Hi Ryan,
I already mentioned that in the issue: Should we not also place the generic
servlet API 2.5 in the lib folder, so compilation of Solr does also check,
that the Servlet(Filter)s are compatible with the 2.5 version of the API, so
also not-yet-3.0 Servlet container are supported. If we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller reassigned SOLR-2949:
-
Assignee: Mark Miller (was: Grant Ingersoll)
QueryElevationComponent does not fully support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-2949:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2949.patch
A short term fix + a fix for SOLR-3252 + a test.
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/12765/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterExceptions.testIllegalPositions
Error Message:
position=-2 lastPosition=0
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: position=-2 lastPosition=0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230950#comment-13230950
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3867:
-
Yep, but I'm talking about address registers
TestIndexWriterExceptions fails (reproducible)
--
Key: LUCENE-3876
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3876
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Dawid Weiss
Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3876 for this,
didn't have the time to look into it.
Dawid
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/12765/
1 tests failed.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230959#comment-13230959
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3867:
-
Nice. All of a sudden you could enumerate all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230959#comment-13230959
]
Dawid Weiss edited comment on LUCENE-3867 at 3/16/12 8:03 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230171#comment-13230171
]
Dawid Weiss edited comment on LUCENE-3867 at 3/16/12 8:03 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230977#comment-13230977
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3867:
---
I played around: Unsafe.arrayBaseOffset
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230979#comment-13230979
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3867:
-
bq. For normal objects, is there a way with
So close!
https://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/updated_java_6_eol_date?msgid=3-6077692575
Dawid
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/12766/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterExceptions.testIllegalPositions
Error Message:
position=-2 lastPosition=0
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: position=-2 lastPosition=0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-3870:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
VarDerefBytesImpl doc values prefix length may fall
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3870:
Attachment: LUCENE-3870.patch
nice catch mike! Here is a patch fixing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230987#comment-13230987
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-3869:
-
Ok thanks Robert, let me know if you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230994#comment-13230994
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3867:
---
Interestingly the ARRAY header seems to be
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-trunk/1795/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryZkTest.testDistribSearch
Error Message:
Uncaught exception by thread: Thread[Lucene Merge Thread #1,6,]
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231001#comment-13231001
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3867:
---
This is also in line with this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231002#comment-13231002
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3867:
-
Array header is still 12 bytes but it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231003#comment-13231003
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3867:
---
But how does that explain that with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231014#comment-13231014
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3876:
-
this seems to be related to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reopened LUCENE-3874:
-
see my comment on LUCENE-3876 - this triggers reproducible failures on trunk.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231017#comment-13231017
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3867:
-
Can you check what size does Object[] report
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231033#comment-13231033
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3870:
+1, looks good Simon!
Just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231035#comment-13231035
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3876:
Hmm I think we need a separate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-3870.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: New,Patch Available (was: New)
fixed
Lucene should not call System.out.println
-
Key: LUCENE-3877
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3877
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Michael McCandless
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231045#comment-13231045
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3867:
-
We peeked at the forbidden a bit again. The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231042#comment-13231042
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3876:
-
bq. Hmm I think we need a separate
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/12767/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterExceptions.testIllegalPositions
Error Message:
position=-2 lastPosition=0
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: position=-2 lastPosition=0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231053#comment-13231053
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3877:
-
Lots of tests write to std streams currently
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3874.
-
Resolution: Fixed
The solution here is 100% correct, we don't need to reopen it because its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231084#comment-13231084
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3876:
-
it shoudl check exactly at the point before
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231090#comment-13231090
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3877:
I think it's fine if tests write
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231095#comment-13231095
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3877:
-
This is possible by verifying where System.out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3867:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3867.patch
With the help of Dawid (inspecting forbidden C code *g*), we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231097#comment-13231097
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3867:
---
I would like to remove the AverageBlabla
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231098#comment-13231098
]
Benson Margulies commented on LUCENE-3877:
--
findbugs? checkstyle?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3876:
Attachment: LUCENE-3876_test.patch
By the way, the reason this doesnt fail always but only for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3876:
Fix Version/s: 3.6
See my comment and test (which produces a corrumpt index on 3.x)
The fact
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/12768/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterExceptions.testIllegalPositions
Error Message:
position=-2 lastPosition=0
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: position=-2 lastPosition=0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3876:
Attachment: LUCENE-3876.patch
attached is a fix. I want to commit soon.
We just used the wrong
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231107#comment-13231107
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3876:
+1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3876.
-
Resolution: Fixed
thanks everyone!
TestIndexWriterExceptions fails
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3867:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3867.patch
Updated patch with the abstract and now useless MemoryModel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3867:
--
Summary: RamUsageEstimator.NUM_BYTES_ARRAY_HEADER and other constants are
incorrect (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231134#comment-13231134
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3867:
---
Robert reminded me that there is also a
CheckIndex should check deleted documents too
-
Key: LUCENE-3878
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3878
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Affects Versions: 4.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231176#comment-13231176
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-3877:
-
Don't we now fail if there is a noncommit in
Which just begs the question (sorry if it has been discussed before) of
whether we should officially only support Solr/Lucene 4.0 under Java 1.7.
Erick
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Dawid Weiss dawid.we...@gmail.com wrote:
So close!
