at some time in the future does
not rectify to hold a release.
How do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-3496:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3496.patch
Updated patch.
* All tests pass now.
* Added dv
: As far as I remember you cannot vote against...
bull. fucking. shit.
Release VOTEs can not be VETOed, but people are free to vote as they see
fit...
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
I cast my vote, and stated my opinions about respining. Discussion
ensued. If you
I already posted my opinion, in another mail.
Sorry for being @UweSays!
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 24,
: Hi all, I have need of the functionality proposed in SOLR-1351, and I would
: like the chance to dip my toes in the water to implement this
:
: what would be needed to resurrect this patch ?
Hey Greg, thanks for your interest in contributing.
Rather then reply with comments here in email,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13156425#comment-13156425
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1351:
Someone asked on the dev list about resurrecting Uri's
: Sorry for being @UweSays!
: Uwe
Whoa that's a little too meta even for me ... it's turtles all the
way down!
-Hoss
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13156562#comment-13156562
]
Robert Ragno commented on LUCENE-3067:
--
I believe that this is the same issue as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-380.
---
Resolution: Not A Problem
Assignee: Prescott Nasser (was: Alex Thompson)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13156582#comment-13156582
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3067:
---
Robert Ragno: You mean files outside
62 matches
Mail list logo
