[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13182386#comment-13182386
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1499:
--
An DataSource is responsible for fetching data from an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13182338#comment-13182338
]
Mike commented on SOLR-2866:
This seems like a strange solution to me. The main problem I see i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13182332#comment-13182332
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3602:
-
{quote}
Maybe we should have to variants one r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13182329#comment-13182329
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-3602:
---
bq. But I think the first
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3679:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3679.patch
New patch; I fixed the composite readers to throw UOE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13182305#comment-13182305
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2358:
---
Hey Darren - I have re written the description a bit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-2358:
--
Attachment: 2shard4server.jpg
> Distributing Indexing
> -
>
> Ke
I created a ticket for this: SOLR-3015. I hope there's a simple solution and I
can just close it, but if not I will experiment and try to produce a patch.
Karl
From: Wright Karl (Nokia-LC/Boston)
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2012 11:02 AM
To: dev@lucene.apa
CloseHook cannot be used with QParserPlugins
Key: SOLR-3015
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3015
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Karl Wright
For some kinds of
I haven't tried the trunk/4.0 stuff, so maybe I'm out of line, but how about a
public alpha first. It would have appropriate disclaimers regarding quality and
that the API, while reasonably stable, is subject to change w/ little notice.
I tink beta implies that there is a high degree of confiden
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13182278#comment-13182278
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3681:
I like the idea of moving read/w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-3681.
Resolution: Fixed
> FST.BYTE2 should save as fixed 2 byte not as vInt
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13182275#comment-13182275
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3682:
+1
Anything we can do to make t
Add deprecated 'transition' api for Document/Field
--
Key: LUCENE-3682
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3682
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Rober
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13182271#comment-13182271
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3681:
-
+1 to this patch initially. I agree we should
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
>>
>> From the tests/bugfixing perspective, on trunk its not hard to dig
>> into stuff here and there and find lots of really horrible bugs that
>> exist in trunk-only. This is a sign that our tests are not good enough
>> and that the code is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13182269#comment-13182269
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3602:
Wow new patch is tiny -- just 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3681:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3681.patch
Simple patch...
> FST.BYTE2 should sa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3074:
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> SimpleTextCodec needs SimpleText DocValues impl
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-3074:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer (was: Michael McCandless)
> SimpleTextCodec needs Sim
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>> hey folks,
>>
>> now that we have everything under codec control and norms are cut over
>> to docvalues I wonder what keeps us from moving towards a 4.0 beta
>> release.
>
> here are m
FST.BYTE2 should save as fixed 2 byte not as vInt
-
Key: LUCENE-3681
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3681
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter:
Improve UIMA UpdateRequestProcessor performances by providing UIMA-AS support
-
Key: SOLR-3014
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3014
Project: Solr
Iss
Add UIMA based tokenizers / filters that can be used in the schema.xml
--
Key: SOLR-3013
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3013
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Impro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13182257#comment-13182257
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2796:
---
We should fix this. Looks like it was introduced wit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13182250#comment-13182250
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on SOLR-2072:
-
Nice prototype! Good idea to use
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>> hey folks,
>>
>> now that we have everything under codec control
By the way: this is a little misleading: Deletes and compound-file
format are still not done.
--
lucidimagination.c
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> hey folks,
>
> now that we have everything under codec control and norms are cut over
> to docvalues I wonder what keeps us from moving towards a 4.0 beta
> release.
here are my thoughts:
But just taking that issue (not to try to pick on i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13182238#comment-13182238
]
Erick Erickson edited comment on SOLR-2438 at 1/8/12 4:08 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13182238#comment-13182238
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-2438:
--
Michael:
Can we close this?
On Jan 8, 2012, at 9:30 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> hey folks,
>
> now that we have everything under codec control and norms are cut over
> to docvalues I wonder what keeps us from moving towards a 4.0 beta
> release. IMO its more than time to get it out there and from a
> technical perspective
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2858:
--
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> Separate SegmentReaders (and other atomic readers) from
Can I first split composite from atomic readers?
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 3:31 PM
> To: dev@
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/1462/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.CloudStateUpdateTest.testCoreRegistration
Error Message:
expected:<1> but was:<0>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
a
hey folks,
now that we have everything under codec control and norms are cut over
to docvalues I wonder what keeps us from moving towards a 4.0 beta
release. IMO its more than time to get it out there and from a
technical perspective we are close enough to take that step. We need
to figure out how
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-3.x/356/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterExceptions.testRandomExceptionsThreads
Error Message:
thread Indexer 1: hit unexpected failure
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: thread Indexer 1: hit unexpec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated SOLR-3012:
-
Attachment: SOLR-3012.patch
I also changed doGet methods to static in this patch.
SimplePostTool: move getProperty(type) out of postData()
Key: SOLR-3012
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3012
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter:
38 matches
Mail list logo