Which just begs the question (sorry if it has been discussed before) of
whether we should officially only support Solr/Lucene 4.0 under Java 1.7.
Erick
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Dawid Weiss dawid.we...@gmail.com wrote:
So close!
fix more position corrumptions in 4.0 codecs
Key: LUCENE-3879
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3879
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Robert Muir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3879:
Attachment: LUCENE-3879.patch
initial cut at a patch, some bugs in Sep and Pulsing. Didn't run
I see no problem in supporting Java 7. All tests run with Java 7, both 3.x and
trunk. I have a production instance of Lucene running with Java 7. The only
requirement is u1.
Lucene 3.5 was the first version not only compiling against Java 7 worked, but
also running all tests. The code already
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3879:
Attachment: LUCENE-3879.patch
I ran the test many times: found one more invalid assert in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231222#comment-13231222
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3738:
-
LUCENE-3876/LUCENE-3879 reveal more situations
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Which just begs the question (sorry if it has been discussed before) of
whether we should officially only support Solr/Lucene 4.0 under Java 1.7.
Lucene's purpose is to be a dependency for other projects, and that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3879.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
fix more position corrumptions in 4.0 codecs
Sorry, I misunderstood the original question...
-1 to *only* support Java 7 in both Lucene and Solr. This is way to early.
Java 7 is not yet released to the public end user, you can only get it as
developer resource, not on official end-user java download triggered e.g.
from the browser on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3848.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.6
I opened LUCENE-3873 to integrate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231238#comment-13231238
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3869:
-
Tommaso my computer has been crazy before...
OK, that settles that G, 1.6 going forward.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Sorry, I misunderstood the original question...
-1 to *only* support Java 7 in both Lucene and Solr. This is way to early.
Java 7 is not yet released to the public end user,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231260#comment-13231260
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2949:
In distributedProcess, I understand the switching
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231263#comment-13231263
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3877:
-
Some core code legitimately uses
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231272#comment-13231272
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3877:
-
IndexUpgrader is another example. I think if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231286#comment-13231286
]
Luca Cavanna commented on LUCENE-3877:
--
I feel guilty...maybe because I wrote that
Maybe some time after the 4.x branch is created, the trunk can move to Java
7?
3.x branch supports Java 5, 4.x and current trunk support Java 6. Seems
natural to me that the future 5.x and future trunk would support Java 7...
Martijn
On 16 March 2012 15:50, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/427/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 6888 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231295#comment-13231295
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3738:
Hmm... I think we should think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231296#comment-13231296
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3878:
+1
CheckIndex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231297#comment-13231297
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3738:
-
Well that differs with the title of the issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231303#comment-13231303
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3878:
-
Actually if we are willing to add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231307#comment-13231307
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3877:
I removed the std prints in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231309#comment-13231309
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3738:
{quote}
don't see how we can
On 03/16/2012 05:04 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
So close!
https://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/updated_java_6_eol_date?msgid=3-6077692575
Dawid
It's only close as a date. It is rather far away in practice. It is
developer only at this point.
Also, they are working on a Mac version, but I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3878:
Attachment: LUCENE-3878.patch
patch for trunk.
CheckIndex should check deleted
defaultCoreName mapped as singlecore in UI
--
Key: SOLR-3253
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3253
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: web gui
Environment:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3738:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3738.patch
Patch, just adding assert in writeVLong that i =0,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3878:
Attachment: LUCENE-3878.patch
updated patch with separate liveDocs validation for each segment...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3867:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3867.patch
Attached is a patch fixing several bugs and more:
- Removed the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231388#comment-13231388
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3867:
-
{quote}
Removed the MemoryIndex VM class and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231398#comment-13231398
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-2599:
--
This contrib module was eliminated from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231401#comment-13231401
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3738:
---
I just repeat myself:
bq. If we disallow,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231413#comment-13231413
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3867:
-
Awesome job, Uwe. I think I wasn't right about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231457#comment-13231457
]
Emmanuel Espina commented on SOLR-3246:
---
Probably the output format could be set in a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231470#comment-13231470
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3738:
bq. If we disallow, it should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231485#comment-13231485
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-3253:
-
Markus, that sounds like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231492#comment-13231492
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3738:
---
bq. Hmm, I don't think we should do that.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231506#comment-13231506
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3738:
-
{quote}
Otherwise you can even produce endless
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-2949:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2949.patch
A better, more working patch.
QueryElevationComponent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231527#comment-13231527
]
Aliaksandr Zhuhrou commented on SOLR-3238:
--
As a suggestion can we allow specify
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231527#comment-13231527
]
Aliaksandr Zhuhrou edited comment on SOLR-3238 at 3/16/12 7:04 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231530#comment-13231530
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2949:
---
bq. Perhaps we just need to check for instanceof
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231542#comment-13231542
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3878:
-
ok this was pretty easy as a start. I didnt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231543#comment-13231543
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3738:
---
You misunderstood my comment:
bq. I see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-3738:
-
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
Be consistent about negative vInt/vLong
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3878.
-
Resolution: Fixed
CheckIndex should check deleted documents too
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikhail Khludnev updated SOLR-3011:
---
Attachment: SOLR-3011.patch
OK. next attempt.
Core point is cover case shed by Petr:
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
